| Literature DB >> 28572957 |
Josiane E Manejo Djiogue1, Richard M Nguimbou1, Leopold N Tatsadjieu2, Yannick D Mang3, Nicolas Y Njintang1,4.
Abstract
Nnam gon, a cake made by steam cooking a mixture of Cucurbitaceae seeds paste and others ingredients specially spices, is a highly prized dish in Central African region. A preliminary investigation conducted as part of this study highlighted that formulations used in the processing of Nnam gon vary according to the spices used. This study was carried out to determine the best formulation for the preparation of this dish. For this purpose, Nnam gon samples were produced from four formulations which differ according to the number of spices used: F0 (no spices); F1 (0.91 g of Allium cepa paste); F2 (0.88 g of A. cepa paste, 0.35 g of Allium sativum paste, 0.41 g of fresh Officinale zingiber paste, 0.41 g of fresh Petroselinum crispum paste, 0.33 g of Monodora myristica, 0.48 g of fresh Celery graveolens paste, 1.19 g of fresh Allium porrum paste, 0.13 g of Allium lepidophyllus powder, and 0.13 g of Piper nigrum), and F3 (0.90 g of A. cepa paste, 0.35 g of A. sativum paste, and 0.42 g of fresh O. zingiber paste). The samples were evaluated for their physicochemical characteristics and sensory profile (Quantitative Descriptive Analysis). The results revealed that proteins (16.56-17.38%), carbohydrates (4.71-5.10%), lipids (23.14-24.25%), ash (4.03-5.92%), and fibers (2.17-2.68%) increased significantly (p < .05) with spices adding. The increase in polyphenols (310.55-592.80 mg/100 g FM) and phytates (2.23-12.49 mg/100 g FM) contents was positively correlated with antioxidant properties of Nnam gon which also increased with spices adding. Significant differences were observed between the samples for all attributes generated (appearance, odor, taste, flavor, texture, and oral texture). Spices adding induced a decrease in hardness, cohesivity, elasticity, and granulous of cake but enhanced oily. Nnam gon produced with spicy formulation (F2 and F3) had higher mean score for general acceptance which was highly correlated (p < .05) with spice odor (r = .99), spice taste (r = .92), and color (r = .84). From this study, it is suggested that spicy Cucurbitaceae paste could improve nutritional value, antioxidant properties, and general acceptance of Nnam gon.Entities:
Keywords: cucurbitaceae cake; physicochemical characteristics; quantitative descriptive analysis; spices
Year: 2016 PMID: 28572957 PMCID: PMC5448344 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.447
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Composition of formulated pastes (100 g) used for preparation of Nnam gon samples
| Ingredients (g) | Formula 0 | Formula 1 | Formula 2 | Formula 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cucurbitaceae flour | 52.54 | 47.00 | 45.60 | 46.64 |
| Water | 45.63 | 41.19 | 40.05 | 40.96 |
| Salt | 1.83 | 1.82 | 1.77 | 1.81 |
| Fresh eggs | – | 3.37 | 3.27 | 3.35 |
| Soya oil | – | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.86 |
| Fresh fish (mackerel) | – | 4.83 | 4.68 | 4.79 |
| Onion paste | – | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.90 |
| Dried shrimps | – | 0.46 | – | 0.45 |
| Garlic paste | – | – | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| Fresh ginger paste | – | – | 0.41 | 0.42 |
| Fresh parsley paste | – | – | 0.41 | – |
| Pèppè powder | – | – | 0.33 | – |
| Fresh celery paste | – | – | 0.48 | – |
| Fresh leek paste | – | – | 1.19 | – |
| Disc powder | – | – | 0.13 | – |
| Black pepper powder | – | – | 0.13 | – |
Scientific names of spices: Onion: Allium cepa; Garlic: Allium sativum; Pèppè: Monodora myristica; Black pepper: Piper nigrum; Disc: Afrostyrax lepidophyllus; Leek: Allium porrum; Ginger: Officinale Zingiber; Celery: Celery graveolens; Parsley: Petroselinum crispum.
Figure 1Diagram of production of Cucurbitaceae cake called Nnam gon
Effect of formulation on proximate composition of Nnam gon
| Parameters (/100 g DM) | Formula/Samples | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F0 | F1 | F2 | F3 | |
| Water content (g) | 49.33 ± 1.97a | 46.67 ± 1.97a | 44.61 ± 2.04a | 45.70 ± 1.77a |
| Lipids (g) | 23.14 ± 0.16a | 24.05 ± 0.11b | 24.25 ± 0.17b | 24.16 ± 0.10b |
| Proteins (g) | 16.56 ± 0.26a | 17.22 ± 0.31b | 17.38 ± 0.20b | 17.26 ± 0.23b |
| Total sugar (g) | 4.71 ± 0.28a | 4.74 ± 0.26a | 5.10 ± 0.15b | 4.96 ± 0.11a |
| Reducing sugar (g) | 0.10 ± 0.05a | 0.12 ± 0.08a | 0.18 ± 0.02b | 0.15 ± 0.05ab |
| Ash (g) | 4.03 ± 0.15a | 4.58 ± 0.93a | 5.92 ± 0.13b | 5.62 ± 0.48b |
| Fibers (g) | 2.17 ± 0.13a | 2.24 ± 0.17a | 2.68 ± 0.12b | 2.56 ± 0.14b |
Mean ± SD values with different letters within the same line differed significantly (p < .05) as determined by Duncan's multiple range test (n = 03).
Effect of formulation on antinutritional factors of Nnam gon
| Parameters (/100 g DM) | Formula/Samples | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F0 | F1 | F2 | F3 | |
| Phenolics compound (mg) | 310.55 ± 5.62a | 467.01 ± 9.71b | 592.80 ± 3.96d | 534.40 ± 4.71c |
| Oxalates (mg) | 1.41 ± 0.01a | 2.57 ± 0.01b | 3.30 ± 0.01d | 2.83 ± 0.01c |
| Phytates (mg) | 2.23 ± 0.07a | 12.49 ± 0.09b | 11.04 ± 1.26b | 11.04 ± 1.26b |
| Tannins (mg) | 131.59 ± 6.26a | 369.11 ± 11.41b | 527.44 ± 3.24d | 459.68 ± 11.41c |
Mean ± SD values with different letters within the same line differed significantly (p < .05) as determined by Duncan's multiple range test (n = 03).
Figure 2Effect of formulation on DPPH antiradical scavenging (a) reducing power (b) and chelating power (c) of Nnam gon. Mean ± SD (n = 3) followed by different letters is significantly different (p < .05) as determined by Duncan's multiple range test
Effect of formulation on textural parameters of Nnam gon
| Parameters | Formula/Samples | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F0 | F1 | F2 | F3 | |
| Cylindrical probe | ||||
| Hardness (N) | 8.46 ± 0.14b | 5.97 ± 0.13a | 9.57 ± 0.17c | 8.60 ± 0.04b |
| Adhesivity (N) | 3.19 ± 0.50a | 4.49 ± 0.32b | 6.80 ± 0.26c | 4.75 ± 0.13b |
| Viscoelasticity index | 3.12 ± 0.12c | 1.58 ± 0.19a | 1.86 ± 0.01a | 2.26 ± 0.08b |
| Conical probe | ||||
| Hardness (N) | 8.25 ± 0.03c | 3.31 ± 0.25a | 6.74 ± 0.43b | 8.98 ± 0.02d |
| Adhesivity (N) | 5.80 ± 0.02b | 4.59 ± 0.23a | 6.69 ± 0.49c | 8.72 ± 0.37d |
| Viscoelasticity index | 2.56 ± 0.18c | 1.26 ± 0.06a | 2.24 ± 0.18b | 2.42 ± 0.16bc |
Mean ± SD values with different letters within the same line differed significantly (p < .05) as determined by Duncan's multiple range test (n = 03).
Sensory describing terms developed for Nnam gon samples
| Sensory describing terms | Definitions | References |
|---|---|---|
| Appearance | ||
| Color | Scale from white to green | 0—White paper20—green leave |
| Porosity | Number of visible pores in the cake | 0—shell of the egg20—dry sponge |
| Smooth | Smooth aspect | 0—shell of the egg20—pellicle of pineapple |
| Odor | ||
| Cucurbitaceae seeds | Sensation of Cucurbitaceae seeds | 0—potable water20—Cucurbitaceae seeds flour |
| Spices | Sensation of spices | 0—potable water20—spice powder |
| Wrapping leaves | Sensation of Wrapping leaves | 0—potable water20—Wrapping leaves powder |
| Fresh fish | Sensation of Fresh fish | 0—potable water20—fresh fish paste |
| Dried shrimps | Sensation of Dried shrimps | 0—potable water20—Dried shrimps powder |
| Musty | Sensation of musty | 0—potable water20—moldy bread |
| Taste | ||
| Cucurbitaceae seeds | Sensation of Cucurbitaceae seeds in the mouth | 0—potable water20—cucurbit seeds flour |
| Persistence of Cucurbitaceae seeds | Taste of Cucurbitaceae seeds that remains in the mouth after rinsing with water | 0—potable water20—cucurbit seeds flour |
| Salty | Intensity of salt | 0—potable water20—salt water (0.2 g/ml) |
| Spices | Sensation of spices | 0—potable water20—spice powder |
| Wrapping leaves | Sensation of Wrapping leaves | 0—potable water20—Wrapping leaves powder |
| Bitter | Bitter taste that remains in the mouth | 0—potable water20—fresh aloes vera paste |
| Bitter after taste | Bitter taste that remains in the mouth after rinsing with water | 0—potable water20—fresh aloes vera paste |
| Flavor | ||
| Cucurbitaceae seeds | Intensity of Cucurbitaceae seeds taste | 0—potable water20—cucurbit seeds flour |
| Dried shrimps | Intensity of Dried shrimps taste | 0—potable water20—Dried shrimps powder |
| Wrapping leaves | Intensity of Wrapping leaves taste | 0—potable water20—Wrapping leaves powder |
| Texture | ||
| Hardness | Strength applied on the cake to break it | 0—wheat cake20—cookies |
| Cohesivity | Facility of cake particles to be separated | 0—wheat cake20—cookies |
| Juiciness | Sensation of humidity on finger | 0—bread20—slice of fresh pineapple |
| Elasticity | Capacity of the cake to return at the start point after a pressure between the fingers | 0—cheese20—dry sponge |
| Oily | Perception of oil between the fingers | 0—bread20—cheese |
| Granulous | Perception of granules between the fingers | 0—cookies20—dakere (semolia) |
| Oral texture | ||
| Juiciness | Humidity in mouth | 0—bread20—slice of pineapple |
| Masticability | Strength applied on the cake to break it in the mouth | 0—cheese20—cookies |
Mean quantitative analysis scores for Nnam gon samples
| Attributes | Formulation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F0 | F1 | F2 | F3 | MSD | ||
| Appearance | Color | 1.50a | 1.79a | 2.51a | 2.31a | 0.51 |
| Porosity | 6.02a | 6.99a | 8.95b | 7.79ab | 0.73 | |
| Smooth | 10.80a | 10.10a | 7.52a | 8.55a | 0.71 | |
| Odor | Cucurbitaceae seeds | 11.98b | 11.93b | 9.76a | 9.88a | 0.76 |
| Spices | 1.00a | 5.57b | 7.38c | 6.73bc | 0.88 | |
| Wrapping leaves | 5.49a | 5.51a | 4.94a | 4.60a | 0.85 | |
| Fresh fish | 0.00a | 6.94b | 5.94b | 5.49b | 0.83 | |
| Dried shrimps | 0.00a | 6.16b | 0.00a | 5.89b | 0.79 | |
| Musty | 1.87a | 1.50a | 1.28a | 1.41a | 0.72 | |
| Taste | Cucurbitaceae seeds | 14.20b | 10.95a | 11.36a | 12.45a | 0.70 |
| Persistence of Cucurbitaceae seeds | 11.12a | 11.08a | 10.17a | 10.51a | 0.69 | |
| Salty | 8.54a | 8.55a | 8.57a | 8.86a | 0.59 | |
| Spices | 0.00a | 5.97ab | 12.18b | 6.91a | 0.82 | |
| Wrapping leaves | 5.30a | 5.41a | 5.99b | 5.95b | 0.78 | |
| Bitter | 0.00a | 0.00a | 0.00a | 0.00a | 0.64 | |
| Bitter after taste | 0.00a | 0.00a | 0.00a | 0.00a | 0.64 | |
| Flavor | Cucurbitaceae seeds | 10.30a | 9.51a | 9.35a | 9.50a | 0.72 |
| Dried shrimps | 0.00a | 5.75b | 0.00a | 5.76b | 0.73 | |
| Wrapping leaves | 5.25a | 5.41a | 5.99a | 5.95a | 0.78 | |
| Texture | Hardness | 10.98a | 11.77a | 10.09a | 10.97a | 0.69 |
| Cohesivity | 11.02b | 10.93b | 8.90a | 9.31a | 0.77 | |
| Juiciness | 7.69a | 7.79a | 8.46a | 7.61a | 0.84 | |
| Elasticity | 8.92a | 8.90a | 8.79a | 8.88a | 0.70 | |
| Oily | 7.49a | 7.51a | 8.10a | 7.51a | 0.75 | |
| Granulous | 8.05a | 8.01a | 7.67a | 7.67a | 0.77 | |
| Oral texture | Juiciness | 7.10a | 7.02a | 8.12a | 7.60a | 0.82 |
| Masticability | 9.10b | 9.09b | 7.94ab | 6.61a | 0.66 | |
Means with the same letters on the same line are not significantly different (p ≤ .05) and MSD = minimum significant difference (Duncan test of averages).
Figure 3Biplot (CP1 and CP2) describing the mapping of formula and correlations between sensory attributes (black color) and chemical composition (blue color) of Nnam gon samples
Figure 4Effect of formulation on general acceptance of Nnam gon. Mean ± standard deviation of general acceptance is based on a nine‐point hedonic scale with 1 = dislike extremely to 9 = like extremely. Mean ± SD values with different letters differed significantly (p < .05) as determined by Duncan's multiple range test (n = 50)