Stefanie N Hinkle1, Shristi Rawal, Yeyi Zhu, Jagteshwar Grewal, Paul S Albert, Cuilin Zhang. 1. From the aEpidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; bDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA; cOffice of the Director, Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; and dBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Branch, Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Self-report is often used in identifying gestational diabetes events in epidemiologic studies; however, validity data are limited, with little to no data on self-reported severity or treatment. METHODS: We aimed to assess the validity of self-reported gestational diabetes diagnosis and evaluate the accuracy of glucose diagnosis results and gestational diabetes treatment self-reported at 6-week postpartum. Data were from 82 and 83 women with and without gestational diabetes, respectively, within the prospective National Institute Child Health and Human Development Fetal Growth Studies-Singletons (2009-2013). Medical record data were considered the gold standard. RESULTS: Sensitivity was 95% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 88, 98), and specificity was 100% (95% CI = 96, 100); four women with gestational diabetes incorrectly reported not having the disease, and none of the women without gestational diabetes reported having gestational diabetes. Sensitivity did not vary substantially across maternal characteristics including race/ethnicity. For women who attempted to recall their values (84/159 women), self-reported glucose challenge test results did not differ from the medical records (median difference: 0; interquartile range: 0-0 mg/dl). Medical records indicated that 42 (54%) of 78 women with confirmed gestational diabetes were treated by diet only and 33 (42%) were treated by medication. All 42 women with diet-treated gestational diabetes correctly reported having had diet and lifestyle modification, and 28 (85%) of 33 women with medication-treated gestational diabetes indicated postpartum that they had medication treatment. CONCLUSIONS: At 6-week postpartum, regardless of race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status, women accurately recalled whether they had gestational diabetes and, as applicable, their treatment method.
BACKGROUND: Self-report is often used in identifying gestational diabetes events in epidemiologic studies; however, validity data are limited, with little to no data on self-reported severity or treatment. METHODS: We aimed to assess the validity of self-reported gestational diabetes diagnosis and evaluate the accuracy of glucose diagnosis results and gestational diabetes treatment self-reported at 6-week postpartum. Data were from 82 and 83 women with and without gestational diabetes, respectively, within the prospective National Institute Child Health and Human Development Fetal Growth Studies-Singletons (2009-2013). Medical record data were considered the gold standard. RESULTS: Sensitivity was 95% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 88, 98), and specificity was 100% (95% CI = 96, 100); four women with gestational diabetes incorrectly reported not having the disease, and none of the women without gestational diabetes reported having gestational diabetes. Sensitivity did not vary substantially across maternal characteristics including race/ethnicity. For women who attempted to recall their values (84/159 women), self-reported glucose challenge test results did not differ from the medical records (median difference: 0; interquartile range: 0-0 mg/dl). Medical records indicated that 42 (54%) of 78 women with confirmed gestational diabetes were treated by diet only and 33 (42%) were treated by medication. All 42 women with diet-treated gestational diabetes correctly reported having had diet and lifestyle modification, and 28 (85%) of 33 women with medication-treated gestational diabetes indicated postpartum that they had medication treatment. CONCLUSIONS: At 6-week postpartum, regardless of race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status, women accurately recalled whether they had gestational diabetes and, as applicable, their treatment method.
Authors: C G Solomon; W C Willett; J Rich-Edwards; D J Hunter; M J Stampfer; G A Colditz; J E Manson Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1996-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Patricia Dietz; Jennifer Bombard; Candace Mulready-Ward; John Gauthier; Judith Sackoff; Peggy Brozicevic; Melissa Gambatese; Michael Nyland-Funke; Lucinda England; Leslie Harrison; Allan Taylor Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2014-12
Authors: Germaine M Buck Louis; Jagteshwar Grewal; Paul S Albert; Anthony Sciscione; Deborah A Wing; William A Grobman; Roger B Newman; Ronald Wapner; Mary E D'Alton; Daniel Skupski; Michael P Nageotte; Angela C Ranzini; John Owen; Edward K Chien; Sabrina Craigo; Mary L Hediger; Sungduk Kim; Cuilin Zhang; Katherine L Grantz Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Boyd E Metzger; Lynn P Lowe; Alan R Dyer; Elisabeth R Trimble; Udom Chaovarindr; Donald R Coustan; David R Hadden; David R McCance; Moshe Hod; Harold David McIntyre; Jeremy J N Oats; Bengt Persson; Michael S Rogers; David A Sacks Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-05-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Yeyi Zhu; Sjurdur F Olsen; Pauline Mendola; Edwina H Yeung; Allan Vaag; Katherine Bowers; Aiyi Liu; Wei Bao; Shanshan Li; Camilla Madsen; Louise G Grunnet; Charlotta Granström; Susanne Hansen; Kelly Martin; Jorge E Chavarro; Frank B Hu; Jens Langhoff-Roos; Peter Damm; Cuilin Zhang Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Lindsay M Jaacks; Dana Boyd Barr; Rajeshwari Sundaram; José M Maisog; Cuilin Zhang; Germaine M Buck Louis Journal: Environ Health Date: 2016-01-20 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Noelle E Carlozzi; Nicholas R Boileau; Joel S Perlmutter; Kelvin L Chou; Julie C Stout; Jane S Paulsen; Michael K McCormack; David Cella; Martha A Nance; Jin-Shei Lai; Praveen Dayalu Journal: J Neurol Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Yiqing Song; Chen Lyu; Ming Li; Mohammad L Rahman; Zhen Chen; Yeyi Zhu; Stefanie N Hinkle; Liwei Chen; Susanna D Mitro; Ling-Jun Li; Natalie L Weir; Michael Y Tsai; Cuilin Zhang Journal: Metabolites Date: 2021-12-17