Literature DB >> 28569386

Risk score to assess mortality risk in patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction.

Ewa Oszczygieł1, Andrzej Kutarski2, Andrzej Oszczygieł3, Beata Mańkowska-Załuska3, Michał Chudzik3, Jerzy Krzysztof Wranicz3, Iwona Cygankiewicz3.   

Abstract

AIMS: The main aim of this study was to assess 1-year mortality and its predictors in a cohort of patients who underwent transvenous lead extraction (TLE) procedure.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics and 1-year follow-up of patients referred for a TLE procedure in a single, high-volume center between June 2006 and October 2014 was performed.
RESULTS: The studied population included 130 patients (82 males; mean age 64 ± 15 years) implanted with pacemakers (74%), implantable cardioverter defibrillators (15%), or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (11%). Indications for the extraction included infective endocarditis (40.5%), pocket infection (18.5%), and lead fault or failure (41%). Total radiological success rate was 90% while clinical success rate was 93.5%. The cumulative 1-year mortality was 28%. Mortality was higher in a group of older patients (94.4% vs 68%, P = 0.001) and those with chronic kidney disease (33.3% vs 4.3 %, P = 0.0002) as well as in patients after removal of high voltage lead (88.9% vs 26.3%, P = 0.01). Higher mortality was also related to infection as an indication for TLE (37.2% vs 13.5%, P = 0.002). Following these findings a new risk score model named IKAR (I = infective indications; K = kidney dysfunction; A = age ≥ 56; R = removal of high voltage lead) was constructed. Patients with IKAR score ≥3 points were characterized by 79% mortality as compared to 16% in those with a score 1-2 points.
CONCLUSIONS: One-year mortality of patients undergoing TLE procedure can be predicted by using IKAR risk score.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac device infective endocarditis; mortality; pacemakers; risk score; transvenous lead extraction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28569386     DOI: 10.1111/pace.13127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  3 in total

1.  Transvenous lead extraction: Can it be simple yet safe?

Authors:  Antonios P Antoniadis; Vassilios P Vassilikos
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.596

2.  Transesophageal Echocardiography As a Monitoring Tool During Transvenous Lead Extraction-Does It Improve Procedure Effectiveness?

Authors:  Dorota Nowosielecka; Wojciech Jacheć; Anna Polewczyk; Łukasz Tułecki; Konrad Tomków; Paweł Stefańczyk; Andrzej Tomaszewski; Wojciech Brzozowski; Dorota Szcześniak-Stańczyk; Andrzej Kleinrok; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Transvenous Lead Extraction SAFeTY Score for Risk Stratification and Proper Patient Selection for Removal Procedures Using Mechanical Tools.

Authors:  Wojciech Jacheć; Anna Polewczyk; Maciej Polewczyk; Andrzej Tomasik; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.