Literature DB >> 28569062

Scalable Device for Automated Microbial Electroporation in a Digital Microfluidic Platform.

Andrew C Madison1, Matthew W Royal1, Frederic Vigneault2, Liji Chen1, Peter B Griffin3, Mark Horowitz, George M Church2,4, Richard B Fair1.   

Abstract

Electrowetting-on-dielectric (EWD) digital microfluidic laboratory-on-a-chip platforms demonstrate excellent performance in automating labor-intensive protocols. When coupled with an on-chip electroporation capability, these systems hold promise for streamlining cumbersome processes such as multiplex automated genome engineering (MAGE). We integrated a single Ti:Au electroporation electrode into an otherwise standard parallel-plate EWD geometry to enable high-efficiency transformation of Escherichia coli with reporter plasmid DNA in a 200 nL droplet. Test devices exhibited robust operation with more than 10 transformation experiments performed per device without cross-contamination or failure. Despite intrinsic electric-field nonuniformity present in the EP/EWD device, the peak on-chip transformation efficiency was measured to be 8.6 ± 1.0 × 108 cfu·μg-1 for an average applied electric field strength of 2.25 ± 0.50 kV·mm-1. Cell survival and transformation fractions at this electroporation pulse strength were found to be 1.5 ± 0.3 and 2.3 ± 0.1%, respectively. Our work expands the EWD toolkit to include on-chip microbial electroporation and opens the possibility of scaling advanced genome engineering methods, like MAGE, into the submicroliter regime.

Entities:  

Keywords:  digital microfluidics; droplet; electroporation; transformation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28569062     DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.7b00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Synth Biol        ISSN: 2161-5063            Impact factor:   5.110


  7 in total

1.  Is microfluidics the "assembly line" for CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing?

Authors:  Fatemeh Ahmadi; Angela B V Quach; Steve C C Shih
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Recombineering and MAGE.

Authors:  Timothy M Wannier; Peter N Ciaccia; Andrew D Ellington; Gabriel T Filsinger; Farren J Isaacs; Kamyab Javanmardi; Michaela A Jones; Aditya M Kunjapur; Akos Nyerges; Csaba Pal; Max G Schubert; George M Church
Journal:  Nat Rev Methods Primers       Date:  2021-01-14

3.  Acoustofluidic medium exchange for preparation of electrocompetent bacteria using channel wall trapping.

Authors:  M S Gerlt; P Ruppen; M Leuthner; S Panke; J Dual
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  Scalable and automated CRISPR-based strain engineering using droplet microfluidics.

Authors:  Kosuke Iwai; Maren Wehrs; Megan Garber; Jess Sustarich; Lauren Washburn; Zachary Costello; Peter W Kim; David Ando; William R Gaillard; Nathan J Hillson; Paul D Adams; Aindrila Mukhopadhyay; Hector Garcia Martin; Anup K Singh
Journal:  Microsyst Nanoeng       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 7.127

5.  M-TUBE enables large-volume bacterial gene delivery using a high-throughput microfluidic electroporation platform.

Authors:  Po-Hsun Huang; Sijie Chen; Anthony L Shiver; Rebecca Neal Culver; Kerwyn Casey Huang; Cullen R Buie
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 9.593

Review 6.  Microfluidic and Nanofluidic Intracellular Delivery.

Authors:  Jeongsoo Hur; Aram J Chung
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 16.806

7.  Effect of Electrode Shape and Flow Conditions on the Electrochemical Detection with Band Microelectrodes.

Authors:  Maher Al Khatib; Marco Bellini; Rebecca Pogni; Andrea Giaccherini; Massimo Innocenti; Francesco Vizza; Alessandro Lavacchi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.