Literature DB >> 28569014

EFFECTS OF A HAEMATOPHAGOUS MITE ON THE BARN SWALLOW (HIRUNDO RUSTICA): A TEST OF THE HAMILTON AND ZUK HYPOTHESIS.

Anders Pape Møller1.   

Abstract

I tested three assumptions of the Hamilton and Zuk hypothesis (1982), which suggests that the extravagant male plumage of many bird species allows females to choose mates that are resistant to the parasites exploiting the host population at a given time. By choosing such males as mates, females will rear offspring carrying the genes for resistance. I tested three necessary conditions for the Hamilton and Zuk model: (1) whether parasites affect the fitness of their hosts; (2) whether there is heritable variation in parasite resistance, and (3) whether the expression of the sexual ornament varies with parasite burden. The haematophagous mite Ornithonyssus bursa (Macronyssidae, Gamasida) sucks blood from their Barn Swallow (Hirundo rustica) hosts. Experimental manipulation of mite loads and partial cross-fostering experiments on Barn Swallows, where half of the nestlings in the brood were exchanged with nestlings from another nest, shows that parasite burdens and origin, but not rearing conditions, of Bam Swallow nestlings, affected their adult tarsus length and maximum body weight shortly before fledging. Mite loads of adult Barn Swallows at spring arrival were more similar to mite loads of their own offspring, whether reared in their own or in foster nests inoculated with mites, than to loads of foster offspring. Parent Barn Swallows with long tail ornaments had offspring with smaller mite loads in the partial cross-fostering experiments. The amount of increase in male tail ornaments from one year to another was negatively related to experimentally manipulated mite loads of Barn Swallow nests during the preceding breeding season. In conclusion, the three assumptions of the hypothesis were supported by the experimental tests. © 1990 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 28569014     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb03804.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  9 in total

1.  Immune responsiveness in adult blue tits: heritability and effects of nutritional status during ontogeny.

Authors:  Lars Råberg; Martin Stjernman; Dennis Hasselquist
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Ectoparasites and host energetics: house martin bugs and house martin nestlings.

Authors:  A P Møller; F de Lope; J Moreno; G González; J J Pérez
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Age-specific patterns of infection with haemosporidians and trypanosomes in a warbler: implications for sexual selection.

Authors:  Corey R Freeman-Gallant; Conor C Taff
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Hamilton and Zuk meet heterozygosity? Song repertoire size indicates inbreeding and immunity in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia).

Authors:  Janem Reid; Peter Arcese; Alicel E V Cassidy; Amyb Marr; Jamesn M Smith; Lukasf Keller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Sexual selection and physical attractiveness : Implications for mating dynamics.

Authors:  S W Gangestad
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1993-09

6.  Human facial beauty : Averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance.

Authors:  R Thornhill; S W Gangestad
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1993-09

7.  Protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii manipulates mate choice in rats by enhancing attractiveness of males.

Authors:  Shantala Arundathi Hari Dass; Anand Vasudevan; Deborah Dutta; Linda Jing Ting Soh; Robert Morris Sapolsky; Ajai Vyas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Smelling fit: scent marking exposes parasitic infection status in the banded mongoose.

Authors:  Jessica Mitchell; Michael A Cant; Emma I K Vitikainen; Hazel J Nichols
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.624

9.  Aphid-encoded variability in susceptibility to a parasitoid.

Authors:  Adam J Martinez; Shannon G Ritter; Matthew R Doremus; Jacob A Russell; Kerry M Oliver
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.260

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.