Literature DB >> 28568728

EVOLUTIONARY EFFECTS OF SELECTION ON AGE AT REPRODUCTION IN LARVAL AND ADULT: DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Caroline Roper1, Patricia Pignatelli1, Linda Partridge1.   

Abstract

Two sets of three replicate lines of Drosophila melanogaster were artificially selected by reproduction at either a 'young' or an 'old' age. The pure lines, the hybrids between the lines within a selection regimen and the base stock from which the lines were derived were compared for longevity, early and late fertility, development time, larval viability and adult thorax length. Comparison of hybrid with pure lines showed some evidence for inbreeding depression in the lines from both selection regimes. Comparison of hybrid lines with the base stock did not provide evidence for any trade-off in either males or females between early fertility on the one hand and late life fertility and longevity on the other. Nor was there any clear evidence of a trade-off between pre-adult and adult fitness components. There was evidence of inadvertent selection for rapid development in both selection regimens, especially in the females of the 'young' lines, and this complicated the interpretation of the responses and correlated responses to selection. An improvement in adult performance in the 'old' line males relative to the base stock appeared to be attributable to reversal of mutation accumulation. Comparison of the hybrid 'young' and 'old' lines with the base stock did not support the idea that the superior longevity and late life fertility of the 'old' lines relative to the 'young' lines could be accounted for by the effects of mutation accumulation in the 'young' lines. The results point to the need to compare selected lines with their base stock when deducing responses and correlated responses to selection and to avoid unintentional selection. In this type of experiment, larval density should be standardized during selection, and adults should not be under pressure for rapid maturation. © 1993 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Drosophila melanogaster; larval development; mutation accumulation; pleiotropy; reproduction; selection; survival

Year:  1993        PMID: 28568728     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb02105.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  8 in total

Review 1.  p53: 800 million years of evolution and 40 years of discovery.

Authors:  Arnold J Levine
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  Evolution of aging: testing the theory using Drosophila.

Authors:  L Partridge; N H Barton
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 3.  Mutations and quantitative genetic variation: lessons from Drosophila.

Authors:  Trudy F C Mackay
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Homogeneity of agriculture landscape promotes insecticide resistance in the ground beetle Poecilus cupreus.

Authors:  Grzegorz Sowa; Agnieszka J Bednarska; Elżbieta Ziółkowska; Ryszard Laskowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  The devil in the details of life-history evolution: instability and reversal of genetic correlations during selection on Drosophila development.

Authors:  Adam K Chippindale; Anh L Ngo; Michael R Rose
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

6.  Probing the evolution of senescence in Drosophila melanogaster with P-element tagging.

Authors:  A G Clark; R N Guadalupe
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 7.  What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us?

Authors:  N G Prasad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003 Apr-Aug       Impact factor: 1.166

8.  Evolution of delayed reproductive senescence in male fruit flies: sperm competition.

Authors:  P M Service; A J Fales
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.082

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.