Literature DB >> 28568633

EXPERIMENTAL EVOLUTION OF ACCELERATED DEVELOPMENT IN DROSOPHILA. 1. DEVELOPMENTAL SPEED AND LARVAL SURVIVAL.

Adam K Chippindale1, Julie A Alipaz1, Hsiao-Wei Chen1, Michael R Rose1.   

Abstract

Developmental time is a trait of great relevance to fitness in all organisms. In holometabolous species that occupy ephemeral habitat, like Drosophila melanogaster, the impact of developmental time upon fitness is further exaggerated. We explored the trade-offs surrounding developmental time by selecting 10 independent populations from two distantly related selection treatments (CB1-5 and CO1-5 ) for faster development. After 125 generations, the resulting accelerated populations (ACB1-5 and ACO1-5 ) displayed net selection responses for development time of -33.4 hours (or 15%) for ACB and -38.6 hours (or 17%) for ACO. Since most of the change in egg-to-adult developmental time was accounted for by changes in larval duration, the "accelerated" larvae were estimated to develop 25-30% faster than their control/ancestor populations. The responses of ACB and ACO lines were remarkably parallel, despite being founded from populations evolved independently for more than 300 generations. On average, these "A" populations developed from egg to adult in less than eight days and produced fertile eggs less than 24 hours after emerging. Accelerated populations showed no change in larval feeding rate, but a reduction in pupation height, the latter being a trait relating to larval energetic expenditure in wandering prior to pupation. This experiment demonstrates the existence of a negative evolutionary correlation between preadult developmental time and viability, as accelerated populations experienced a severe cost in preadult survivorship. In the final assay generation, viability of accelerated treatments had declined by more than 10%, on average. A diallel cross demonstrated that the loss of viability in the ACO lines was not due to inbreeding depression. These results suggest the existence of a rapid development syndrome, in which the fitness benefits of fast development are balanced by fitness costs resulting from reduced preadult survivorship, marginal larval storage of metabolites, and reduced adult size. © 1997 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Development; Drosophila; developmental time; life-history evolution; selection; trade-offs; viability

Year:  1997        PMID: 28568633     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01477.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  22 in total

1.  K-selection, alpha-selection, effectiveness, and tolerance in competition: density-dependent selection revisited.

Authors:  A Joshi; N G Prasad; M Shakarad
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Quantitative genetics of functional characters in Drosophila melanogaster populations subjected to laboratory selection.

Authors:  Henrique Teotónio; Margarida Matos; Michael R Rose
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Potential constraints on evolution: sexual dimorphism and the problem of protandry in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana.

Authors:  Bas J Zwaan; Wilte G Zijlstra; Marieke Keller; Jeroen Pijpe; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  A possible tradeoff between developmental rate and pathogen resistance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Shampa Ghosh Modak; K M Satish; J Mohan; Sutirth Dey; N Raghavendra; Mallikarjun Shakarad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.166

5.  Experimental Evolution and Heart Function in Drosophila.

Authors:  Parvin Shahrestani; Molly K Burke; Ryan Birse; James N Kezos; Karen Ocorr; Laurence D Mueller; Michael R Rose; Rolf Bodmer
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.247

6.  Enhancement of larval immune system traits as a correlated response to selection for rapid development in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Punyatirtha Dey; Kanika Mendiratta; Joy Bose; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.166

7.  Circadian clocks and life-history related traits: is pupation height affected by circadian organization in Drosophila melanogaster?

Authors:  Dhanashree A Paranjpe; D Anitha; Vijay Kumar Sharma; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.166

8.  Stage-specific effects of candidate heterochronic genes on variation in developmental time along an altitudinal cline of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Julián Mensch; Valeria Carreira; Nicolás Lavagnino; Julieta Goenaga; Guillermo Folguera; Esteban Hasson; Juan José Fanara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The contribution of ancestry, chance, and past and ongoing selection to adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Amitabh Joshi; Robinson B Castillo; Laurence D Mueller
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

10.  Latitudinal clines in Drosophila melanogaster: body size, allozyme frequencies, inversion frequencies, and the insulin-signalling pathway.

Authors:  Gerdien De Jong; Zoltán Bochdanovits
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.