Literature DB >> 28568581

NEGATIVE FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT SELECTION BY POLLINATORS ON ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS WITHOUT REWARDS.

Ann Smithson1, Mark R Macnair1.   

Abstract

Many species of nonmodel deceptively pollinated orchids are polymorphic for corolla color. These species are pollinated by naive insects searching for nectar, and are not mimics. It has been suggested that the foraging behavior of insect pollinators during the avoidance learning process results in these stable corolla color polymorphisms; for this to occur pollinators must induce negative frequency-dependent selection on corolla color. Therefore the hypothesis that pollinator behavior results in a preference for rare color morphs of deceptive species was tested experimentally. Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) foraged in the laboratory on arrays of artificial flowers with different corolla color morphs. Morphs were varied in frequency, and bumblebee preferences were recorded on arrays where morphs did and did not contain sucrose solution rewards. Bumblebees preferred the most common color morph when flowers contained sucrose solution rewards, but overvisited rare morphs when sampling flowers that contained no rewards. Bumblebees also tended to move between unlike color morphs when these were unrewarding, suggesting that a probabilistic sampling strategy was adopted. Thus experiments demonstrated that pollinator behavior could result in a selective advantage for rare color morphs of plant species that are pollinated by deception without mimicry, which would induce negative frequency-dependent selection on corolla color. The observed pollinator behavior could allow stable corolla color polymorphisms to be maintained by selection in nonmodel deceptively pollinated species. © 1997 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bombus terrestris; deceptive pollination; disassortative mating; orchids; sampling behavior

Year:  1997        PMID: 28568581     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb03655.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  14 in total

1.  Does flower color variation matter in deception pollinated Psychilis monensis (Orchidaceae)?

Authors:  Susan Aragón; James D Ackerman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Nectarless flowers: ecological correlates and evolutionary stability.

Authors:  Juilee D Thakar; Krushnamegh Kunte; Anisha K Chauhan; Aparna V Watve; Milind G Watve
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-06-28       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Flower color polymorphism maintained by overdominant selection in Sisyrinchium sp.

Authors:  Yuma Takahashi; Koh-ichi Takakura; Masakado Kawata
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.629

4.  Colour preferences of Tetragonula carbonaria Sm. stingless bees for colour morphs of the Australian native orchid Caladenia carnea.

Authors:  Adrian G Dyer; Skye Boyd-Gerny; Mani Shrestha; Jair E Garcia; Casper J van der Kooi; Bob B M Wong
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  The effects of floral mimics and models on each others' fitness.

Authors:  Bruce Anderson; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Experimental investigation of the effect of spatial aggregation on reproductive success in a rewardless orchid.

Authors:  Antonina I Internicola; Nicolas Juillet; Ann Smithson; Luc D B Gigord
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The co-optimization of floral display and nectar reward.

Authors:  Prajakta V Belsare; Balasubramanian Sriram; Milind G Watve
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 8.  Understanding intraspecific variation of floral scent in light of evolutionary ecology.

Authors:  Roxane Delle-Vedove; Bertrand Schatz; Mathilde Dufay
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Variability in floral scent in rewarding and deceptive orchids: the signature of pollinator-imposed selection?

Authors:  Charlotte C Salzmann; Antonio M Nardella; Salvatore Cozzolino; Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Say it with flowers: flowering acceleration by root communication.

Authors:  Omer Falik; Ishay Hoffmann; Ariel Novoplansky
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2014-03-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.