Literature DB >> 14666418

Does flower color variation matter in deception pollinated Psychilis monensis (Orchidaceae)?

Susan Aragón1, James D Ackerman.   

Abstract

Negative frequency dependent selection (FDS) had been proposed as a mechanism for the maintenance of the high levels of variability in floral traits of rewardless plants. Thus far the evidence has been equivocal for discontinuous traits. We experimentally tested the FDS hypothesis for continuous variation in flower color of Psychilis monensis, a rewardless, epiphytic orchid of Mona Island, Puerto Rico. P. monensis flowers all year long with a peak in June and July. Plants are self-incompatible. Individual flowers last 9-15 days if unpollinated. Over a 9-month observation of an unmanipulated population, a high percentage of plants showed pollinarium removals (79%) and fruit initiation (63%), but the actual percentage of flowers visited was very low (12%) and final fruit set was as low as the lowest recorded for orchids (2.4%). In a FDS experiment using a Latin Square design, we manipulated flower color in three populations. Over 50% of the variation in either male or female reproductive success was explained by time and site with no significant effect of treatment except as part of a three-way interaction of time x site x treatment. Paired comparisons with the controls gave equivocal results for both male and female measures of reproductive success. Major community changes had occurred during the FDS experiment with flower activity falling dramatically and by the third run of the experiment, only P. monensis was in flower. Coincidentally, the numbers of effective visits increased with time, presumably as pollinators became less discriminating in search of new food resources. Thus, negative frequency dependent selection is either sporadic or non-existent. Reproductive success was statistically related to locality and date, which was reflected in the flowering phenology of the local communities. High natural levels of color variation may be more influenced by drift than selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14666418     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1443-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  Negative frequency-dependent selection maintains a dramatic flower color polymorphism in the rewardless orchid Dactylorhiza sambucina (L.) Soo.

Authors:  L D Gigord; M R Macnair; A Smithson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Floral evolution: attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness.

Authors:  M L Stanton; A A Snow; S N Handel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-06-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Variation in pollinator abundance and selection on fragrance phenotypes in an epiphytic orchid.

Authors:  J Ackerman; E Melendez-Ackerman; J Salguero-Faria
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.844

4.  BEE FLOWERS: A HYPOTHESIS ON FLOWER VARIETY AND BLOOMING TIMES.

Authors:  Bernd Heinrich
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  The effect of nectar guides on pollinator preference: experimental studies with a montane herb.

Authors:  Nickolas M Waser; Mary V Price
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  NEGATIVE FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT SELECTION BY POLLINATORS ON ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS WITHOUT REWARDS.

Authors:  Ann Smithson; Mark R Macnair
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Resource heterogeneity and patterns of movement in foraging bumblebees.

Authors:  Bernd Heinrich
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF FLOWER COLOR AND INTER-TRAIT CORRELATIONS IN AN IPOMOPSIS HYBRID ZONE.

Authors:  Elvia Meléndez-Ackerman; Diane R Campbell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT VARIATION FOR OUTCROSSING RATE AMONG FLOWER-COLOR MORPHS OF IPOMOEA PURPUREA.

Authors:  Bryan K Epperson; Michael T Clegg
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  MEASURING POLLINATOR-MEDIATED SELECTION ON MORPHOMETRIC FLORAL TRAITS: BUMBLEBEES AND THE ALPINE SKY PILOT, POLEMONIUM VISCOSUM.

Authors:  Candace Galen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.694

  10 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  On the success of a swindle: pollination by deception in orchids.

Authors:  Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-06

2.  On the roles of colour and scent in a specialized floral mimicry system.

Authors:  Nicolas J Vereecken; Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Phenology and phenotypic natural selection on the flowering time of a deceit-pollinated tropical orchid, Myrmecophila christinae.

Authors:  Victor Parra-Tabla; Carlos F Vargas
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2004-06-17       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Variability in floral scent in rewarding and deceptive orchids: the signature of pollinator-imposed selection?

Authors:  Charlotte C Salzmann; Antonio M Nardella; Salvatore Cozzolino; Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Pollinators on Cowpea Vigna unguiculata: Implications for Intercropping to Enhance Biodiversity.

Authors:  Beatrice N Dingha; Louis E Jackai; Barbara A Amoah; Clement Akotsen-Mensah
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 2.769

6.  Effects of pollination limitation and seed predation on female reproductive success of a deceptive orchid.

Authors:  Ryan P Walsh; Paige M Arnold; Helen J Michaels
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 3.276

7.  Pollinator responses to floral colour change, nectar, and scent promote reproductive fitness in Quisqualis indica (Combretaceae).

Authors:  Juan Yan; Gang Wang; Yi Sui; Menglin Wang; Ling Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Fluctuating selection across years and phenotypic variation in food-deceptive orchids.

Authors:  Giovanni Scopece; Nicolas Juillet; Christian Lexer; Salvatore Cozzolino
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.