Fang-Ying Su1, Yi-Hwei Li1, Yen-Po Lin2, Chung-Jen Lee3, Chih-Hung Wang4, Fan-Chun Meng4, Yun-Shun Yu5, Felicia Lin5, Hsien-Tsai Wu6, Gen-Min Lin4,5,6. 1. Department of Public Health, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Tzu Chi General Hospital, Taipei branch, New Taipei City, Taiwan. 3. Department of Nursing, Tzu Chi College of Technology, Hualien, Taiwan. 4. Department of Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan. 5. Department of Electrical Engineering, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien, Taiwan. 6. Department of Medicine, Hualien-Armed Forces General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Cornell and Sokolow-Lyon electrocardiography (ECG) criteria have been widely used for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in patients with hypertension. However, the correlations of these ECG criteria with LVH were rarely compared in military members who received rigorous training, particularly of the Asian male population. METHODS: We compared the Cornell voltage and product criteria with the Sokolow-Lyon criteria for the echocardiographic LVH in 539 military male members, ages 18-50 years and free of hypertension in the Cardiorespiratory fitness and HospItalization Events in armed Forces (CHIEF) study in Taiwan. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to determine the association of each ECG criterion with the index of left ventricular mass (LVM, g)/height (m)2.7. The sensitivities and specificities were estimated using a receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve in relation to the echocardiographic LVH which was defined as LVM index ≥49 g/m2.7. RESULTS: The correlations of the Cornell voltage and product criteria (r=0.24 and 0.26 respectively, both P<0.0001) were stronger than that of the Sokolow-Lyon criteria (r=0.049 and 0.095, and P=0.26 and 0.03 respectively) with the LVM index. Similarly the performances of the Cornell voltage and product criteria for the echocardiographic LVH [area under curve (AUC): 0.66 and 0.68, both P<0.0001] were superior to that of the Sokolow-Lyon criteria (AUC: 0.54 and 0.53, both P>0.1) in the area under the ROC curve analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The Cornell ECG criteria for the echocardiographic LVH had better performance than the Sokolow-Lyon criteria in a young military male cohort in Taiwan.
BACKGROUND: The Cornell and Sokolow-Lyon electrocardiography (ECG) criteria have been widely used for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in patients with hypertension. However, the correlations of these ECG criteria with LVH were rarely compared in military members who received rigorous training, particularly of the Asian male population. METHODS: We compared the Cornell voltage and product criteria with the Sokolow-Lyon criteria for the echocardiographic LVH in 539 military male members, ages 18-50 years and free of hypertension in the Cardiorespiratory fitness and HospItalization Events in armed Forces (CHIEF) study in Taiwan. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to determine the association of each ECG criterion with the index of left ventricular mass (LVM, g)/height (m)2.7. The sensitivities and specificities were estimated using a receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve in relation to the echocardiographic LVH which was defined as LVM index ≥49 g/m2.7. RESULTS: The correlations of the Cornell voltage and product criteria (r=0.24 and 0.26 respectively, both P<0.0001) were stronger than that of the Sokolow-Lyon criteria (r=0.049 and 0.095, and P=0.26 and 0.03 respectively) with the LVM index. Similarly the performances of the Cornell voltage and product criteria for the echocardiographic LVH [area under curve (AUC): 0.66 and 0.68, both P<0.0001] were superior to that of the Sokolow-Lyon criteria (AUC: 0.54 and 0.53, both P>0.1) in the area under the ROC curve analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The Cornell ECG criteria for the echocardiographic LVH had better performance than the Sokolow-Lyon criteria in a young military male cohort in Taiwan.
Authors: Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack S Shanewise; Scott D Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William J Stewart Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Miranda E G Armstrong; Jane Green; Gillian K Reeves; Valerie Beral; Benjamin J Cairns Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-02-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Quynh A Truong; Leon M Ptaszek; Elizabeth M Charipar; Carolyn Taylor; Joao D Fontes; Matthias Kriegel; Thomas Irlbeck; Michael Toepker; Christopher L Schlett; Fabian Bamberg; Ron Blankstein; Thomas J Brady; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Peter M Okin; Richard B Devereux; Sverker Jern; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stevo Julius; Markku S Nieminen; Steven Snapinn; Katherine E Harris; Peter Aurup; Jonathan M Edelman; Bjorn Dahlof Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-07-28 Impact factor: 29.690