Literature DB >> 15226274

New gender-specific partition values for ECG criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy: recalibration against cardiac MRI.

Khaled Alfakih1, Kevin Walters, Tim Jones, John Ridgway, Alistair S Hall, Mohan Sivananthan.   

Abstract

ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) were mostly validated using left ventricular mass (LVM) as measured by M-mode echocardiography. LVM as measured by cardiac MRI has been demonstrated to be much more accurate and reproducible. We reevaluated the sensitivity and specificity of 4 ECG criteria of LVH against LVM as measured by cardiac MRI. Patients with systemic hypertension (n=288) and 60 normal volunteers had their LVM measured using a 1.5-Tesla MRI system. A 12-lead ECG was recorded, and 4 ECG criteria were evaluated: Sokolow-Lyon voltage, Cornell voltage, Cornell product, and Sokolow-Lyon product. Based on a cardiac MRI normal range, 39.9% of the hypertensive males and 36.7% of the hypertensive females had elevated LVM index. At a specificity of 95%, the Sokolow-Lyon product criterion had the highest sensitivity in females (26.2%), the Cornell criterion had the highest sensitivity in males (26.2%), and the Cornell product criteria had a relatively high sensitivity in both males and females (25.0% and 23.8%). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed the Cornell and Cornell product criteria to be superior for males whereas the Sokolow-Lyon product criterion was superior for females. Comparing the mean LVM index values of the subjects who were ECG LVH positive to the normal volunteers indicated that the ECG LVH criteria detect individuals with an LVM index substantially above the normal range. We have redefined the partition values for 4 different ECG LVH criteria, according to gender, and found that they detect subjects with markedly elevated LVM index.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15226274     DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000135249.66192.30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  29 in total

1.  A comparison of Cornell and Sokolow-Lyon electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy in a military male population in Taiwan: the Cardiorespiratory fitness and HospItalization Events in armed Forces study.

Authors:  Fang-Ying Su; Yi-Hwei Li; Yen-Po Lin; Chung-Jen Lee; Chih-Hung Wang; Fan-Chun Meng; Yun-Shun Yu; Felicia Lin; Hsien-Tsai Wu; Gen-Min Lin
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06

2.  Diagnostic and prognostic utility of electrocardiography for left ventricular hypertrophy defined by magnetic resonance imaging in relationship to ethnicity: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  Aditya Jain; Harikrishna Tandri; Darshan Dalal; Harjit Chahal; Elsayed Z Soliman; Ronald J Prineas; Aaron R Folsom; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 3.  End organ damage in hypertension.

Authors:  Roland E Schmieder
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 4.  Imaging in hypertensive heart disease.

Authors:  Rajesh Janardhanan; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2011-02

5.  Performance of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy as compared with cardiac computed tomography: from the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer Assisted Tomography trial.

Authors:  Quynh A Truong; Leon M Ptaszek; Elizabeth M Charipar; Carolyn Taylor; Joao D Fontes; Matthias Kriegel; Thomas Irlbeck; Michael Toepker; Christopher L Schlett; Fabian Bamberg; Ron Blankstein; Thomas J Brady; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Gender differences in the diagnosis and treatment of left ventricular hypertrophy detected by different electrocardiographic criteria. Findings from the SARA study.

Authors:  Vivencio Barrios; Carlos Escobar; Alberto Calderón; Sara Barrios; Josefa Navarro-Cid; Elena Ferrer; Rocio Echarri
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  QT peak prolongation is not associated with left ventricular hypertrophy in teenage professional football players.

Authors:  Samir Alchaghouri; Kenneth Y K Wong; Raphael A Perry; David R Ramsdale; John D Somauroo; Jason R Pyatt
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  Electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy in children.

Authors:  Peter R Rijnbeek; Gerard van Herpen; Livia Kapusta; A Derk Jan Ten Harkel; Maarten Witsenburg; Jan A Kors
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 1.655

9.  Electrocardiography and outcome in patients with diabetes mellitus on maintenance hemodialysis.

Authors:  Vera Krane; Fritz Heinrich; Malte Meesmann; Manfred Olschewski; Jürgen Lilienthal; Christiane Angermann; Stefan Störk; Johann Bauersachs; Christoph Wanner; Stefan Frantz
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  Left ventricular hypertrophy may be transient in the emergency department.

Authors:  Jan M Shoenberger; Serineh Voskanian; Sara Johnson; Terence Ahern; Sean O Henderson
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.