| Literature DB >> 28567032 |
Marie-Lou Gaucher1,2,3, Gabriel G Perron4, Julie Arsenault2, Ann Letellier1, Martine Boulianne3, Sylvain Quessy1.
Abstract
Extensive use of antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) in food animals has been questioned due to the globally increasing problem of antibiotic resistance. For the poultry industry, digestive health management following AGP withdrawal in Europe has been a challenge, especially the control of necrotic enteritis. Much research work has focused on gut health in commercial broiler chicken husbandry. Understanding the behavior of Clostridium perfringens in its ecological niche, the poultry barn, is key to a sustainable and cost-effective production in the absence of AGPs. Using polymerase chain reaction and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, we evaluated how the C. perfringens population evolved in drug-free commercial broiler chicken farms, either healthy or affected with recurring clinical necrotic enteritis outbreaks, over a 14-month period. We show that a high genotypic richness was associated with an increased risk of clinical necrotic enteritis. Also, necrotic enteritis-affected farms had a significant reduction of C. perfringens genotypic richness over time, an increase in the proportion of C. perfringens strains harboring the cpb2 gene, the netB gene, or both. Thus, necrotic enteritis occurrence is correlated with the presence of an initial highly diverse C. perfringens population, increasing the opportunity for the selective sweep of particularly virulent genotypes. Disease outbreaks also appear to largely influence the evolution of this bacterial species in poultry farms over time.Entities:
Keywords: Clostridium perfringens; commercial broiler chickens; drug-free program; necrotic enteritis; richness
Year: 2017 PMID: 28567032 PMCID: PMC5434140 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00881
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Estimates (standard deviation) of performance parameters of all drug-free flocks, which served as a basis for selecting production periods included in the current study.
| Performance parameters | Diseased ( | Healthy ( |
|---|---|---|
| Livability (%) | 97.25 (1.96) | 98.56 (1.76) |
| Condemnations (%) | 3.31 (2.58) | 2.52 (1.19) |
| Mean live weight at slaughter (kg) | 2.33 (0.15) | 2.45 (0.22) |
| Mean daily weight gain (g/d) | 61.90 (3.27) | 60.86 (1.55) |
| Kg per square meter (kg) | 25.46 (1.93) | 27.88 (2.11) |
| Clinical necrotic enteritis (% of affected flocks) | 100 | 0 |
Description protectof C. perfringens positive flocks according to the number of C. perfringens isolates recovered and toxin gene carriage, per farm health status and sampling time points of the study.
| Characteristics | Number of flocks | Number of isolates | % positive flocks/strains for each toxin gene | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | 4 | 18 | 100/100 | 0/0 | 75/78 | 0/0 | 50/67 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Final | 5 | 30 | 100/100 | 0/0 | 80/90 | 0/0 | 60/87 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Initial | 4 | 45 | 100/100 | 0/0 | 50/31 | 0/0 | 75/20 | 25/22 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| Final | 3 | 41 | 100/100 | 0/0 | 100/100 | 33/2 | 100/100 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 |
Description of the number of isolates, genotypes identified and toxin gene carriage per flock according to farm health status and production period.
| Farm id | Nb isolates | Genotypes identified | Positive isolates per flock | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≥2 toxin genes | ≥3 toxin genes | |||||||||
| Nb | % | Nb | % | Nb | % | Nb | % | |||
| Initial time point | ||||||||||
| Farm 3 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 100 | 2 | 100 | 2 | 100 | 2 | 100 |
| Farm 3 | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| Farm 5 | 3 | 11–42 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 67 | 2 | 67 | 0 | 0 |
| Farm 5 | 3 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Farm 8 | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| Farm 8 | 10 | 10–18–17 | 10 | 100 | 10 | 100 | 10 | 100 | 10 | 100 |
| Final time point | ||||||||||
| Farm 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Farm 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| Farm 5 | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| Farm 5 | 10 | 2–7–8 | 10 | 100 | 10 | 100 | 10 | 100 | 10 | 100 |
| Farm 8 | 7 | 3–34 | 7 | 100 | 7 | 100 | 7 | 100 | 7 | 100 |
| Farm 8 | 9 | 34–35 | 9 | 100 | 9 | 100 | 9 | 100 | 9 | 100 |
| Initial time point | ||||||||||
| Farm 4 | 15 | 20–21–25–38–39–40 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Farm 4 | 14 | 27–32–33–36–37–43 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 79 | 0 | 0 |
| Farm 7 | 15 | 13–14–15–16–22–26 | 7 | 47 | 13 | 87 | 13 | 87 | 7 | 47 |
| Farm 7 | 1 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| Final time point | ||||||||||
| Farm 4 | 14 | 12–19–31 | 14 | 100 | 14 | 100 | 14 | 100 | 14 | 100 |
| Farm 4 | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – | 0 | – |
| Farm 7 | 20 | 4–5–6–28–29 | 20 | 100 | 20 | 100 | 20 | 100 | 20 | 100 |
| Farm 7 | 7 | 23–24 | 7 | 7 | 100 | 7 | 100 | 7 | 100 | |