| Literature DB >> 28566693 |
Bin Rao1, Ruiying Zhang1, Lei Li1, Jin-Yu Shao1, Lihong V Wang2.
Abstract
Non-invasive optical imaging of neuronal voltage response signals in live brains is constrained in depth by the optical diffusion limit, which is due primarily to optical scattering by brain tissues. Although photoacoustic tomography breaks this limit by exciting the targets with diffused photons and detecting the resulting acoustic responses, it has not been demonstrated as a modality for imaging voltage responses. In this communication, we report the first demonstration of photoacoustic voltage response imaging in both in vitro HEK-293 cell cultures and in vivo mouse brain surfaces. Using spectroscopic photoacoustic tomography at isosbestic wavelengths, we can separate voltage response signals and hemodynamic signals on live brain surfaces. By imaging HEK-293 cell clusters through 4.5 mm thick ex vivo rat brain tissue, we demonstrate photoacoustic tomography of cell membrane voltage responses beyond the optical diffusion limit. Although the current voltage dye does not immediately allow in vivo deep brain voltage response imaging, we believe our method opens up a feasible technical path for deep brain studies in the future.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28566693 PMCID: PMC5451395 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02458-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Photoacoustic maximum-amplitude projection images of HEK-293 cells demonstrate photoacoustic signal changes due to cell membrane voltage changes. (b) Fractional photoacoustic signal change versus cell membrane resting voltage changes.
Figure 2In vivo mouse brain response before and during electrical stimulation at a minimally vascularized point. (a) The exact M-mode imaging location is identified by the yellow cross in the depth-coded maximum amplitude projection image of the DPA-stained mouse cranial window. (b) A 63 second stimulation sequence comprises 189 electrical stimulation pulses with a pulse width of 300 μs and a pulse period of 333 ms. (c) Baseline (before electrical stimulation) and response (during stimulation) of voltage and hemodynamic signals in the frequency domain. Both the voltage response signal (red) and hemodynamic response signal (black) have observable frequency components at 3.1 Hz and 6.2 Hz. The SNRs of the voltage and hemodynamic response peaks are respectively labeled with red and black text.
Figure 3In vivo mouse brain response before and during 4-Aminopyridine (4-AP) induced epilepsy. (a) The white cross identifies the M-mode recording point on the depth-encoded maximum amplitude projection image of the mouse brain through the cranial window. The color represents depth. (b) Fractional voltage and fractional hemodynamic signal changes in the time domain for the baseline (before 4-AP stimulation) and response (during 4-AP induced epilepsy). The SNRs of the voltage and hemodynamic response peaks are labeled with red and black text. The fractional voltage response signal change shows stronger responses (spike amplitudes) than the fractional hemodynamic signal change.
Figure 4Imaging HEK-293 cell clusters with different resting potentials through different thicknesses of ex vivo brain tissue. (a) HEK-293 cell cluster PACT images through 4.5 mm and 5.0 mm thick brain tissue. (b) The contrast-to-noise ratios of the HEK-293 cell cluster images acquired through 0.0 mm, 2.0 mm, 3.0 mm, 4.5 mm, and 5.0 mm thick brain tissue decrease as the brain tissue thickness increases. (c) Photoacoustic images of HEK-293 cell clusters acquired through 4.5 mm thick brain tissue in response to cell membrane voltage changes. (d) Fractional photoacoustic signal change versus cell membrane voltage change.