Literature DB >> 28565981

Complications associated with the use of flow-diverting devices for cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Geng Zhou1, Ming Su2, Yan-Ling Yin3, Ming-Hua Li1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to review the literature on the use of flow-diverting devices (FDDs) to treat intracranial aneurysms (IAs) and to investigate the safety and complications related to FDD treatment for IAs by performing a meta-analysis of published studies. METHODS A systematic electronic database search was conducted using the Springer, EBSCO, PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases on all accessible articles published up to January 2016, with no restriction on the publication year. Abstracts, full-text manuscripts, and the reference lists of retrieved articles were analyzed. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the complication rates across studies. RESULTS Sixty studies were included, which involved retrospectively collected data on 3125 patients. The use of FDDs was associated with an overall complication rate of 17.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.6%-20.5%) and a low mortality rate of 2.8% (95% CI 1.2%-4.4%). The neurological morbidity rate was 4.5% (95% CI 3.2%-5.8%). No significant difference in the complication or mortality rate was observed between 2 commonly used devices (the Pipeline embolization device and the Silk flow-diverter device). A significantly higher overall complication rate was found in the case of ruptured IAs than in unruptured IA (odds ratio 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.3). CONCLUSIONS The use of FDDs in the treatment of IAs yielded satisfactory results with regard to complications and the mortality rate. The risk of complications should be considered when deciding on treatment with FDDs. Further studies on the mechanism underlying the occurrence of adverse events are required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BA = basilar artery; CI = confidence interval; FDD = flow-diverting device; IA = intracranial aneurysm; ISS = in-stent stenosis; MCA = middle cerebral artery; OR = odds ratio; PED = Pipeline embolization device; SAC = stent-assisted coiling; SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage; complication; delayed rupture; flow-diverting device; intracranial aneurysm

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28565981     DOI: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS16450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  32 in total

1.  Comparison of Pipeline Embolization Device Sizing Based on Conventional 2D Measurements and Virtual Simulation Using the Sim&Size Software: An Agreement Study.

Authors:  J M Ospel; G Gascou; V Costalat; L Piergallini; K A Blackham; D W Zumofen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Mechanical Thrombectomy of Acutely Occluded Flow Diverters.

Authors:  Edgar A Samaniego; Sudeepta Dandapat; Jorge A Roa; Mario Zanaty; Daichi Nakagawa; David M Hasan
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.703

3.  Microneurosurgery for Paraclinoid Aneurysms in the Context of Flow Diverters.

Authors:  Sabino Luzzi; Mattia Del Maestro; Renato Galzio
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2021

4.  Downstream vascular changes after flow-diverting device deployment in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Praveen Kolumam Parameswaran; Daying Dai; Yong-Hong Ding; Matthew W Urban; Logan Manlove; Venkatachalem Sathish; Juan R Cebral; David F Kallmes; Ramanathan Kadirvel
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 5.836

5.  Analysis of Flow Dynamics and Outcomes of Cerebral Aneurysms Treated with Intrasaccular Flow-Diverting Devices.

Authors:  J R Cebral; B J Chung; F Mut; J Chudyk; C Bleise; E Scrivano; P Lylyk; R Kadirvel; D Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Pipeline Flex embolisation device with Shield Technology for the treatment of patients with intracranial aneurysms: periprocedural and 6 month outcomes.

Authors:  James Yeomans; Lilian Sandu; Anand Sastry
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2020-10-22

7.  Reduced Activity of von Willebrand Factor after Flow-Diverting Stent Implantation for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Link to Acquired von Willebrand Disease?

Authors:  I Oran; C Cinar; H Bozkaya; M Parildar; S Duman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  [Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters].

Authors:  A Simgen
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Longitudinal Monitoring of Flow-Diverting Stent Tissue Coverage After Implant in a Bifurcation Model Using Neurovascular High-Frequency Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Jildaz Caroff; Robert M King; Giovanni J Ughi; Miklos Marosfoi; Erin T Langan; Christopher Raskett; Ajit S Puri; Matthew J Gounis
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 10.  Mechanism of Action and Biology of Flow Diverters in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms.

Authors:  Krishnan Ravindran; Amanda M Casabella; Juan Cebral; Waleed Brinjikji; David F Kallmes; Ram Kadirvel
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.