Literature DB >> 28565789

Abdominal ultrasonography for patients with abdominal pain as a first-line diagnostic imaging modality.

Minoru Tomizawa1, Fuminobu Shinozaki2, Rumiko Hasegawa3, Yoshinori Shirai3, Yasufumi Motoyoshi4, Takao Sugiyama5, Shigenori Yamamoto6, Naoki Ishige7.   

Abstract

The utility and limitations of abdominal ultrasonography (US) were retrospectively evaluated as a first-line diagnostic imaging modality in patients with abdominal pain. Hospital records from patients subjected to abdominal US as a first-line diagnostic imaging examination at the National Hospital Organization Shimoshizu Hospital (Yotsukaido, Japan) from April 2010 to April 2015 were analyzed. Only those patients who underwent abdominal US to diagnose abdominal symptoms were included in the present study. All patients with prior diagnostic imaging examination findings were excluded from the study in order to reduce bias of results. The analyzed patients included 39 males with an average (mean ± standard deviation) age of 65.8±18.8 years and 37 females with an average age of 53.7±19.3 years. Diagnosis with abdominal US was in agreement with the final diagnosis in 66 of the 76 patients. Final diagnosis of symptoms by abdominal US was not successful in the remaining 10 patients who required further investigation. Acute cholangitis, acute cholecystitis, acute pancreatitis, acute appendicitis, colonic diverticulitis and spleen rupture were correctly diagnosed. Different types of cancer, including colorectal cancer, were also successfully diagnosed. Bile duct cancer and sigmoid colon volvulus could not be diagnosed by abdominal US due to the presence of intestinal gas. Abnormal findings were detected using abdominal US, but the diagnosis required additional consultation with gynecologists. Abdominal US was suitable for patients with abdominal symptoms. It is recommended that patients undergo further diagnostic imaging or consultation with gynecologists when large gas bubbles are present or gynecological conditions are suspected.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute appendicitis; colonic diverticulitis; ovarian torsion

Year:  2017        PMID: 28565789      PMCID: PMC5443284          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.4209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  31 in total

1.  Gastro-duodenal perforations: conventional plain film, US and CT findings in 166 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Roberto Grassi; Stefania Romano; Antonio Pinto; Luigia Romano
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 2.  Focus on abnormal air: diagnostic ultrasonography for the acute abdomen.

Authors:  Beatrice Hoffmann; Dieter Nürnberg; Mary C Westergaard
Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.799

Review 3.  Emergency radiology.

Authors:  Roberto Farina; Orlando Catalano; Ciro Stavolo; Fabio Sandomenico; Antonella Petrillo; Luigia Romano
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Sonographic appearance of adnexal torsion, correlation with other imaging modalities, and clinical history.

Authors:  Eugenio O Gerscovich; Michael T Corwin; Simran Sekhon; Gabriel J Runner; Regina F Gandour-Edwards
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.657

5.  Impact of accreditation training for residents on sonographic quality in gynecologic emergencies.

Authors:  Thomas Popowski; Cyrille Huchon; Khadija Fathallah; Bruno Falissard; Alexandre Dumont; Arnaud Fauconnier
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Appendix not seen: the predictive value of secondary inflammatory sonographic signs.

Authors:  Andrea Estey; Naveen Poonai; Rodrick Lim
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.454

7.  Determining the site and causes of colonic obstruction with sonography.

Authors:  J H Lim; Y T Ko; D H Lee; H W Lee; J W Lim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Transabdominal ultrasound for bowel evaluation.

Authors:  Peter M Rodgers; Ratan Verma
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  New diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholangitis in revised Tokyo Guidelines.

Authors:  Seiki Kiriyama; Tadahiro Takada; Steven M Strasberg; Joseph S Solomkin; Toshihiko Mayumi; Henry A Pitt; Dirk J Gouma; O James Garden; Markus W Büchler; Masamichi Yokoe; Yasutoshi Kimura; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Takao Itoi; Masahiro Yoshida; Fumihiko Miura; Yuichi Yamashita; Kohji Okamoto; Toshifumi Gabata; Jiro Hata; Ryota Higuchi; John A Windsor; Philippus C Bornman; Sheung-Tat Fan; Harijt Singh; Eduardo de Santibanes; Harumi Gomi; Shinya Kusachi; Atsuhiko Murata; Xiao-Ping Chen; Palepu Jagannath; Sunggyu Lee; Robert Padbury; Miin-Fu Chen
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 7.027

Review 10.  The abdominal radiograph.

Authors:  Barry James; Barry Kelly
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2013-09
View more
  3 in total

1.  Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Symptomatic Cholecystic Disease in Children: Defining Surgical Timing.

Authors:  Gloria Pelizzo; Rossana Bussani; Annalisa De Silvestri; Marco Di Mitri; Gregorio Rosone; Salvatore Amoroso; Mario Milazzo; Vincenza Girgenti; Giovanni Battista Mura; Elettra Unti; Davide Rozze; Vennus Shafiei; Valeria Calcaterra
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 3.418

2.  Adult omental alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma: An unusual site. A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Anwar Chammout; Mohamad Sami Alshutaihi; Ahmad Beshr Kelarji; Mouiad Naser; Asaad Mouselli; Rama Alyousfi
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-08-18

3.  Non-invasive evaluation of the equine gastrointestinal mucosal transcriptome.

Authors:  Michelle C Coleman; Canaan Whitfield-Cargile; Noah D Cohen; Jennifer L Goldsby; Laurie Davidson; Ana M Chamoun-Emanuelli; Ivan Ivanov; Susan Eades; Nancy Ing; Robert S Chapkin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.