Thomas Popowski1, Cyrille Huchon1, Khadija Fathallah1, Bruno Falissard1, Alexandre Dumont1, Arnaud Fauconnier2. 1. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Medicine, Intercommunal Hospital Center of Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France (T.P., C.H., K.F., A.F.); University Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.P., C.H., K.F., A.F.); Research Unit EA 7285, Risk and Safety in Clinical Medicine for Women and Perinatal Health, University Versailles Saint-Quentin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France (T.P., C.H., A.D., A.F.); Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 669, University Paris-Sud and University Paris-Descartes, Paris, France (B.F.); and Unité Mixte de Recherche 216, Institut de Recherche Pour le Développement Paris Descartes, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France (A.D.). 2. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Medicine, Intercommunal Hospital Center of Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Poissy, France (T.P., C.H., K.F., A.F.); University Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France (T.P., C.H., K.F., A.F.); Research Unit EA 7285, Risk and Safety in Clinical Medicine for Women and Perinatal Health, University Versailles Saint-Quentin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France (T.P., C.H., A.D., A.F.); Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 669, University Paris-Sud and University Paris-Descartes, Paris, France (B.F.); and Unité Mixte de Recherche 216, Institut de Recherche Pour le Développement Paris Descartes, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France (A.D.) afauconnier@chi-poissy-st-germain.fr.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of an educational intervention based on an original accreditation training program on the quality of emergency sonography performed by obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn) residents. METHODS: We conducted a prospective before-after study on residents who performed bedside standardized sonographic examinations as first-line investigations in patients seen at our gynecologic emergency department. In both periods, the residents followed a 1-hour class taught by a board-certified Ob/Gyn sonography expert (opinion leader) and received a written standardized imaging protocol. An accreditation training process was implemented for the new residents at the beginning of the second period: 5 complete sonographic examinations were required for each resident, and facilitated feedback from the opinion leader was performed using a dedicated sonographic quality score. During both periods, all consecutive sonograms were collected and stored. The primary outcome was the sonographic quality score. A mixed model for repeated measures was used to compare scores in both periods from 20 consecutive sonographic examinations performed by 5 residents who were different in each period. RESULTS: The mixed model analysis showed an increase in quality scores in the post-accreditation training compared to the pre-accreditation training period (estimated coefficient ± SD, 4.13 ± 0.51; t = 8.16). The sonographic examination order also had a significant effect in both periods (estimated coefficient ± SD, 0.11 ± 0.03; t = 3.99). CONCLUSIONS: An accreditation training process including facilitated feedback from a local opinion leader improved the quality of sonographic examinations performed by Ob/Gyn residents in women presenting to a gynecologic emergency department.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of an educational intervention based on an original accreditation training program on the quality of emergency sonography performed by obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn) residents. METHODS: We conducted a prospective before-after study on residents who performed bedside standardized sonographic examinations as first-line investigations in patients seen at our gynecologic emergency department. In both periods, the residents followed a 1-hour class taught by a board-certified Ob/Gyn sonography expert (opinion leader) and received a written standardized imaging protocol. An accreditation training process was implemented for the new residents at the beginning of the second period: 5 complete sonographic examinations were required for each resident, and facilitated feedback from the opinion leader was performed using a dedicated sonographic quality score. During both periods, all consecutive sonograms were collected and stored. The primary outcome was the sonographic quality score. A mixed model for repeated measures was used to compare scores in both periods from 20 consecutive sonographic examinations performed by 5 residents who were different in each period. RESULTS: The mixed model analysis showed an increase in quality scores in the post-accreditation training compared to the pre-accreditation training period (estimated coefficient ± SD, 4.13 ± 0.51; t = 8.16). The sonographic examination order also had a significant effect in both periods (estimated coefficient ± SD, 0.11 ± 0.03; t = 3.99). CONCLUSIONS: An accreditation training process including facilitated feedback from a local opinion leader improved the quality of sonographic examinations performed by Ob/Gyn residents in women presenting to a gynecologic emergency department.