Literature DB >> 28565607

WAITING FOR SPECIATION: THE EFFECT OF POPULATION SUBDIVISION ON THE TIME TO SPECIATION.

H Allen Orr1, Lynne H Orr2.   

Abstract

We study the time required for speciation in a species that is divided into small versus large populations. Following Dobzhansky and Muller, we assume that hybrid sterility or inviability is caused by "complementary genes," that is, by the accumulation of genes that cause sterility or inviability when brought together in hybrids but that have no deleterious effect on their normal species genetic background. When divergence between populations is caused by genetic drift, we show that the time to speciation is independent of population subdivision: speciation occurs just as quickly in a species split into a few large populations as into many small populations. When divergence is driven by natural selection, however, the time to speciation is very sensitive to population subdivision and speciation occurs most rapidly when a species is split into two large populations. These results contradict several popular intuitions about the effect of population size on speciation. © 1996 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Keywords:  Hybrid inviability; hybrid sterility; population subdivision; reproductive isolation; speciation

Year:  1996        PMID: 28565607     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03561.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  9 in total

1.  On the dependence of speciation rates on species abundance and characteristic population size.

Authors:  Anastassia M Makarieva; Victor G Gorshkov
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 2.  Multi-locus interactions and the build-up of reproductive isolation.

Authors:  I Satokangas; S H Martin; H Helanterä; J Saramäki; J Kulmuni
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  On the Coyne and Orr-igin of species: effects of intrinsic postzygotic isolation, ecological differentiation, x chromosome size, and sympatry on Drosophila speciation.

Authors:  Michael Turelli; Jeremy R Lipkowitz; Yaniv Brandvain
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Recombination does not generate pinworm susceptibility during experimental crosses between two mouse subspecies.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Derothe; Adeline Porcherie; Marco Perriat-Sanguinet; Claude Loubès; Catherine Moulia
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Simple Biophysical Model Predicts Faster Accumulation of Hybrid Incompatibilities in Small Populations Under Stabilizing Selection.

Authors:  Bhavin S Khatri; Richard A Goldstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Parapatric speciation in three islands: dynamics of geographical configuration of allele sharing.

Authors:  Ryo Yamaguchi; Yoh Iwasa
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Are developmental shifts the main driver of phenotypic evolution in Diplodus spp. (Perciformes: Sparidae)?

Authors:  Paolo Colangelo; Daniele Ventura; Paolo Piras; Jacopo Pagani Guazzugli Bonaiuti; Giandomenico Ardizzone
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Rapid evolution of post-zygotic reproductive isolation is widespread in Arctic plant lineages.

Authors:  A Lovisa S Gustafsson; Galina Gussarova; Liv Borgen; Hajime Ikeda; Alexandre Antonelli; Lucas Marie-Orleach; Loren H Rieseberg; Christian Brochmann
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Proteotoxicity caused by perturbed protein complexes underlies hybrid incompatibility in yeast.

Authors:  Krishna B S Swamy; Hsin-Yi Lee; Carmina Ladra; Chien-Fu Jeff Liu; Jung-Chi Chao; Yi-Yun Chen; Jun-Yi Leu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 17.694

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.