Literature DB >> 15197582

Recombination does not generate pinworm susceptibility during experimental crosses between two mouse subspecies.

Jean-Marc Derothe1, Adeline Porcherie, Marco Perriat-Sanguinet, Claude Loubès, Catherine Moulia.   

Abstract

The susceptibility to Aspiculuris tetraptera of European Mus musculus hybrids is thought to reflect the disruption of genomic co-adaptation through recombination of the parental genomes. Here, we compared the susceptibility to this parasite between parents and experimental hybrids (intersubspecific until F4, intrasubspecific F1, F2) to clarify the contributions of heterosis and subspecies incompatibility. F1 showed hybrid vigor. Unlike intrasubspecific F2, intersubspecific F2 were less resistant than F1, but revealed no increased susceptibility relative to the parents. Intersubspecific F3 and F4 showed the same hybrid vigor as F1. Heterosis contributed most to the resistance, but the differences between intra- and intersubspecific F2 suggested genomic incompatibilities between subspecies. However, the susceptibility did not increase through the recombination process, showing that disruption of co-adaptation does not directly affect resistance. Even if previous studies still support the selective role of parasites in the current hybrid zone, an alternative hypothesis on the origin of hybrid susceptibility is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15197582     DOI: 10.1007/s00436-004-1145-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasitol Res        ISSN: 0932-0113            Impact factor:   2.289


  27 in total

1.  Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation.

Authors:  M Turelli; H A Orr
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Genetics and the fitness of hybrids.

Authors:  J M Burke; M L Arnold
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 16.830

3.  Comparison between patterns of pinworm infection (Aspiculuris tetraptera) in wild and laboratory strains of mice, Mus musculus.

Authors:  J M Derothe; C Loubès; A Orth; F Renaud; C Moulia
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.981

4.  Hybridization of bird species.

Authors:  P R Grant; B R Grant
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-04-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Hybrid zones-natural laboratories for evolutionary studies.

Authors:  G M Hewitt
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 6.  Sex differences in parasite infections: patterns and processes.

Authors:  M Zuk; K A McKean
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.981

7.  Discordant phylogeographic patterns between the Y chromosome and mitochondrial DNA in the house mouse: selection on the Y chromosome?

Authors:  S Boissinot; P Boursot
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Pinworm infections in laboratory rodents: a review.

Authors:  L F Taffs
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.471

9.  Long-term population dynamics of pinworms (Syphacia obvelata and Aspiculuris tetraptera) in mice.

Authors:  M E Scott; H C Gibbs
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.276

10.  Wormy mice in a hybrid zone.

Authors:  R D Sage; D Heyneman; K C Lim; A C Wilson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Nov 6-12       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Shifting focus from resistance to disease tolerance: A review on hybrid house mice.

Authors:  Alice Balard; Emanuel Heitlinger
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Prevalence and intensity of avian malaria in a quail hybrid zone.

Authors:  Allison M Roth; Carl N Keiser; Judson B Williams; Jennifer M Gee
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 2.912

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.