Literature DB >> 28565596

SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM AS A CORRELATED RESPONSE TO SELECTION ON BODY SIZE: AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF THE QUANTITATIVE GENETIC MODEL.

Jeff P Reeve1, Daphne J Fairbairn1.   

Abstract

We artificially selected for body size in Drosophila melanogaster to test Lande's quantitative genetic model for the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Thorax width was used as an estimator of body size. Selection was maintained for 21 generations in both directions on males only, females only, or both sexes simultaneously. The correlated response of sexual size dimorphism in each selection regime was compared to the response predicted by four variants of the model, each of which differed only in assumptions about input parameters. Body size responded well to selection, but the correlated response of sexual size dimorphism was weaker than that predicted by any of the variants. Dimorphism decreased in most selection lines, contrary to the model predictions. We suggest that selection on body size acts primarily on growth trajectories. Changes in dimorphism are caused by the fact that male and female growth trajectories are not parallel and termination of growth at different points along the curves results in dimorphism levels that are difficult to predict without detailed knowledge of growth parameters. This may also explain many of the inconsistent results in dimorphism changes seen in earlier selection experiments. © 1996 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial selection; Drosophila melanogaster; body size; growth trajectories; sexual size dimorphism

Year:  1996        PMID: 28565596     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03580.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  15 in total

1.  Potential constraints on evolution: sexual dimorphism and the problem of protandry in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana.

Authors:  Bas J Zwaan; Wilte G Zijlstra; Marieke Keller; Jeroen Pijpe; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Sexual conflict and environmental change: trade-offs within and between the sexes during the evolution of desiccation resistance.

Authors:  Lucia Kwan; Stéphanie Bedhomme; N G Prasad; Adam K Chippindale
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Thermal phenotypic plasticity of body size in Drosophila melanogaster: sexual dimorphism and genetic correlations.

Authors:  Jean R David; Amir Yassin; Jean-Claude Moreteau; Helene Legout; Brigitte Moreteau
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Cross-sex genetic correlation does not extend to sexual size dimorphism in spiders.

Authors:  Eva Turk; Matjaž Kuntner; Simona Kralj-Fišer
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-12-05

5.  REML estimates of genetic parameters of sexual dimorphism for wing and thorax length in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Sandrine Mignon-Grasteau; Jean David; Patricia Gibert; Hélène Legout; Georges Pétavy; Brigitte Moreteau; Catherine Beaumont
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.166

6.  Genetic variation in baboon craniofacial sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Katherine E Willmore; Charles C Roseman; Jeffrey Rogers; Joan T Richtsmeier; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Genetic variability of sexual size dimorphism in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster: an isofemale-line approach.

Authors:  Jean R David; Patricia Gibert; Sandrine Mignon-Grasteau; Hélène Legout; Georges Pétavy; Catherine Beaumont; Brigitte Moreteau
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

8.  Divergent abdominal bristle patterns in two distantly related drosophilids: antero-posterior variations and sexual dimorphism in a modular trait.

Authors:  Luciana O Araripe; Amir Yassin; Louis Bernard Klaczko; Brigitte Moréteau; Jean R David
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 9.  What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us?

Authors:  N G Prasad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003 Apr-Aug       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 10.  Sex differences in phenotypic plasticity affect variation in sexual size dimorphism in insects: from physiology to evolution.

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell; Wolf U Blanckenhorn; Tiit Teder; Goggy Davidowitz; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 19.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.