Literature DB >> 15536255

REML estimates of genetic parameters of sexual dimorphism for wing and thorax length in Drosophila melanogaster.

Sandrine Mignon-Grasteau1, Jean David, Patricia Gibert, Hélène Legout, Georges Pétavy, Brigitte Moreteau, Catherine Beaumont.   

Abstract

Restricted maximum likelihood was used to estimate genetic parameters of male and female wing and thorax length in isofemale lines of Drosophila melanogaster, and results compared to estimates obtained earlier with the classical analysis of variance approach. As parents within an isofemale line were unknown, a total of 500 parental pedigrees were simulated and mean estimates computed. Full and half sibs were distinguished, in contrast to usual isofemale studies in which animals were all treated as half sibs and hence heritability was overestimated. Heritability was thus estimated at 0.33, 0.38, 0.30 and 0.33 for male and female wing length and male and female thorax length, respectively, whereas corresponding estimates obtained using analysis of variance were 0.46, 0.54, 0.35 and 0.38. Genetic correlations between male and female traits were 0.85 and 0.62 for wing and thorax length, respectively. Sexual dimorphism and the ratio of female to male traits were moderately heritable (0.30 and 0.23 for wing length, 0.38 and 0.23 for thorax length). Both were moderately and positively correlated with female traits, and weakly and negatively correlated with male traits. Such heritabilities confirmed that sexual dimorphism might be a fast evolving trait in Drosophila.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15536255     DOI: 10.1007/bf02729893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet        ISSN: 0022-1333            Impact factor:   1.166


  12 in total

1.  Genetic and phenotypic correlations among size-related traits, and heritability variation between body parts in Drosophila buzzatii.

Authors:  F M Norry; J C Vilardi; E Hasson
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Ecological aspects of the heritability of body size in Drosophila buzzatii.

Authors:  T Prout; J S Barker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM AS A CORRELATED RESPONSE TO SELECTION ON BODY SIZE: AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF THE QUANTITATIVE GENETIC MODEL.

Authors:  Jeff P Reeve; Daphne J Fairbairn
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Prediction of breeding values when variances are not known.

Authors:  D Gianola; J Foulley; R Fernando
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  The analysis of quantitative variation in natural populations with isofemale strains.

Authors:  A Hoffmann; P Parsons
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Quantitative genetics and fitness: lessons from Drosophila.

Authors:  D A Roff; T A Mousseau
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  The correlation between feed efficiency and rate of gain, a ratio and its denominator.

Authors:  T M Sutherland
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Quantitative Genetics of Drosophila Melanogaster. II. Heritabilities and Genetic Correlations between Sexes for Head and Thorax Traits.

Authors:  D E Cowley; W R Atchley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Quantitative Genetics of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. I. Sexual Dimorphism in Genetic Parameters for Wing Traits.

Authors:  D E Cowley; W R Atchley; J J Rutledge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Genetic variability of sexual size dimorphism in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster: an isofemale-line approach.

Authors:  Jean R David; Patricia Gibert; Sandrine Mignon-Grasteau; Hélène Legout; Georges Pétavy; Catherine Beaumont; Brigitte Moreteau
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

View more
  1 in total

1.  Experimental evidence for paternal effects on offspring growth rate in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus).

Authors:  Eirik Mack Eilertsen; Bård-Jørgen Bårdsen; Ståle Liljedal; Geir Rudolfsen; Ivar Folstad
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.