Literature DB >> 28565528

THE DISTRIBUTION OF PHENOTYPIC VARIANCE WITH INBREEDING.

Kevin Fowler1, Michael C Whitlock2.   

Abstract

Fifty-two inbred populations of Drosophila melanogaster, each founded from a single pair, and a large number of control, outbred flies were measured for fitness and a set of six traits. A survey of the literature on the effects of inbreeding and population bottlenecks demonstrates that the commonly observed pattern of an apparent variance among characters and among species in changes of phenotypic variance may in fact be largely the result of sampling error, given the pattern of change that we demonstrate within a species for the same character. In our study, population bottlenecks on average decrease the amount of phenotypic variance for a suite of wing characteristics and size, but there is large and significant variation among lines in the amount of phenotypic variance. As a result, several lines increased in variance in spite of the average decrease. Interestingly, the changes in phenotypic variance for fitness are in sharp contrast to those seen for phenotypic variance for morphological traits. The amount of phenotypic variance for fitness varies highly significantly among lines but, on average, is increased by bottlenecks. The changes in phenotypic variance as a result of population bottlenecks are large enough to significantly affect the probability of peak shifts by the variance-induced peak shift model. © 1999 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila melanogaster; Inbreeding; peak shifts; phenotypic variance; wing traits

Year:  1999        PMID: 28565528     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb04528.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  11 in total

Review 1.  Inbreeding and sex: canalization, plasticity and sexual selection.

Authors:  Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Extreme temperatures increase the deleterious consequences of inbreeding under laboratory and semi-natural conditions.

Authors:  Torsten N Kristensen; J Stuart F Barker; Kamilla S Pedersen; Volker Loeschcke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Slow inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster express as much inbreeding depression as fast inbred lines under semi-natural conditions.

Authors:  Torsten Nygaard Kristensen; Morten Ravn Knudsen; Volker Loeschcke
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Modeling between-subject and within-subject variances in ecological momentary assessment data using mixed-effects location scale models.

Authors:  Donald Hedeker; Robin J Mermelstein; Hakan Demirtas
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  A Bivariate Mixed-Effects Location-Scale Model with application to Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) data.

Authors:  Oksana Pugach; Donald Hedeker; Robin Mermelstein
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2014-12

6.  Selection signatures in melanocortin-1 receptor gene of turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) raised in hot humid tropics.

Authors:  S O Durosaro; B M Ilori; O S Iyasere; O G George; O A Adewumi; P A Ojo; T A Yusuff; M R Adetifa; T S Atanda; M O Ozoje
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 1.559

7.  Population genomics of wild and laboratory zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Authors:  Andrew R Whiteley; Anuradha Bhat; Emilia P Martins; Richard L Mayden; M Arunachalam; Silva Uusi-Heikkilä; A T A Ahmed; Jiwan Shrestha; Matthew Clark; Derek Stemple; Louis Bernatchez
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Evolution of mitotic spindle behavior during the first asymmetric embryonic division of nematodes.

Authors:  Aurore-Cécile Valfort; Caroline Launay; Marie Sémon; Marie Delattre
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  The effect of ancient population bottlenecks on human phenotypic variation.

Authors:  Andrea Manica; William Amos; François Balloux; Tsunehiko Hanihara
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Phenotypic covariance at species' borders.

Authors:  M Julian Caley; Edward Cripps; Edward T Game
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.