Literature DB >> 28565273

WITHIN- AND BETWEEN-GENERATION EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE ON THE MORPHOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Wayne D Crill1, Raymond B Huey1, George W Gilchrist1.   

Abstract

We investigated the effects of developmental and parental temperatures on several physiological and morphological traits of adult Drosophila melanogaster. Flies for the parental generation were raised at either low or moderate temperature (18°C or 25°C) and then mated in the four possible sex-by-parental temperature crosses. Their offspring were raised at either 18°C or 25°C and then scored as adults for morphological (dry body mass, wing size, and abdominal melanization [females only]), physiological (knock-down temperature, and thermal dependence of walking speed), and life history (egg size) traits. The experiment was replicated, and the factorial design allows us to determine whether and how paternal, maternal, and developmental temperatures (as well as offspring sex) influence the various traits. Sex and developmental temperature had major effects on all traits. Females had larger bodies and wings, higher knock-down temperatures, and slower speeds (but similar shaped performance curves) than males. Development at 25°C (versus at 18°C) increased knock-down temperature, increased maximal speed and thermal performance breadth, decreased the optimal temperature for walking, decreased body mass and wing size, reduced abdominal melanization, and reduced egg size. Parental temperatures influenced a few traits, but the effects were generally small relative to those of sex or developmental temperature. Flies whose mother had been raised at 25°C (versus at 18°C) had slightly higher knock-down temperature and smaller body mass. Flies whose father had been raised at 25°C had relatively longer wings. The effects of paternal, maternal, and developmental temperatures sometimes differed in direction. The existence of significant within- and between-generation effects suggests that comparative studies need to standardize thermal environments for at least two generations, that attempts to estimate "field" heritabilities may be unreliable for some traits, and that predictions of short-term evolutionary responses to selection will be difficult. © 1996 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acclimation; Drosophila melanogaster; body size; coloration; developmental effects; egg size; locomotion; maternal effects; paternal effects; temperature

Year:  1996        PMID: 28565273     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb02361.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  28 in total

1.  The impact of larval predators and competitors on the morphology and fitness of juvenile treefrogs.

Authors:  Rick A Relyea; Jason T Hoverman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-01-25       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Effects of paternal phenotype and environmental variability on age and size at maturity in a male dimorphic mite.

Authors:  Isabel M Smallegange
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-03-09

3.  Phenotypic plasticity may help lizards cope with increasingly variable temperatures.

Authors:  Liang Ma; Bao-Jun Sun; Peng Cao; Xing-Han Li; Wei-Guo Du
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The effects of temperature on host-pathogen interactions in D. melanogaster: who benefits?

Authors:  Jodell E Linder; Katharine A Owers; Daniel E L Promislow
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 2.354

5.  Shape and size variation on the wing of Drosophila mediopunctata: influence of chromosome inversions and genotype-environment interaction.

Authors:  Luciane Mendes Hatadani; Louis Bernard Klaczko
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-10-21       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  The devil in the details of life-history evolution: instability and reversal of genetic correlations during selection on Drosophila development.

Authors:  Adam K Chippindale; Anh L Ngo; Michael R Rose
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 7.  What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us?

Authors:  N G Prasad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003 Apr-Aug       Impact factor: 1.166

8.  The relative contributions of developmental plasticity and adult acclimation to physiological variation in the tsetse fly, Glossina pallidipes (Diptera, Glossinidae).

Authors:  John S Terblanche; Steven L Chown
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  The implications of nongenetic inheritance for evolution in changing environments.

Authors:  Russell Bonduriansky; Angela J Crean; Troy Day
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 5.183

Review 10.  Life-History Evolution and the Genetics of Fitness Components in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Thomas Flatt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.