Literature DB >> 28565011

THE EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE PHENOTYPE DISTRIBUTION IN A RANDOM ENVIRONMENT.

Akira Sasaki1, Stephen Ellner2.   

Abstract

In an unpredictably changing environment, phenotypic variability may evolve as a "bet-hedging" strategy. We examine here two models for evolutionarily stable phenotype distributions resulting from stabilizing selection with a randomly fluctuating optimum. Both models include overlapping generations, either survival of adults or a dormant propagule pool. In the first model (mixed-strategies model) we assume that individuals can produce offspring with a distribution of phenotypes, in which case, the evolutionarily stable population always consists of a single genotype. We show that there is a unique evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) distribution that does not depend on the amount of generational overlap, and that the ESS distribution generically is discrete rather than continuous; that is, there are distinct classes of offspring rather than a continuous distribution of offspring phenotypes. If the probability of extreme fluctuations in the optimum is sufficiently small, then the ESS distribution is monomorphic: a single type fitted to the mean environment. At higher levels of variability, the ESS distribution is polymorphic, and we find stability conditions for dimorphic distributions. For an exponential or similarly broad-tailed distribution of the optimum phenotype, the ESS consists of an infinite number of distinct phenotypes. In the second model we assume that an individual produces offspring with a single, genetically determined phenotype (pure-strategies model). The ESS population then contains multiple genotypes when the environmental variance is sufficiently high. However the phenotype distributions are similar to those in the mixed-strategies model: discrete, with an increasing number of distinct phenotypes as the environmental variance increases. © 1995 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bet-hedging; evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS); genetic polymorphism; phenotypic variation; random environment

Year:  1995        PMID: 28565011     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02246.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  11 in total

1.  Daniel Bernoulli (1738): evolution and economics under risk.

Authors:  S C Stearns
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Evolvability is a selectable trait.

Authors:  David J Earl; Michael W Deem
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Dormant propagule banks integrate spatio-temporal heterogeneity in cladoceran communities.

Authors:  Jochen Vandekerkhove; Steven Declerck; Erik Jeppesen; José Maria Conde-Porcuna; Luc Brendonck; Luc De Meester
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  On selection dynamics for competitive interactions.

Authors:  Pierre-Emmanuel Jabin; Gaël Raoul
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Oligomorphic dynamics for analyzing the quantitative genetics of adaptive speciation.

Authors:  Akira Sasaki; Ulf Dieckmann
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  On the impossibility of coexistence of infinitely many strategies.

Authors:  Mats Gyllenberg; Géza Meszéna
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2004-12-20       Impact factor: 2.259

7.  Environmental fluctuations and the maintenance of genetic diversity in age or stage-structured populations.

Authors:  S Ellner
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.758

8.  Evolution of species trait through resource competition.

Authors:  Sepideh Mirrahimi; Benoît Perthame; Joe Yuichiro Wakano
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 2.259

9.  Fundamental Dimensions of Environmental Risk : The Impact of Harsh versus Unpredictable Environments on the Evolution and Development of Life History Strategies.

Authors:  Bruce J Ellis; Aurelio José Figueredo; Barbara H Brumbach; Gabriel L Schlomer
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2009-06

10.  Direct competition results from strong competition for limited resource.

Authors:  Sepideh Mirrahimi; Benoît Perthame; Joe Yuichiro Wakano
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.259

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.