Literature DB >> 28564974

QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN HUMAN BODY SIZE.

Alan R Rogers1, Arindam Mukherjee2.   

Abstract

A classical data set is used to predict the effect of selection on sexual dimorphism and on the population means of three characters-stature, span, and cubit-in humans. Given selection of equal intensity, the population means of stature and of cubit should respond more than 60 times as fast as dimorphism in these characters. The population mean of span should also respond far more rapidly than dimorphism, but no numerical estimate of the ratio of these rates was possible. These results imply that sexual dimorphism in these characters can evolve only very slowly. Consequently, hypotheses about the causes of sexual dimorphism cannot be tested by comparing the dimorphism of different human societies. It has been suggested that primate sexual dimorphism may be an allometric response to selection for larger body size. We show that such selection can indeed generate sexual dimorphism, but that this effect is too weak to account for the observed relationship between dimorphism and body size in primates. © 1992 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthropometrics; genetic constraints; natural selection; sexual dimorphism; sexual selection

Year:  1992        PMID: 28564974     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb01997.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

1.  Monogamy with a purpose.

Authors:  Frans B M de Waal; Sergey Gavrilets
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sexual size dimorphism, canine dimorphism, and male-male competition in primates: where do humans fit in?

Authors:  J Michael Plavcan
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-03

3.  Substantial but Misunderstood Human Sexual Dimorphism Results Mainly From Sexual Selection on Males and Natural Selection on Females.

Authors:  William D Lassek; Steven J C Gaulin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-17

4.  Sexual selection and physical attractiveness : Implications for mating dynamics.

Authors:  S W Gangestad
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1993-09

5.  Genetic variation in baboon craniofacial sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Katherine E Willmore; Charles C Roseman; Jeffrey Rogers; Joan T Richtsmeier; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Evolution of female carotenoid coloration by sexual constraint in Carduelis finches.

Authors:  Gonçalo C Cardoso; Paulo Gama Mota
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Modest effects of dietary supplements during the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from 445 850 users of the COVID-19 Symptom Study app.

Authors:  Panayiotis Louca; Benjamin Murray; Kerstin Klaser; Tim D Spector; Cristina Menni; Mark S Graham; Mohsen Mazidi; Emily R Leeming; Ellen Thompson; Ruth Bowyer; David A Drew; Long H Nguyen; Jordi Merino; Maria Gomez; Olatz Mompeo; Ricardo Costeira; Carole H Sudre; Rachel Gibson; Claire J Steves; Jonathan Wolf; Paul W Franks; Sebastien Ourselin; Andrew T Chan; Sarah E Berry; Ana M Valdes; Philip C Calder
Journal:  BMJ Nutr Prev Health       Date:  2021-04-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.