Literature DB >> 28564867

EVOLUTION OF SPRINT SPEED IN LACERTID LIZARDS: MORPHOLOGICAL, PHYSIOLOGICAL, AND BEHAVIORAL COVARIATION.

Dirk Bauwens1, Theodore Garland2, Aurora M Castilla3, Raoul Van Damme3.   

Abstract

Organismal performance abilities occupy a central position in phenotypic evolution; they are determined by suites of interacting lower-level traits (e.g., morphology and physiology) and they are a primary focus of natural selection. The mechanisms by which higher levels of organismal performance are achieved during evolution are therefore fundamentally important for understanding correlated evolution in general and coadaptation in particular. Here we address correlated evolution of morphological, physiological, and behavioral characteristics that influence interspecific variation in sprint speed in a clade of lacertid lizards. Phylogenetic analyses using independent contrasts indicate that the evolution of high maximum sprinting abilities (measured on a photocell-timed racetrack) has occurred via the evolution of (1) longer hind limbs relative to body size, and (2) a higher physiologically optimum temperature for sprinting. For ectotherms, which experience variable body temperatures while active, sprinting abilities in nature depend on both maximum capacities and relative performance levels (i.e., percent of maximum) that can be attained. With respect to temperature effects, relative performance levels are determined by the interaction between thermal physiology and thermoregulatory behavior. Among the 13 species or subspecies of lizards in the present study, differences in the optimal temperature for sprinting (body temperature at which lizards run fastest) closely matched interspecific variation in median preferred body temperature (measured in a laboratory photothermal gradient), indicating correlated evolution of thermal physiology and thermal preferences. Variability of the preferred body temperatures maintained by each species is, across species, negatively correlated with the thermal-performance breadth (range of body temperatures over which lizards can run relatively fast). This pattern leads to interspecific differences in the levels of relative sprint speed that lizards are predicted to attain while active at their preferred temperatures. The highest levels of predicted relative performance are achieved by species that combine a narrow, precise distribution of preferred temperatures with the ability to sprint at near-maximum speeds over a wide range of body temperatures. The observed among-species differences in predicted relative speed were positively correlated with the interspecific variation in maximum sprinting capacities. Thus, species that attain the highest maximum speeds are (1) also able to run at near-maximum levels over a wide range of temperatures and (2) also maintain body temperatures within a narrow zone near the optimal temperature for sprinting. The observed pattern of correlated evolution therefore has involved traits at distinct levels of biological organization, that is, morphology, physiology, and behavior; and trade-offs are not evident. We hypothesize that this particular trait combination has evolved in response to coadaptational selection pressures. We also discuss our results in the context of possible evolutionary responses to global climatic change. © 1995 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Keywords:  Body size; coadaptation; comparative method; correlated evolution; lizards; locomotion; morphology; physiology; sprint speed; temperature

Year:  1995        PMID: 28564867     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02321.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  31 in total

1.  Is the whole more than the sum of its parts? Evolutionary trade-offs between burst and sustained locomotion in lacertid lizards.

Authors:  B Vanhooydonck; R S James; J Tallis; P Aerts; Z Tadic; K A Tolley; G J Measey; A Herrel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Thermal dependence of locomotor performance in two cool-temperate lizards.

Authors:  Mya J Gaby; Anne A Besson; Chalene N Bezzina; Amanda J Caldwell; Sarai Cosgrove; Alison Cree; Steff Haresnape; Kelly M Hare
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Genetic variation, predator-prey interactions and food web structure.

Authors:  Jordi Moya-Laraño
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Habitat use and vestibular system's dimensions in lacertid lizards.

Authors:  Menelia Vasilopoulou-Kampitsi; Jana Goyens; Simon Baeckens; Raoul Van Damme; Peter Aerts
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Tail autotomy affects bipedalism but not sprint performance in a cursorial Mediterranean lizard.

Authors:  Pantelis Savvides; Maria Stavrou; Panayiotis Pafilis; Spyros Sfenthourakis
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2016-12-21

Review 6.  Springs, steroids, and slingshots: the roles of enhancers and constraints in animal movement.

Authors:  Timothy E Higham; Duncan J Irschick
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 2.200

7.  Performance correlates of resting metabolic rate in garden skinks Lampropholis delicata.

Authors:  Lucy Merritt; Philip G D Matthews; Craig R White
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 2.200

8.  Evolution of a high-performance and functionally robust musculoskeletal system in salamanders.

Authors:  Stephen M Deban; Jeffrey A Scales; Segall V Bloom; Charlotte M Easterling; Mary Kate O'Donnell; Jeffrey P Olberding
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  An ecophysiological background for biogeographic patterns of two island lizards?

Authors:  Miguel A Carretero; Evandro P Lopes; Raquel Vasconcelos
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2016-11-26

10.  The effects of temperature and inter-individual variation on the locomotor performance of juvenile turtles.

Authors:  Michael A Elnitsky; Dennis L Claussen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 2.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.