Literature DB >> 23292335

Springs, steroids, and slingshots: the roles of enhancers and constraints in animal movement.

Timothy E Higham1, Duncan J Irschick.   

Abstract

Whole-body movement is an essential part of life for many animal species, and is used to evade predators, capture prey, and perform many other behaviors. In many cases, the ability to perform rapid movements may be crucial to fitness as doing so may allow animals to do things like effectively capture an elusive prey or to elude a chasing predator. A significant body of research has been devoted toward the musculoskeletal and neurobiological basis of animal movement, with large reviews and volumes written on locomotion and feeding. Biologists have also defined how movement can be quantified and compared among different species. Arnold (Am Zool 23:347-361, 1983) first clearly explained that the ability to perform an ecologically important task could be labeled and quantified as maximum performance abilities, a point that is elaborated upon later (Garland and Losos, Ecological morphology: integrative organismal biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1994; Irschick et al., Evol Ecol Res 10:177-196, 2008). Some commonly examined performance traits include maximum sprint speed, maximum acceleration or deceleration, maneuverability, maximum aerobic capacity (VO2max), bite force, and rapidity of tongue projection, among other examples. Although the ability to perform such movements can be limited by muscle physiology, there are several situations in which the limits of muscle physiology are circumvented with a range of specializations. Here, we synthesize the literature dealing with movement (primarily ballistic) enhancers. Our goal is both to encapsulate the current state of knowledge of enhancers, and also to provide a broader evolutionary framework that might explain in which ecological contexts they have evolved, and how they can be studied in the future. Some common mechanisms for enhancing movement include elastic energy storage (e.g., tendons and other materials) in vertebrates and invertebrates, or hormonal changes (e.g., increased testosterone levels).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23292335     DOI: 10.1007/s00360-012-0734-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol B        ISSN: 0174-1578            Impact factor:   2.200


  87 in total

1.  Biomechanics: froghopper insects leap to new heights.

Authors:  Malcolm Burrows
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-07-31       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Modularity and scaling in fast movements: power amplification in mantis shrimp.

Authors:  Thomas Claverie; Elliot Chan; Sheila N Patek
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Ballistic movements of jumping legs implemented as variable components of cricket behaviour.

Authors:  R Hustert; M Baldus
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Muscle directly meets the vast power demands in agile lizards.

Authors:  Nancy A Curtin; Roger C Woledge; Peter Aerts
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Muscular force in running turkeys: the economy of minimizing work.

Authors:  T J Roberts; R L Marsh; P G Weyand; C R Taylor
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-02-21       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Effect of testosterone on muscle mass and muscle protein synthesis.

Authors:  R C Griggs; W Kingston; R F Jozefowicz; B E Herr; G Forbes; D Halliday
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1989-01

7.  Effects of training and testosterone on muscle fiber types and locomotor performance in male six-lined racerunners (Aspidoscelis sexlineata).

Authors:  Jennifer L O'Connor; Lance D McBrayer; Timothy E Higham; Jerry F Husak; Ignacio T Moore; David C Rostal
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.247

8.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme.

Authors:  S J Gould; R C Lewontin
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-09-21

9.  Grip and limb force limits to turning performance in competition horses.

Authors:  Huiling Tan; Alan M Wilson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Evidence for an elastic projection mechanism in the chameleon tongue.

Authors:  Jurriaan H de Groot; Johan L van Leeuwen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  5 in total

1.  Adaptive simplification and the evolution of gecko locomotion: morphological and biomechanical consequences of losing adhesion.

Authors:  Timothy E Higham; Aleksandra V Birn-Jeffery; Clint E Collins; C Darrin Hulsey; Anthony P Russell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Physical trade-offs shape the evolution of buoyancy control in sharks.

Authors:  Adrian C Gleiss; Jean Potvin; Jeremy A Goldbogen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Epaxial muscle fiber architecture favors enhanced excursion and power in the leaper Galago senegalensis.

Authors:  Emranul Huq; Christine E Wall; Andrea B Taylor
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 4.  Shooting Mechanisms in Nature: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aimée Sakes; Marleen van der Wiel; Paul W J Henselmans; Johan L van Leeuwen; Dimitra Dodou; Paul Breedveld
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Machine learning accurately predicts the multivariate performance phenotype from morphology in lizards.

Authors:  Simon P Lailvaux; Avdesh Mishra; Pooja Pun; Md Wasi Ul Kabir; Robbie S Wilson; Anthony Herrel; Md Tamjidul Hoque
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.