Literature DB >> 28564216

PROXIMATE MECHANISMS OF SEXUAL SELECTION IN WOOD FROGS.

Richard D Howard1, Arnold G Kluge2.   

Abstract

Observations and several types of field experiments on the mating behavior of wood frogs have revealed the proximate mechanisms for a size-related reproductive advantage in both males and females. For females, larger individuals produce larger clutches; for males, larger individuals can better remain clasped to females when contested by rival males and can better depose males clasped to other females. No results obtained support of the existence of mate choice in either males or females. Males were estimated to be 4.74 times as variable as females in the number of zygotes produced per individual per season; however, much of the variation in male RS resulted from a male-biased sex ratio at the breeding site rather than from sexual selection. After taking sex ratio effects into consideration, males were estimated to be only 1.63 times as variable as females. Patterns of variation in RS in males and females are associated with numerous sex-specific differences in life history and morphology. Life history differences include differential growth rates, ages at sexual maturity, and rates of mortality. Interpretation of how the body size dimorphism (females larger than males) in this species relates to sexual selection is consistent with information on how similar variations in body size influence RS for each sex, and how males and females differ in the functional relationship between body size and RS. Average RS increases more with body size in females than in males. Although body size directly influences RS for females, the possibility exists that, for males, other anatomical features correlated with body size more directly affect RS. Preliminary evidence suggests that sexual selection influences male arm length and that the male body size : RS relationship results as an incidental correlation. © 1985 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Year:  1985        PMID: 28564216     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb05665.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  11 in total

1.  Is the large-male mating advantege in anurans an epiphenomenon?

Authors:  Julian C Lee
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Mating pattern variability among western toad (Bufo boreas) populations.

Authors:  Deanna H Olson; Andrew R Blaustein; Richard K O'Hara
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Sexual selection versus alternative causes of sexual dimorphism in teiid lizards.

Authors:  Roger A Anderson; Laurie J Vitt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Kin recognition by larval wood frogs (Rana sylvatica): effects of diet and prior exposure to conspecifics.

Authors:  George J Gamboa; Keith A Berven; Randy A Schemidt; Thomas G Fishwild; Kelli M Jankens
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Kin recognition by tadpoles and froglets of the wood frog Rana sylvatica.

Authors:  Thomas J Cornell; Keith A Berven; George J Gamboa
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Body size and fecundity in the waterstrider Aquarius remigis: a test of Darwin's fecundity advantage hypothesis.

Authors:  Richard F Preziosi; Daphne J Fairbairn; Derek A Roff; Julie M Brennan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Sexual Dimorphism in the Chinese Endemic Species Hynobius maoershanensis (Urodela: Hynobiidae).

Authors:  Huiqun Chen; Rongping Bu; Meihong Ning; Bo Yang; Zhengjun Wu; Huayuan Huang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.231

8.  An Experimental Test of Buffer Utility as a Technique for Managing Pool-Breeding Amphibians.

Authors:  Jessica S Veysey Powell; Kimberly J Babbitt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Despite Buffers, Experimental Forest Clearcuts Impact Amphibian Body Size and Biomass.

Authors:  Jessica S Veysey Powell; Kimberly J Babbitt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Low reproductive skew despite high male-biased operational sex ratio in a glass frog with paternal care.

Authors:  Alexandra Mangold; Katharina Trenkwalder; Max Ringler; Walter Hödl; Eva Ringler
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.