Literature DB >> 28312916

Kin recognition by larval wood frogs (Rana sylvatica): effects of diet and prior exposure to conspecifics.

George J Gamboa1, Keith A Berven1, Randy A Schemidt1, Thomas G Fishwild1, Kelli M Jankens1.   

Abstract

We investigated kin recognition by larval wood frogs (Rana sylvatica) in blind laboratory experiments using spatial affinity as a recognition assay. Tadpoles reared with full-sibs displayed a significant preference for familiar full-sibs over unfamiliar non-kin, but failed to discriminate between unfamiliar full-sibs and unfamiliar paternal half-sibs. Tadpoles reared in social isolation (with or without maternal egg jelly) from the two-celled embryonic stage displayed a significant preference for unfamiliar full-sibs over unfamiliar non-kin. Tadpoles reared on a meat diet with their full-sibs: 1) exhibited a significant preference for unfamiliar full-sibs fed meat over unfamiliar non-kin fed meat, 2) failed to discriminate between unfamiliar full-sibs fed lettuce and unfamiliar non-kin fed meat, 3) exhibited a significant preference for unfamiliar non-kin fed meat over unfamiliar non-lin fed lettuce, 4) failed to discriminate between unfamiliar full-sibs fed meat and unfamiliar full-sibs fed lettuce, and 5) displayed a significant spatial preference for odors associated with meat (a familiar food) over odors associated with lettuce (an unfamiliar food). Our results, together with those of Cornell et al. (1989), indicate that the recognition cue of larval R. sylvatica has both genetic and environmental (dietary) components. Our findings establish that previous exposure to maternal egg jelly, kin, or conspecifics is not necessary for the development of kin recognition ability in larval R. sylvatica. Our results are more consistent with the self-learning of recognition cues (a form of phenotype matching) than with a recognition mechanism that involves a genetically fixed recognition template. Finally, our results indicate that increasing similarity between the recognition template and perceived cue does not necessarily result in increasing spatial affinity for kin.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kin recognition; Rana sylvatica; Tadpoles Wood frogs

Year:  1991        PMID: 28312916     DOI: 10.1007/BF00317596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Stages in the normal development of Rana pipiens larvae.

Authors:  A C TAYLOR; J J KOLLROS
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1946-01

2.  MATE CHOICE IN THE WOOD FROG, RANA SYLVATICA.

Authors:  Keith A Berven
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Kin recognition by tadpoles and froglets of the wood frog Rana sylvatica.

Authors:  Thomas J Cornell; Keith A Berven; George J Gamboa
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  A molecular approach to fertilization. I. Disulfide bonds in Xenopus laevis jelly coat and a molecular hypothesis for fertilization.

Authors:  D J Gusseck; J L Hedrick
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 3.582

5.  Kin recognition cues in Rana cascadae tadpoles.

Authors:  A R Blaustein; R K O'Hara
Journal:  Behav Neural Biol       Date:  1982-09

6.  "KIN RECOGNITION" AMONG SPADEFOOT TOAD TADPOLES: A SIDE-EFFECT OF HABITAT SELECTION?

Authors:  David W Pfennig
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  PROXIMATE MECHANISMS OF SEXUAL SELECTION IN WOOD FROGS.

Authors:  Richard D Howard; Arnold G Kluge
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Genetic control for sibling recognition?

Authors:  A R Blaustein; R K O'Hara
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-03-19       Impact factor: 49.962

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  The ontogeny of kin recognition in tadpoles of the toad Bufo melanostictus (Anura; bufonidae).

Authors:  S K Saidapur; S Girish
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Plasticity for the kin and conspecific preferences in the frog tadpoles (Rana ornativentris).

Authors:  Kazuko Hase; Nobuyuki Kutsukake
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 2.899

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.