Literature DB >> 28561970

AERODYNAMICS, THERMOREGULATION, AND THE EVOLUTION OF INSECT WINGS: DIFFERENTIAL SCALING AND EVOLUTIONARY CHANGE.

Joel G Kingsolver1, M A R Koehl1.   

Abstract

We examine several aerodynamic and thermoregulatory hypotheses about possible adaptive factors in the evolution of wings from small winglets in insects. Using physical models of Paleozoic insects in a wind tunnel, we explore the potential effects of wings for increasing gliding distance, increasing dispersal distance during parachuting, improving attitude control or stability, and elevating body temperatures during thermoregulation. The effects of body size and shape, wing length, number, and venation, and meteorological conditions are considered. Hypotheses consistent with both fixed and moveable wing articulations are examined. Short wings have no significant effects on any of the aerodynamic characteristics, relative to wingless models, while large wings do have significant effects. In contrast, short wings have large thermoregulatory effects relative to wingless models, but further increases in wing length do not significantly affect thermoregulatory performance. At any body size, there is a wing length below which there are significant thermoregulatory effects of increasing wing length, and above which there are significant aerodynamic effects of increasing wing length. The relative wing length at which this transition occurs decreases with increasing body size. These results suggest that there could be no effective selection for increasing wing length in wingless or short-winged insects in relation to increased aerodynamic capacity. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that insect wings initially served a thermoregulatory function and were used for aerodynamic functions only at larger wing lengths and/or body sizes. Thus, we propose that thermoregulation was the primary adaptive factor in the early evolution of wings that preadapted them for the subsequent evolution of flight. Our results illustrate an evolutionary mechanism in which a purely isometric change in body size may produce a qualitative change in the function of a given structure. We propose a hypothesis in which the transition from thermoregulatory to aerodynamic function for wings involved only isometric changes in body size and argue that changes in body form were not a prerequisite for this major evolutionary change in function. © 1985 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Year:  1985        PMID: 28561970     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00390.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

1.  Molecular phylogenetic analysis of evolutionary trends in stonefly wing structure and locomotor behavior.

Authors:  M A Thomas; K A Walsh; M R Wolf; B A McPheron; J H Marden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The adaptive significance of alpine melanism in the butterfly Parnassius phoebus F. (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae).

Authors:  C S Guppy
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Varying and unchanging whiteness on the wings of dusk-active and shade-inhabiting Carystoides escalantei butterflies.

Authors:  Dengteng Ge; Gaoxiang Wu; Lili Yang; Hye-Na Kim; Winnie Hallwachs; John M Burns; Daniel H Janzen; Shu Yang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Recalibration of the insect evolutionary time scale using Monte San Giorgio fossils suggests survival of key lineages through the End-Permian Extinction.

Authors:  Matteo Montagna; K Jun Tong; Giulia Magoga; Laura Strada; Andrea Tintori; Simon Y W Ho; Nathan Lo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Evolution of natural agents: preservation, advance, and emergence of functional information.

Authors:  Alexei A Sharov
Journal:  Biosemiotics       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 0.711

6.  Physical and behavioral adaptations to prevent overheating of the living wings of butterflies.

Authors:  Cheng-Chia Tsai; Richard A Childers; Norman Nan Shi; Crystal Ren; Julianne N Pelaez; Gary D Bernard; Naomi E Pierce; Nanfang Yu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Biological constraints as norms in evolution.

Authors:  Mathilde Tahar
Journal:  Hist Philos Life Sci       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 1.205

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.