Literature DB >> 28561816

Validity and reliability of three-dimensional scanning compared to conventional anthropometry for children and adolescents: methodological mistake.

Siamak Sabour1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28561816     DOI: 10.1038/pr.2017.73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Res        ISSN: 0031-3998            Impact factor:   3.756


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Reliability of a new modified tear breakup time method: methodological and statistical issues.

Authors:  Siamak Sabour
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Re: does the experience level of the radiologist, assessment in consensus, or the addition of the abduction and external rotation view improve the diagnostic reproducibility and accuracy of MRA of the shoulder?

Authors:  S Sabour
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Reliability of the ASA physical status scale in clinical practice: methodological issues.

Authors:  S Sabour
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Reliability of the International Spinal Cord Injury Musculoskeletal Basic Data Set; methodological and statistical issue to avoid misinterpretation.

Authors:  Siamak Sabour; Fariba Ghassemi
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2016-09-22

5.  Validity and reliability of the robotic objective structured assessment of technical skills.

Authors:  Siamak Sabour
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Accuracy and reproducibility of the ETDRS visual acuity chart: methodological issues.

Authors:  Siamak Sabour; Fariba Ghassemi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Adherence to guidelines strongly improves reproducibility of brachial artery flow-mediated dilation. Common mistakes and methodological issue.

Authors:  Siamak Sabour
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 5.162

8.  Validity and intraobserver reliability of three-dimensional scanning compared with conventional anthropometry for children and adolescents from a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Fabian Glock; Mandy Vogel; Stephanie Naumann; Andreas Kuehnapfel; Markus Scholz; Andreas Hiemisch; Toralf Kirsten; Kristin Rieger; Antje Koerner; Markus Loeffler; Wieland Kiess
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.756

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Response to Sabour.

Authors:  Fabian Glock; Markus Scholz; Andreas Kuehnapfel; Wieland Kiess
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.756

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.