Literature DB >> 28053766

Reliability of the International Spinal Cord Injury Musculoskeletal Basic Data Set; methodological and statistical issue to avoid misinterpretation.

Siamak Sabour1, Fariba Ghassemi2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diseases; Medical research

Year:  2016        PMID： 28053766      PMCID： PMC5129442          DOI： 10.1038/scsandc.2016.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases        ISSN： 2058-6124


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Reliability of a new modified tear breakup time method: methodological and statistical issues.

Authors:  Siamak Sabour
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Reliability of automatic vibratory equipment for ultrasonic strain measurement of the median nerve: common mistake.

Authors:  Siamak Sabour
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Re: does the experience level of the radiologist, assessment in consensus, or the addition of the abduction and external rotation view improve the diagnostic reproducibility and accuracy of MRA of the shoulder?

Authors:  S Sabour
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Spinal instability neoplastic scale: methodologic issues to avoid misinterpretation.

Authors:  Siamak Sabour
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Reproducibility of dynamic Scheimpflug-based pneumotonometer and its correlation with a dynamic bidirectional pneumotonometry device: methodological issues.

Authors:  Siamak Sabour
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Validity and reliability of the 13C-methionine breath test for the detection of moderate hyperhomocysteinemia in Mexican adults; statistical issues in validity and reliability analysis.

Authors:  Siamak Sabour
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.694
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Validity and reliability of three-dimensional scanning compared to conventional anthropometry for children and adolescents: methodological mistake.

Authors:  Siamak Sabour
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.756
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.