| Literature DB >> 28561763 |
Jonathan A Cammack1, Jeffery K Tomberlin2.
Abstract
This study examined the impact of diet protein and carbohydrate percentages as well as moisture on the immature development, survivorship, and resulting adult longevity and egg production of the black soldier fly, Hermetiaillucens (L.) (Diptera: Stratiomyidae). Moisture impacted development and corresponding life-history traits more than protein:carbohydrate content; larvae were unable to develop on diets at 40% moisture. Larvae fed diets at 70% moisture developed faster, grew larger, and required less food than those reared on diets at 55% moisture. Larvae reared on the balanced diet (21% protein:21% carbohydrate) at 70% moisture developed the fastest on the least amount of food and had the greatest survivorship to the prepupal stage. Adult emergence and longevity were similar across treatments, indicating immature life-history traits were impacted the most. The control (Gainesville house fly) diet was superior to the artificial diets for all parameters tested. These differences could indicate that other constituents (e.g., associated microbes) serve a role in black soldier fly development. These data are valuable for industrialization of this insect as a "green" technology for recycling organic waste, which can be highly variable, to produce protein for use as feed in the livestock, poultry, and aquaculture industries, as well as for bioenergy production.Entities:
Keywords: alternate protein production; artificial diet; mass rearing; nutrition ecology
Year: 2017 PMID: 28561763 PMCID: PMC5492070 DOI: 10.3390/insects8020056
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Nutrient content of five different waste streams and black soldier fly prepupae produced from each resource. Modified from Nguyen et al. [11].
| Quantity/100 g | Poultry Feed | Swine Liver | Swine Manure | Restaurant Waste | Fruits and Vegetables | Fish Rendering | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waste Stream | Calories | 310.48 | 442.68 | 295.23 | 484.32 | 375 | 502.76 |
| Protein (g) | 18.02 | 76.71 | 22.66 | 20.41 | 20.07 | 50 | |
| Fat (g) | 2.52 | 12.84 | 1.4 | 19.58 | 1.55 | 36.18 | |
| Carbohydrate (g) | 53.62 | 4.74 | 47.61 | 56.79 | 68.95 | 0.55 | |
| Protein:carbohydrate | 1:2.97 | 16.18:1 | 1:2.1 | 1:2.78 | 1:3.44 | 90.9:1 | |
| Resulting BSF * Prepupae | Calories | 130 | 214 | − | − | 105 | 233 |
| Protein (g) | 14.7 | 21 | − | 21.2 | 12.9 | 19.4 | |
| Fat (g) | 4.02 | 8.39 | − | − | 2.22 | 11.6 | |
| Carbohydrate (g) | 8.75 | 13.7 | − | − | 8.38 | 12.7 |
* BSF = black soldier fly.
Figure 1Feeding duration (days) and amount of feed (g) required for 40% of the black soldier fly larvae feeding on a diet treatment to reach the prepupal stage in an incubator set at 30°C, 70% RH, on a 14L:10D cycle. Uppercase letters indicate significant differences in duration of the feeding stage, and lowercase letters indicate significant differences in the amount of feed required for 40% of the larvae to reach the prepupal stage (ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer HSD, α = 0.05). 1 Treatments are presented as protein:carbohydrate-moisture; * indicates significant difference in duration between trials.
Figure 2Mean weight (g) of black soldier fly prepupae produced on a diet treatment in an incubator set at 30 °C, 70% RH, on a 14L:10D cycle. Letters indicate significant differences (ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer HSD, α = 0.05). 1 Treatments are presented as protein:carbohydrate-moisture; * indicates significant difference between trials.
Figure 3(A) Effects of diet protein:carbohydrate on percent pupation. (B) Effects of diet moisture on percent pupation. Letters (ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer HSD) or asterisk (t-test) indicate significant differences (α = 0.05) for each corresponding diet parameter.
Figure 4(A) Effects of diet protein:carbohydrate on percent adult emergence. (B) Effects of diet moisture on percent adult emergence. Letters (ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer HSD) or asterisk (t-test) indicate significant differences (α = 0.05) for each corresponding diet parameter.
Duration of black soldier fly larval development and survival to the prepupal stage when reared on different diets.
| Study | Diet | Mean Duration (d = Day) of Larval Development ± SE | Percent Survival 2 ± SE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Myers et al. [ | Cow (Dairy) Manure | 30.4 ± 0.1 | 77.3 ± 4.55 |
| Nguyen et al. [ | Poultry Feed | 23.0 ± 0.6 | 80.8 ± NA |
| Pork Liver | 22.5 ± 0.7 | 57.2 ± NA | |
| Swine Manure | 34.0 ± 1.4 | 74.3 ± NA | |
| Kitchen Waste | 23.8 ± 0.4 | 46.7 ± NA | |
| Fruits and Vegetables | 28.7 ± 0.8 | 76.7 ± NA | |
| Fish Offal | 26.5 ± 0.9 | 47.2 ± NA | |
| Oonincx et al. [ | HPHF | 21 ± 1.4 | 86 ± 18.0 |
| HPLF | 33 ± 5.4 | 77 ± 19.8 | |
| LPHF | 37 ± 10.6 | 72 ± 12.9 | |
| LPLF | 37 ± 5.8 | 74 ± 23.5 | |
| Control | 21 ± 1.1 | 75 ± 31.0 | |
| Current Study 3 | Control (T1) 4 | 23.5 ± 0.4 | 87.0 ± 3.30 |
| (T2) | 21.8 ± 0.4 | ||
| 7:35–55 | 45.3 ± 0.7 | 48.9 ± 3.30 | |
| 7:35–70 | 35.5 ± 0.7 | 57.8 ± 3.30 | |
| 21:21–55 | 38.4 ± 0.7 | 56.7 ± 3.30 | |
| 21:21–70 (T1) 5 | 32.3 ± 0.7 | 68.2 ± 1.96 | |
| (T2) | 56.0 ± 1.96 | ||
| 35:7–55 | 45.6 ± 0.7 | 46.0 ± 3.30 | |
| 35:7–70 | 32.9 ± 0.7 | 52.9 ± 3.53 |
1 Larval development is the median amount of time taken to reach the prepupal stage. 2 SE is not presented for the study by Nguyen et al. [41], as the data are published as percent mortality. Data were transformed to percent survival for consistency. Additionally, the SE presented for the current study is the pooled SE calculated by JMP during the statistical analyses. 3 Treatments are presented as protein:carbohydrate-moisture. 4 Mean duration of larval development was significantly faster in Trial 2, but percent survival was not significantly different between trials. 5 Percent survival was significantly higher in Trial 1, but mean duration of larval development was not significantly different between trials. 6 HPHF: high protein, high fat, HPLF: high protein, low fat, LPHF: low protein, high fat, LPLF: low protein, low fat.
Percent difference in black soldier fly larval development from three previous studies to data generated in the current study.
| Study 1 | Diet | Duration 2 (Days) of Larval Development ± SE | Percent Difference between Published Studies and Current Study 3 Data | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 7:35–55 | 7:35–70 | 21:21–55 | 21:21–70 | 35:7–55 | 35:7–70 | |||
| Myers et al. [ | Cow (Dairy) Manure | 30.4 ± 0.1 |
| +39% | +15% | +23% | +6% | +40% | +8% |
| Nguyen et al. [ | Poultry Feed | 23.0 ± 0.6 |
| +65% | +43% | +50% | +34% | +66% | +35% |
| Pork Liver | 22.5 ± 0.7 | +0.6% | +67% | +45% | +52% | +36% | +68% | +37% | |
| Swine Manure | 34.0 ± 1.4 |
| +28% | +4% | +12% |
| +29% |
| |
| Kitchen Waste | 23.8 ± 0.4 |
| +62% | +39% | +47% | +30% | +63% | +32% | |
| Fruits and Vegetables | 28.7 ± 0.8 |
| +45% | +21% | +29% | +12% | +46% | +14% | |
| Fish Offal | 26.5 ± 0.9 |
| +52% | +29% | +37% | +20% | +53% | +21% | |
| Oonincx et al. [ | HPHF | 21 ± 1.4 | +7% | +73% | +51% | +59% | +43% | +74% | +44% |
| HPLF | 33 ± 5.4 |
| +31% | +7% | +15% |
| +32% |
| |
| LPHF | 37 ± 10.6 |
| +20% |
| +4% |
| +21% |
| |
| LPLF | 37 ± 5.8 |
| +20% |
| +4% |
| +21% |
| |
| Control | 21 ± 1.1 | +7% | +73% | +51% | +59% | +43% | +74% | +44% | |
| Mean difference |
| +48% | +25% | +32% | +16% | +49% | +17% | ||
1 Each study used slightly different methods: Nguyen et al [41] conducted the experiment at 28 °C, Myers et al. [14] at 27 °C, and Oonincx et al. [12] at 28 °C. 2 Myers et al. [14] present data as mean time to complete larval development (d), Nguyen et al. [41] present data as median time (d) to reach the prepupal stage, and Oonincx et al. [12] present data as mean time (d) to collection of first prepupae. 3 Treatments are presented as Protein:Carbohydrate-Moisture. 4 HPHF: high protein, high fat, HPLF: high protein, low fat, LPHF: low protein, high fat, LPLF: low protein, low fat. Bold numbers indicate faster development in the current study.
Percent difference in black soldier fly larval survival from three previous studies to data generated in the current study.
| Study 1 | Diet | Percent Survival ± SE | Percent Difference between Published Studies and Current Study 2 Data | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 7:35–55 | 7:35–70 | 21:21–55 | 21:21–70 | 35:7–55 | 35:7–70 | |||
| Myers et al. [ | Cow (Dairy) Manure | 77.3 ± 4.55 |
| −45% | −29% | −31% | −22% | −51% | −37% |
| Nguyen et al. [ | Poultry Feed | 80.8 ± NA |
| −49% | −33% | −35% | −26% | −55% | −42% |
| Pork Liver | 57.2 ± NA |
| −16% |
| −1% |
| −22% | −8% | |
| Swine Manure | 74.3 ± NA |
| −41% | −25% | −27% | −18% | −47% | −34% | |
| Kitchen Waste | 46.7 ± NA |
|
|
|
|
| −2% |
| |
| Fruits and Vegetables | 76.7 ± NA |
| −44% | −28% | −30% | −21% | −50% | −37% | |
| Fish Offal | 47.2 ± NA |
|
|
|
|
| −3% |
| |
| Oonincx et al. [ | HPHF | 86 ± 18.0 |
| −55% | −39% | −41% | −32% | −61% | −48% |
| HPLF | 77 ± 19.8 |
| −45% | −28% | −30% | −21% | −51% | −37% | |
| LPHF | 72 ± 12.9 |
| −38% | −22% | −24% | −15% | −44% | −31% | |
| LPLF | 74 ± 23.5 |
| −41% | −25% | −26% | −17% | −47% | −33% | |
| Control | 75 ± 31.0 |
| −42% | −25% | −28% | −19% | −48% | −35% | |
| Mean difference |
| −16% | −6% | −7% | −2% | −19% | −11% | ||
1 Each study used slightly different methods: Myers et al. [14] conducted the experiment at 27 °C, Nguyen et al. [41] at 28 °C, and Oonincx et al. [12] at 28 °C. 2 Treatments are presented as Protein:Carbohydrate-Moisture. 3 HPHF: high protein, high fat, HPLF: high protein, low fat, LPHF: low protein, high fat, LPLF: low protein, low fat. Bold numbers indicate greater survival in the current study.