| Literature DB >> 32593171 |
Moritz Gold1,2, Melanie Binggeli1, Fabienne Kurt3, Tomas de Wouters3, Markus Reichlin3, Christian Zurbrügg2, Alexander Mathys1, Michael Kreuzer4.
Abstract
Large-scale insect rearing for food and feed production can be improved by understanding diet digestion and host-microbe interactions. To examine these processes in black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens L.; Diptera: Stratiomyidae) larvae, two protocols were developed. Protocol 1 describes a method to produce viable, sterile black soldier fly larvae and a gentle method for diet sterilization. Sterile black soldier fly larvae can be used to study the diverse role of microbes in larval development. Nutrient requirements of sterile black soldier fly larvae are met only through diet. Viable sterile black soldier fly larvae were consistently generated using a four-step treatment with alternating immersions of eggs for 2 min each in ethanol (70%) and sodium hypochlorite (0.6%), over two cycles. A nonthermal method of diet sterilization, namely high-energy electron beam (HEEB) treatment, was introduced. Subsequently, growth of sterile black soldier fly larvae was observed on the HEEB-treated diets (40, 60, and 40% of replicates with poultry feed, liver pie, and an artificial diet, respectively) but not on autoclaved diets. In Protocol 2, we propose a novel method to collect frass from individual larvae. We then measured the metabolites in frass, using high-pressure liquid chromatography. Results on metabolites confirmed the influence of digestion. For instance, succinate increased from 1 to 2 and 7 μmol/g sample from diet to gut homogenate and frass, respectively. The collection method is a promising tool to estimate the diet and nutrient requirements of black soldier fly larvae, thus increasing the performance and reliability of black soldier fly larvae rearing. We discuss in detail the possible applications and limitations of our methods in black soldier fly larvae research.Entities:
Keywords: digestion; frass collection; insect; microorganism; sterile
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32593171 PMCID: PMC7320877 DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/ieaa057
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Insect Sci ISSN: 1536-2442 Impact factor: 1.857
Established sterilization methods for the production of sterile insects, as described in literature
| Insect species | Method | Reference |
|---|---|---|
|
| Immersion in a solution with 10% formaldehyde and 0.2% hydrochloric acid for 10 min, followed by four washing cycles with sterile, double distilled water |
|
|
| Immersion in 2.7% sodium hypochlorite for 2 min, two washing cycles with 70% ethanol, followed by two washing cycles with sterile, distilled water |
|
|
| Immersion in 10% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min, rinsed three times with sterile water |
|
|
| Three washing cycles with 0.6% sodium hypochlorite, followed by three washing cycles with sterile water |
|
|
| Immersion in 2.7% sodium hypochlorite for 2–3 min, followed by two washing cycles with 70% ethanol and three washing cycles with sterile water for 10 min |
|
|
| Two washing cycles with 0.6% sodium hypochlorite for 2.5 min each, followed by three washing cycles with sterile water |
|
|
| Three washing cycles with 0.6% sodium hypochlorite, followed by three rinsing cycles with sterile water |
|
|
| Immersion in 1% active chlorine (50% bleach) for 5 min, two washing cycles with 70% ethanol for 1 min and sterile water for 1 min |
|
|
| Immersion in 0.05% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min, followed by immersion in 5% formaldehyde for 5 min, washed with sterile distilled water |
|
|
| Immersion in 0.26% sodium hypochlorite for 25 min, followed by three washing cycles with sterile water |
|
|
| Three washing cycles with 70% ethanol followed by three washing cycles with sterile water |
|
Sterilization treatments tested to generate sterile black soldier fly eggs (Protocol 1)
| Series | Treatment | Chemicals | Concentrations (% v/v) | Duration (min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | (a) 3× NaClO | (a) 0.6 | (a) 2 + 2 + 2 |
| 2 | (a) 1× NaClO (b) 2× C2H5OH | (a) 2.7 (b) 70 | (a) 2 (b) 1 + 1 | |
| 3 | (a) 1× NaClO | (a) 10 | (a) 5 | |
| 4 | (a) 1× NaClO (b) 1× C2H5OH | (a) 10 (b) 70 | (a) 5 (b) 5 | |
| 5 | (a) 3× C2H5OH | (a) 70 | (a) 5, 1 + 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | (a) 3× NaClO | (a) 0.6 | (a) 2 + 2 + 2 |
| 7 | (a) 1× NaClO (b) 2× C2H5OH | (a) 2.7 (b) 70 | (a) 2 (b) 1 + 1 | |
| 8 | (a) 1× NaClO (b) 1× C2H5OH | (a) 10 (b) 70 | (a) 5 (b) 5 | |
| 9 | (a) 1× C2H5OH (b) 1× NaClO | (a) 70 (b) 0.6 | (a) 1 (b) 1 | |
| 3 | 10 | (a) 1× NaClO (b) 2× C2H5OH | (a) 2.7 (b) 70 | (a) 2 (b) 1 + 1 |
| 11 | (a) 1× C2H5OH (b) 1× NaClO (c) 1× C2H5OH (d) 1× NaClO | (a, c) 70 (b, d) 0.6 | (a, c) 2 (b, d) 2 | |
| 12 | (a) 2× C2H5OH (b) 1× NaClO:C2H5OH = 1:1 | (a) 70 (b) 10, 70 | (a) 2 (b) 2 |
(a), (b), (c), (d) = subsequent steps; all eggs were washed three times with sterile water after NaClO and/or C2H5OH treatments.
NaClO = sodium hypochlorite; C2H5OH = ethanol.
Effect of sterilization treatments (Protocol 1) on egg sterility, larval hatching, and growth determined by inoculation of eggs in thioglycollate broth and on Columbia blood agar
| Series |
| Treatment | Egg sterility (% of replicates) | Larval hatching (% of replicates) | Larval growth (% of replicates) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | n.d. | 100 |
| 1 | 2 | 0 | n.d. | 100 | |
| 1 | 3 | 0 | 100 | 100 | |
| 1 | 4 | 0 | 100 | 100 | |
| 1 | 5 | 0 | 100 | 100 | |
| 1 | Untreated | 0 | 100 | 100 | |
| 1 | H2O control | 0 | 100 | 100 | |
| 2 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
| 3 | 7 | 33 | 100 | 33 (nonsterile replicates) | |
| 3 | 8 | 33 | 100 | 66 (nonsterile replicates) | |
| 3 | 9 | 0 | 100 | 100 | |
| 3 | Untreated | 0 | 100 | 100 | |
| 3 | H2O control | 0 | 100 | 100 | |
| 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 100 | 66 |
| 3 | 11 | 100 | 100 | 0 | |
| 3 | 12 | 0 | 100 | 66 | |
| 3 | Untreated | 0 | 100 | 100 | |
| 3 | H2O control | 0 | 100 | 100 |
n = number of replicates; n.d. = not detected.
Effect of various diets in combination with diet sterilization treatments on larval sterility, hatching, and growth
| Diet | Sterilization treatment |
| Larval sterility (% of replicates) | Larval hatching (% of replicates) | Larval growth (% of replicates) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial diet 1 | Autoclave | 5 | 100 | n.d. | 0 |
| Artificial diet 2 | Autoclave | 5 | 100 | n.d. | 0 |
| Artificial diet 3 | Autoclave | 5 | 100 | n.d. | 0 |
| Artificial diet 4 | Autoclave | 5 | 100 | n.d. | 0 |
| Poultry feed | HEEB | 5 | 100 | 100 | 40 |
| Liver pie | HEEB | 5 | 100 | 100 | 60 |
| Artificial diet | HEEB | 5 | 100 | 100 | 40 |
| Untreated | Untreated | 5 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
| H2O control | Untreated | 5 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
Eggs used were sterilized with Treatment 11 (listed in Table 2) (Protocol 1). n = number of replicates; n.d. = not detected.
Fig. 1.Method to attach frass collection device to black soldier fly larvae: (a) square cut from plastic sheet, side length approximately 1.5 times the larval diameter; (b) application of instant glue; (c) attaching to larval rear, as low as possible to allow movement, yet high enough to enable frass excretion; (d) plastic sheet rolled around larvae and sealed; (e) sealing bottom end of plastic sheet with glue; (f) black soldier fly larvae larva with collected frass, following feeding for 24 h on poultry feed and separation from the residue.
Metabolites (µmol/g) detected in poultry feed, larval gut homogenate (composite of three larvae guts), and larval frass (composite from 25 larvae) (Protocol 2)
| Compound | Poultry feed | Larval gut homogenate | Larval frass |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose | 30.7 | 12.4 | 182.3 |
| Galactose | 20.3 | 1.0 | 6.4 |
| Citrate | 8.3 | 0.8 | 0 |
| Succinate | 1.1 | 1.6 | 6.5 |
| Lactate | 3.2 | 3.2 | 183.1 |
| Formate | 11.6 | 3.9 | 18.0 |
| Acetate | 1.8 | 2.7 | 65.6 |
| Propionate | 2.2 | 2.7 | 4.7 |
| Ethanol | 0 | 3.9 | 18.8 |