| Literature DB >> 28561069 |
F Passamonti1, T Giorgino2, B Mora1, P Guglielmelli3, E Rumi4, M Maffioli1, A Rambaldi5, M Caramella6, R Komrokji7, J Gotlib8, J J Kiladjian9, F Cervantes10, T Devos11, F Palandri12, V De Stefano13, M Ruggeri14, R T Silver15, G Benevolo16, F Albano17, D Caramazza1, M Merli1, D Pietra4, R Casalone18, G Rotunno3, T Barbui19, M Cazzola4, A M Vannucchi3.
Abstract
Polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are myeloproliferative neoplasms with variable risk of evolution into post-PV and post-ET myelofibrosis, from now on referred to as secondary myelofibrosis (SMF). No specific tools have been defined for risk stratification in SMF. To develop a prognostic model for predicting survival, we studied 685 JAK2, CALR, and MPL annotated patients with SMF. Median survival of the whole cohort was 9.3 years (95% CI: 8-not reached-NR-). Through penalized Cox regressions we identified negative predictors of survival and according to beta risk coefficients we assigned 2 points to hemoglobin level <11 g/dl, to circulating blasts ⩾3%, and to CALR-unmutated genotype, 1 point to platelet count <150 × 109/l and to constitutional symptoms, and 0.15 points to any year of age. Myelofibrosis Secondary to PV and ET-Prognostic Model (MYSEC-PM) allocated SMF patients into four risk categories with different survival (P<0.0001): low (median survival NR; 133 patients), intermediate-1 (9.3 years, 95% CI: 8.1-NR; 245 patients), intermediate-2 (4.4 years, 95% CI: 3.2-7.9; 126 patients), and high risk (2 years, 95% CI: 1.7-3.9; 75 patients). Finally, we found that the MYSEC-PM represents the most appropriate tool for SMF decision-making to be used in clinical and trial settings.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28561069 DOI: 10.1038/leu.2017.169
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leukemia ISSN: 0887-6924 Impact factor: 11.528