Literature DB >> 28559751

Analysis of Patient Outcomes Using the MyoKinesthetic System for the Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Case Series.

Kari Brody1, Alan M Nasypany2, Russell T Baker2, James M May2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this case series was to test the feasibility of using the MyoKinesthetic (MYK) System as a treatment-based classification system and intervention for a sample of patients with low back pain.
METHODS: This within-subject intervention was completed in a university athletic training clinic. Nine participants (mean age: 31 years) with a primary complaint of LBP were evaluated and included. An athletic trainer performed the initial assessment, which contained the following components: patient history, palpation, range of motion testing, lower quarter neurologic screening, MYK System posture screen, orthopedic special tests, and baseline data for pain intensity, disability, and function. All participants were treated with the MYK System. The primary outcomes were pain, disability, function, active range of motion, posture, and global efficacy of treatment.
RESULTS: The mean number of MYK treatments administered was 12.11 (SD = 6.25), and the mean number of days until discharge was 28.67 (SD = 9.38). A repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in pain, disability, function, and posture from the initial evaluation to discharge and from the initial evaluation to a 1-month follow-up (P < .01).
CONCLUSION: This study determined the feasibility of further evaluation of the MYK System as a treatment-based classification system and intervention for patients with low back pain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low Back Pain; Spinal Nerves; Therapeutics

Year:  2017        PMID: 28559751      PMCID: PMC5440689          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2017.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chiropr Med        ISSN: 1556-3707


  42 in total

Review 1.  The effectiveness of sub-group specific manual therapy for low back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah L Slater; Jon J Ford; Matthew C Richards; Nicholas F Taylor; Luke D Surkitt; Andrew J Hahne
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2012-03-03

2.  Preliminary development of a clinical prediction rule for determining which patients with low back pain will respond to a stabilization exercise program.

Authors:  Gregory E Hicks; Julie M Fritz; Anthony Delitto; Stuart M McGill
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  John D Childs; Sara R Piva; Julie M Fritz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The use of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale to measure rehabilitative progress in a physiotherapy setting.

Authors:  Paul Nicholas; Cheryl Hefford; Steve Tumilty
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-08

5.  Efficacy of the addition of modified Pilates exercises to a minimal intervention in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Gisela C Miyamoto; Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa; Thalissa Galvanin; Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2012-10-11

6.  Motor control exercise for chronic low back pain: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Leonardo O P Costa; Christopher G Maher; Jane Latimer; Paul W Hodges; Robert D Herbert; Kathryn M Refshauge; James H McAuley; Matthew D Jennings
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-11-05

7.  Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design.

Authors:  Steven J Kamper; Christopher G Maher; Grant Mackay
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2009

8.  Outcomes are not different for patient-matched versus nonmatched treatment in subjects with chronic recurrent low back pain: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sharon M Henry; Linda R Van Dillen; Rebecca H Ouellette-Morton; Juvena R Hitt; Karen V Lomond; Michael J DeSarno; Janice Y Bunn
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Pragmatic application of a clinical prediction rule in primary care to identify patients with low back pain with a good prognosis following a brief spinal manipulation intervention.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; John D Childs; Timothy W Flynn
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  The effectiveness of the McKenzie method in addition to first-line care for acute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Luciana A C Machado; Chris G Maher; Rob D Herbert; Helen Clare; James H McAuley
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.