Literature DB >> 20046623

Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design.

Steven J Kamper, Christopher G Maher, Grant Mackay.   

Abstract

Most clinicians ask their patients to rate whether their health condition has improved or deteriorated over time and then use this information to guide management decisions. Many studies also use patient-rated change as an outcome measure to determine the efficacy of a particular treatment. Global rating of change (GRC) scales provide a method of obtaining this information in a manner that is quick, flexible, and efficient. As with any outcome measure, however, meaningful interpretation of results can only be undertaken with due consideration of the clinimetric properties, strengths, and weaknesses of the instrument. The purpose of this article is to summarize this information to assist appropriate interpretation of the GRC results and to provide evidence-informed advice to guide design and administration of GRC scales. These considerations are relevant and applicable to the use of GRC scales both in the clinic and in research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinimetrics; Global Rating of Change; Outcome Measure

Year:  2009        PMID: 20046623      PMCID: PMC2762832          DOI: 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Man Manip Ther        ISSN: 1066-9817


  58 in total

Review 1.  Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness.

Authors:  D E Beaton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations.

Authors:  J A Husted; R J Cook; V T Farewell; D D Gladman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Measuring quality of life: methodological issues.

Authors:  M Dijkers
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.159

4.  Self-rated health showed a graded association with frequently used biomarkers in a large population sample.

Authors:  Marja Jylhä; Stefano Volpato; Jack M Guralnik
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Capturing the patient's view of change as a clinical outcome measure.

Authors:  D Fischer; A L Stewart; D A Bloch; K Lorig; D Laurent; H Holman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999 Sep 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  "Are you better?" A qualitative study of the meaning of recovery.

Authors:  D E Beaton; V Tarasuk; J N Katz; J G Wright; C Bombardier
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-06

7.  Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  R A Deyo; R M Centor
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

8.  Responsiveness of pain and disability measures for chronic whiplash.

Authors:  Mark Stewart; Christopher G Maher; Kathryn M Refshauge; Nikolai Bogduk; Michael Nicholas
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Clinimetric testing of three self-report outcome measures for low back pain patients in Brazil: which one is the best?

Authors:  Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa; Chris G Maher; Jane Latimer; Paulo Henrique Ferreira; Manuela Loureiro Ferreira; Giovanni Campos Pozzi; Ludmilla Motta Andrade Freitas
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Relationship of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) with three dynamic physical tests in a group of patients with chronic low-back and leg pain.

Authors:  M Grönblad; E Järvinen; H Hurri; M Hupli; E O Karaharju
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.442

View more
  300 in total

1.  Evaluation and treatment of musculoskeletal chest wall pain in a military athlete.

Authors:  Richard B Westrick; Edo Zylstra; Tamer Issa; Joseph M Miller; J Parry Gerber
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-06

2.  Content and bibliometric analyses of the Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy.

Authors:  Corey B Simon; Rogelio A Coronado; Wendy A Wurtzel; Daniel L Riddle; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2014-11

3.  Level of patient-physician agreement in assessment of change following conservative rehabilitation for shoulder pain.

Authors:  Stephanie D Moore-Reed; W Ben Kibler; Heather Bush; Tim L Uhl
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-07-15

4.  Clinician-Reported Outcome Assessments of Treatment Benefit: Report of the ISPOR Clinical Outcome Assessment Emerging Good Practices Task Force.

Authors:  John H Powers; Donald L Patrick; Marc K Walton; Patrick Marquis; Stefan Cano; Jeremy Hobart; Maria Isaac; Spiros Vamvakas; Ashley Slagle; Elizabeth Molsen; Laurie B Burke
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 5.725

5.  THE EFFECT OF AXIOSCAPULAR AND ROTATOR CUFF EXERCISE TRAINING SEQUENCE IN PATIENTS WITH SUBACROMIAL IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME: A RANDOMIZED CROSSOVER TRIAL.

Authors:  Edward P Mulligan; Mu Huang; Tara Dickson; Michael Khazzam
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-02

6.  The internal and external responsiveness of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and Short Form-12 Health Survey version 2 (SF-12 v2) in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Edmond P H Choi; Carlos K H Wong; Eric Y F Wan; James H L Tsu; W Y Chin; Kenny Kung; M K Yiu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Clinimetrics corner: the Global Rating of Change Score (GRoC) poorly correlates with functional measures and is not temporally stable.

Authors:  Craig Garrison; Chad Cook
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-11

8.  TIBIOFEMORAL JOINT MOBILIZATION IN THE SUCCESSFUL MANAGEMENT OF PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN SYNDROME: A CASE REPORT.

Authors:  Justin M Lantz; Alicia J Emerson-Kavchak; John J Mischke; Carol A Courtney
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-06

9.  Development of the University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index.

Authors:  Evan O Nelson; Michael Ryan; Erin AufderHeide; Bryan Heiderscheit
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 4.751

10.  Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Cough and Sputum in Patients with COPD.

Authors:  Patrícia Rebelo; Ana Oliveira; Cátia Paixão; Carla Valente; Lília Andrade; Alda Marques
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2020-01-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.