| Literature DB >> 28558710 |
Salah Abdelrazig1, Catharine A Ortori1, Gail Davey2, Wakgari Deressa3, Dhaba Mulleta4, David A Barrett1, Alemayehu Amberbir5, Andrew W Fogarty5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Currently available diagnostic techniques of Plasmodium falciparum infection are not optimal for non-invasive, population-based screening for malaria. It was hypothesized that a mass spectrometry-based metabolomics approach could identify urinary biomarkers of falciparum malaria.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarker; Falciparum; Malaria; Metabolomics; Urine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28558710 PMCID: PMC5450092 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-1875-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1UHPLC-HRMS base peak chromatograms (BPC) obtained from malaria and control urine samples. BPC of a malaria patients (ESI+), b healthy controls (ESI+), c malaria patients (ESI−) and d healthy controls (ESI−) analysed using a HILIC column. Amino acids such as l-alanine, l-tryptophan, tyrosine and phenylalanine were eluted within the retention time range of 5–6.5 min, whereas, organic acids such as 4-aminohippuric acid, homovanillic acid, lactic acid, uric acid and 2-hydroxyisobutyric acid were detected within a wider retention time window (0.5–5 min). Some urinary pyrimidine nucleosides such as cytidine and uridine were eluted within 2.5 min
Multivariate analysis and validation of OPLS-DA models of malaria patients and healthy controls
| Description | LC-MS |
|---|---|
| Peak detected | |
| ESI+ | 6278 |
| ESI− | 3466 |
| ESI+ and ESI− | 9744 |
| Cross-validation | |
| R2Y | 0.993 |
| Q2 | 0.583 |
| Permutation test | |
| Intercepta | −0.268 |
| External validation: classification (training/test models) | |
| Sensitivity (%) (true positive rate (TPR) = TP/(TP + FP) | 80% |
| Specificity (%) (true negative rate (TNR) = TN/(TN + FN) | 77% |
| Accuracy (%) = (TP + TN)/(TP + FP + TN + FN) | 78% |
| ROC curve (AUC)b (TPR vs FPR) | 0.83 |
| Classification based on a selected set of biomarkersc | |
| Sensitivity (%) | 91% |
| Specificity (%) | 91% |
| Accuracy (%) | 91% |
| ROC curve for individual set of metabolites | 0.92 |
aThe model is considered valid when the regression line of the permuted Q2 values intercept at, or below zero
bAUC: Area under receiver operating characteristic curve, which is the total area under the curve of sensitivity “true positive rate (TPR)” vs 1-specificity “false positive rate (FPR)”, ideal model gives AUC = 1
cSelected set of biomarkers were 1,3 diacetyl propane, 2-octanedioic acid, N-prolyl histidine, taurine, N-acetylputrescine, N-acetylasparagine, N-acetylspermidine and N-acetylglutamine
Fig. 2OPLS-DA score plots obtained from urinary metabolomic analysis of malaria patients and controls. a OPLS-DA model was built using control samples (C1; baseline, green circles, n = 25), (C2; follow-up, yellow circles, n = 22), malaria samples: baseline (PF1; red circles, n = 21) and after antimalarial treatment (PF2; light brown circles, n = 20) and pooled QC (dark blue squares), b presents OPLS-DA model generated from C1 and PF1 samples
Tentative identification of urinary biomarkers showing differences between malaria patients and healthy controls using UHPLC-HRMS
| Metabolite MW (Da) | Tentative identification | HMDB ID | Formula | RT (min) | q value | Fold change | Pathway/process | Confirmation of identity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60.0325 | Urea | HMDB00294 | CH4N2O | 1.45 | 2.51E−05 | 1.70 | Arginine and proline metabolism, urea cycle [ | (a) |
| 76.0160 | Glycolic acid | HMDB03035 | C2H4O2 | 3.88 | 1.50E−02 | 1.34 | Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism [ | (a) |
| 101.5395 | Unknown | – | – | 1.51 | 1.83E−04 | 8.03 | – | – |
| 113.0589 | Creatinine | HMDB00562 | C4H7N3O | 3.11 | 1.43E−02 | 1.13 | Arginine and proline metabolism [ | (a, c) |
| 118.0266 | Succinic acid | HMDB00254 | C4H6O4 | 3.08 | 4.99E−02 | 1.08 | Tricarboxylic acid cycle, Propanoate metabolism [ | (a, c) |
| 119.0582 |
| HMDB00167 | C4H9NO3 | 6.53 | 4.08E−04 | 3.02 | Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis [ | (a, c) |
| 125.0147 | Taurine | HMDB00251 | C2H7NO3S | 4.29 | 2.96E−05 | 5.39 | Taurine metabolism, Nitrogen metabolism [ | (a, c) |
| 128.0837 | 1,3-Diacetylpropane | HMDB29165 | C7H12O2 | 6.46 | 7.62E−04 | 35.89 | Polyamine metabolism [ | (a) |
| 129.0790 | Pipecolic acid | HMDB00070 | C6H11NO2 | 2.18 | 3.28E−02 | 1.34 | Lysine degradation [ | (a) |
| 130.1106 | N-Acetylputrescine | HMDB02064 | C6H14N2O | 6.62 | 3.23E−04 | 1.69 | Arginine and proline metabolism [ | (a, b) |
| 139.0633 | 3,4-Dihydroxybenzylamine | HMDB12153 | C7H9NO2 | 3.25 | 7.57E−04 | 2.00 | Not available | (a) |
| 162.0528 | 3-Hydroxyadipic acid | HMDB00345 | C6H10O5 | 1.50 | 2.66E−05 | 3.40 | Fatty acid metabolism [ | (a) |
| 172.0736 | 2-Octenedioic acid | HMDB00341 | C8H12O4 | 6.46 | 1.52E−04 | 7.20 | Fatty acid metabolism [ | (a, b) |
| 174.1546 | N-Acetylasparagine | HMDB06028 | C6H10N2O4 | 3.61 | 7.33E−06 | 2.27 | Asparagine catabolism [ | (a) |
| 187.1685 | N-Acetylspermidine | HMDB01276 | C9H21N3O | 11.90 | 9.18E−05 | 1.72 | Polyamine metabolism [ | (a, b) |
| 188.0797 | N-Acetylglutamine | HMDB06029 | C7H12N2O4 | 3.59 | 2.30E−04 | 3.33 | Not available | (a) |
| 188.1525 | Trimethyl- | HMDB01325 | C9H20N2O2 | 7.41 | 9.44E−07 | 2.60 | Carnitine biosynthesis [ | (a) |
| 195.0532 | 3-Hydroxyhippuric acid | HMDB06116 | C9H9NO4 | 4.05 | 2.05E−03 | -3.00 | Fatty acid metabolism [ | (a) |
| 208.0955 | Unknown | – | – | 6.80 | 1.46E−03 | 4.44 | – | |
| 209.0434 | Unknown | – | – | 1.41 | 3.80E−07 | 2.18 | – | |
| 210.0528 | Vanilpyruvic acid | HMDB11714 | C10H10O5 | 1.46 | 1.56E−03 | 4.36 | Vanilactic acid biosynthesis [ | (a) |
| 212.0794 | Unknown | – | – | 3.88 | 1.43E−05 | 3.36 | – | – |
| 217.1063 | Alanyl-glutamine | HMDB28685 | C8H15N3O4 | 6.87 | 2.45E−05 | 5.45 | Protein catabolism [ | (a) |
| 244.0694 | Uridine | HMDB00296 | C9H12N2O6 | 1.64 | 6.83E−07 | 1.63 | Pyrimidine metabolism [ | (a, c) |
| 252.1222 | Prolyl-Histidine | HMDB29019 | C11H16N4O3 | 2.93 | 8.29E−05 | 5.86 | Protein catabolism [ | (a) |
| 268.0808 | Inosine | HMDB00195 | C10H12N4O5 | 1.42 | 2.17E−06 | 2.62 | Purine metabolism [ | (a, c) |
| 281.1124 | 1-Methyladenosine | HMDB03331 | C11H15N5O4 | 5.68 | 8.07E−05 | 1.51 | Not available | (a) |
| 282.0961 | 1-Methylinosine | HMDB02721 | C11H14N4O5 | 1.78 | 1.26E−03 | 2.15 | Not available | (a) |
| 285.0961 | N4-Acetylcytidine | HMDB05923 | C11H15N3O6 | 1.56 | 5.76E−05 | 3.37 | Degradation of transfer ribonucleic acid (tRNA) [ | (a) |
RT retention time, MW molecular weight, q value is the adjusted Student’s t test p value using false discovery rate (FDR), the positive value of fold change means a higher level of metabolite in malaria patients compared to healthy controls, whereas the negative value represents a lower level of metabolite. Pathway existence: [1] human and [2] P. falciparum. The identity of biomarkers was confirmed using (a) exact mass and/or RT matched with database, (b) MS/MS spectra matched with reference spectra and/or (c) MS/MS spectra matched with spectra of authentic standards