Mark A Smith1, Ryan T Lacy2, Justin C Strickland2. 1. Department of Psychology, Davidson College, Davidson, NC 28035, USA; Program in Neuroscience, Davidson College, Davidson, NC 28035, USA. Electronic address: masmith@davidson.edu. 2. Department of Psychology, Davidson College, Davidson, NC 28035, USA; Program in Neuroscience, Davidson College, Davidson, NC 28035, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Social learning models of substance use propose that drug-use behaviors are learned by observing and mimicking the behavior of others. The aim of this study was to examine the acquisition of cocaine self-administration in three groups of experimentally naïve rats: rats that were tested in isolation, rats that were tested in the presence of another rat that had access to cocaine and had previously been trained to self-administer cocaine, and rats that were tested in the presence of another rat that did not have access to cocaine. METHODS: Male rats were reared in isolated or pair-housed conditions and implanted with intravenous catheters. Pair-housed rats were then assigned to drug-experienced or drug-naïve conditions. In the drug-experienced condition, one rat of each pair was trained to self-administer cocaine in isolation before the reintroduction of its partner. In the drug-naïve condition, one rat of each pair did not have access to cocaine for the duration of the study. For each group, the acquisition of cocaine self-administration was measured over 15 days in rats with access to cocaine but no prior operant training. RESULTS: Rats tested with a drug-experienced partner were faster to acquire cocaine self-administration and emitted more active lever presses than rats tested with a cocaine-naïve partner. Data for the isolated control group fell between the other two groups on these measures. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that the acquisition of cocaine self-administration can either be facilitated or inhibited by social contact. Collectively, these results support a social learning model of substance use.
BACKGROUND:Social learning models of substance use propose that drug-use behaviors are learned by observing and mimicking the behavior of others. The aim of this study was to examine the acquisition of cocaine self-administration in three groups of experimentally naïve rats: rats that were tested in isolation, rats that were tested in the presence of another rat that had access to cocaine and had previously been trained to self-administer cocaine, and rats that were tested in the presence of another rat that did not have access to cocaine. METHODS: Male rats were reared in isolated or pair-housed conditions and implanted with intravenous catheters. Pair-housed rats were then assigned to drug-experienced or drug-naïve conditions. In the drug-experienced condition, one rat of each pair was trained to self-administer cocaine in isolation before the reintroduction of its partner. In the drug-naïve condition, one rat of each pair did not have access to cocaine for the duration of the study. For each group, the acquisition of cocaine self-administration was measured over 15 days in rats with access to cocaine but no prior operant training. RESULTS:Rats tested with a drug-experienced partner were faster to acquire cocaine self-administration and emitted more active lever presses than rats tested with a cocaine-naïve partner. Data for the isolated control group fell between the other two groups on these measures. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that the acquisition of cocaine self-administration can either be facilitated or inhibited by social contact. Collectively, these results support a social learning model of substance use.
Authors: Natalie A Peartree; Kayla N Hatch; Julianna G Goenaga; Nora R Dado; Hanna Molla; Martin A Dufwenberg; Allegra Campagna; Rachel Mendoza; Timothy H C Cheung; Joshua S Talboom; Janet L Neisewander Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2017-03-31 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Andrea M Robinson; Gaylen E Fronk; Huailin Zhang; Scott Tonidandel; Mark A Smith Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: P Carrieri; C Baunez; E Giorla; S Nordmann; C Vielle; Y Pelloux; P Roux; C Protopopescu; C Manrique; K Davranche; C Montanari; L Giorgi; A Vilotitch; P Huguet Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Mark A Smith; Karl T Schmidt; Jessica L Sharp; Tallia Pearson; Anna L Davis; Abigail N Gibson; Kenzie M Potter Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2021-11-17 Impact factor: 4.432
Authors: Andrea M Robinson; Ryan T Lacy; Justin C Strickland; Charlotte P Magee; Mark A Smith Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Ryan T Lacy; Justin C Strickland; Max A Feinstein; Andrea M Robinson; Mark A Smith Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2016-07-02 Impact factor: 4.530