Geoffrey P Whitfield1, Deborah Riebe, Meir Magal, Gary Liguori. 1. 1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; 2University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI; and 3North Carolina Wesleyan College, Rocky Mount, NC.
Abstract
PURPOSE: For most people, the benefits of physical activity far outweigh the risks. Research has suggested that exercise preparticipation questionnaires might refer an unwarranted number of adults for medical evaluation before exercise initiation, creating a potential barrier to adoption. The new American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) prescreening algorithm relies on current exercise participation; history and symptoms of cardiovascular, metabolic, or renal disease; and desired exercise intensity to determine referral status. Our purpose was to compare the referral proportion of the ACSM algorithm to that of previous screening tools using a representative sample of U.S. adults. METHODS: On the basis of responses to health questionnaires from the 2001-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, we calculated the proportion of adults 40 yr or older who would be referred for medical clearance before exercise participation based on the ACSM algorithm. Results were stratified by age and sex and compared with previous results for the ACSM/American Heart Association Preparticipation Questionnaire and the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire. RESULTS: On the basis of the ACSM algorithm, 2.6% of adults would be referred only before beginning vigorous exercise and 54.2% of respondents would be referred before beginning any exercise. Men were more frequently referred before vigorous exercise, and women were more frequently referred before any exercise. Referral was more common with increasing age. The ACSM algorithm referred a smaller proportion of adults for preparticipation medical clearance than the previously examined questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: Although additional validation is needed to determine whether the algorithm correctly identifies those at risk for cardiovascular complications, the revised ACSM algorithm referred fewer respondents than other screening tools. A lower referral proportion may mitigate an important barrier of medical clearance from exercise participation.
PURPOSE: For most people, the benefits of physical activity far outweigh the risks. Research has suggested that exercise preparticipation questionnaires might refer an unwarranted number of adults for medical evaluation before exercise initiation, creating a potential barrier to adoption. The new American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) prescreening algorithm relies on current exercise participation; history and symptoms of cardiovascular, metabolic, or renal disease; and desired exercise intensity to determine referral status. Our purpose was to compare the referral proportion of the ACSM algorithm to that of previous screening tools using a representative sample of U.S. adults. METHODS: On the basis of responses to health questionnaires from the 2001-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, we calculated the proportion of adults 40 yr or older who would be referred for medical clearance before exercise participation based on the ACSM algorithm. Results were stratified by age and sex and compared with previous results for the ACSM/American Heart Association Preparticipation Questionnaire and the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire. RESULTS: On the basis of the ACSM algorithm, 2.6% of adults would be referred only before beginning vigorous exercise and 54.2% of respondents would be referred before beginning any exercise. Men were more frequently referred before vigorous exercise, and women were more frequently referred before any exercise. Referral was more common with increasing age. The ACSM algorithm referred a smaller proportion of adults for preparticipation medical clearance than the previously examined questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: Although additional validation is needed to determine whether the algorithm correctly identifies those at risk for cardiovascular complications, the revised ACSM algorithm referred fewer respondents than other screening tools. A lower referral proportion may mitigate an important barrier of medical clearance from exercise participation.
Authors: Deborah Riebe; Barry A Franklin; Paul D Thompson; Carol Ewing Garber; Geoffrey P Whitfield; Meir Magal; Linda S Pescatello Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Paul D Thompson; Barry A Franklin; Gary J Balady; Steven N Blair; Domenico Corrado; N A Mark Estes; Janet E Fulton; Neil F Gordon; William L Haskell; Mark S Link; Barry J Maron; Murray A Mittleman; Antonio Pelliccia; Nanette K Wenger; Stefan N Willich; Fernando Costa Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-05-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Nabil Ghorayeb; Ricardo Stein; Daniel Jogaib Daher; Anderson Donelli da Silveira; Luiz Eduardo Fonteles Ritt; Daniel Fernando Pellegrino Dos Santos; Ana Paula Rennó Sierra; Artur Haddad Herdy; Claúdio Gil Soares de Araújo; Cléa Simone Sabino de Souza Colombo; Daniel Arkader Kopiler; Filipe Ferrari Ribeiro de Lacerda; José Kawazoe Lazzoli; Luciana Diniz Nagem Janot de Matos; Marcelo Bichels Leitão; Ricardo Contesini Francisco; Rodrigo Otávio Bougleux Alô; Sérgio Timerman; Tales de Carvalho; Thiago Ghorayeb Garcia Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Kelley R Covington; Timothy Marshall; Grace Campbell; Grant R Williams; Jack B Fu; Tiffany D Kendig; Nancy Howe; Catherine M Alfano; Mackenzi Pergolotti Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Andrew J Maiorana; Andrew D Williams; Christopher D Askew; Itamar Levinger; Jeff Coombes; Bill Vicenzino; Kade Davison; Neil A Smart; Steve E Selig Journal: Sports Med Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Martin G Schultz; Katharine D Currie; Kristofer Hedman; Rachel E Climie; Andrew Maiorana; Jeff S Coombes; James E Sharman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-28 Impact factor: 3.390