Geoffrey P Whitfield1, Kelley K Pettee Gabriel, Mohammad H Rahbar, Harold W Kohl. 1. Division of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas School of Public Health, Austin, TX (G.P.W., K.K.P.G., M.H.R., H.W.K.); Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX (M.H.R.); and the Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX (H.W.K.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although the American Heart Association/American College of Sports Medicine's Preparticipation Questionnaire (AAPQ) is a recommended preexercise cardiovascular screening tool, it has never been systematically evaluated. The purpose of this research is to provide preliminary evidence of its effectiveness among adults aged ≥40 years. METHODS AND RESULTS: Under the assumption that participants would respond to AAPQ items as they responded to a general health survey, we calculated the sex- and age-specific proportions of adult participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001 to 2004 who would receive a recommendation for physician consultation based on AAPQ referral criteria. Additionally, we compared recommended AAPQ referrals to a similar assessment using the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire in the study sample. AAPQ referral proportions were higher with older age. Across all age groups ≥40 years, 95.5% (94.3% to 96.8%) of women and 93.5% (92.2% to 94.7%) of men in the United States would be advised to consult a physician before exercise. Prescription medication use and age were the most commonly selected items. When referral based on AAPQ was compared with that of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire, the 2 screening tools produced similar results for 72.4% of respondents. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that >90% of US adults aged ≥40 years would receive a recommendation for physician consultation by the AAPQ. Excessive referral may present an unnecessary barrier to exercise adoption and stress the healthcare infrastructure.
BACKGROUND: Although the American Heart Association/American College of Sports Medicine's Preparticipation Questionnaire (AAPQ) is a recommended preexercise cardiovascular screening tool, it has never been systematically evaluated. The purpose of this research is to provide preliminary evidence of its effectiveness among adults aged ≥40 years. METHODS AND RESULTS: Under the assumption that participants would respond to AAPQ items as they responded to a general health survey, we calculated the sex- and age-specific proportions of adult participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001 to 2004 who would receive a recommendation for physician consultation based on AAPQ referral criteria. Additionally, we compared recommended AAPQ referrals to a similar assessment using the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire in the study sample. AAPQ referral proportions were higher with older age. Across all age groups ≥40 years, 95.5% (94.3% to 96.8%) of women and 93.5% (92.2% to 94.7%) of men in the United States would be advised to consult a physician before exercise. Prescription medication use and age were the most commonly selected items. When referral based on AAPQ was compared with that of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire, the 2 screening tools produced similar results for 72.4% of respondents. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that >90% of US adults aged ≥40 years would receive a recommendation for physician consultation by the AAPQ. Excessive referral may present an unnecessary barrier to exercise adoption and stress the healthcare infrastructure.
Entities:
Keywords:
epidemiology; exercise; health surveys; mass screening
Authors: B E Ainsworth; W L Haskell; M C Whitt; M L Irwin; A M Swartz; S J Strath; W L O'Brien; D R Bassett; K H Schmitz; P O Emplaincourt; D R Jacobs; A S Leon Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: G J Balady; B Chaitman; D Driscoll; C Foster; E Froelicher; N Gordon; R Pate; J Rippe; T Bazzarre Journal: Circulation Date: 1998-06-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Paula A Braveman; Catherine Cubbin; Susan Egerter; David R Williams; Elsie Pamuk Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-02-10 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Alicen A Whitaker; Stacey E Aaron; Carolyn S Kaufman; Brady K Kurtz; Stephen X Bai; Eric D Vidoni; Robert N Montgomery; Sandra A Billinger Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2021-12-09
Authors: Mitch J Duncan; Richard R Rosenkranz; Corneel Vandelanotte; Cristina M Caperchione; Amanda L Rebar; Anthony J Maeder; Rhys Tague; Trevor N Savage; Anetta van Itallie; W Kerry Mummery; Gregory S Kolt Journal: Trials Date: 2016-12-07 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Andrew J Maiorana; Andrew D Williams; Christopher D Askew; Itamar Levinger; Jeff Coombes; Bill Vicenzino; Kade Davison; Neil A Smart; Steve E Selig Journal: Sports Med Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Haitham Jahrami; Ahmed S BaHammam; Brendon Stubbs; Ali Sabah; Zahra Saif; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Michael V Vitiello Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: S I E Liem; J M T A Meessen; R Wolterbeek; N Ajmone Marsan; M K Ninaber; T P M Vliet Vlieland; J K de Vries-Bouwstra Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2017-11-18 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Andrea Albergoni; Florentina J Hettinga; Wim Stut; Francesco Sartor Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 3.390