OBJECTIVES: Shared toilets in urban slums are often unclean and poorly maintained, discouraging consistent use and thereby limiting impacts on health and quality of life. We developed behaviour change interventions to support shared toilet maintenance and improve user satisfaction. We report the intervention effectiveness on improving shared toilet cleanliness. METHODS: We conducted a cluster-randomised controlled trial among users of 1226 shared toilets in 23 Dhaka slums. We assessed baseline toilet cleanliness in January 2015. The six-month intervention included provision of hardware (bin for solid waste, 4 l flushing bucket, 70 l water reservoir), and behaviour change communication (compound meetings, interpersonal household sessions, signs depicting rules for toilet use). We estimated the adjusted difference in difference (DID) to assess outcomes and accounted for clustering effects using generalised estimating equations. RESULTS: Compared to controls, intervention toilets were more likely to have water available inside toilet cubicles (DID: +4.7%, 95% CI: 0.2, 9.2), access to brush/broom for cleaning (DID: +8.4%, 95% CI: 2, 15) and waste bins (DID: +63%, 95% CI: 59, 66), while less likely to have visible faeces inside the pan (DID: -13%, 95% CI: -19, -5), the smell of faeces (DID: -7.6%, 95% CI: -14, -1.3) and household waste inside the cubicle (DID: -4%, 95% CI: -7, -1). CONCLUSIONS: In one of few efforts to promote shared toilet cleanliness, intervention compounds were significantly more likely to have cleaner toilets after six months. Future research might explore how residents can self-finance toilet maintenance, or employ mass media to reduce per-capita costs of behaviour change.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Shared toilets in urban slums are often unclean and poorly maintained, discouraging consistent use and thereby limiting impacts on health and quality of life. We developed behaviour change interventions to support shared toilet maintenance and improve user satisfaction. We report the intervention effectiveness on improving shared toilet cleanliness. METHODS: We conducted a cluster-randomised controlled trial among users of 1226 shared toilets in 23 Dhaka slums. We assessed baseline toilet cleanliness in January 2015. The six-month intervention included provision of hardware (bin for solid waste, 4 l flushing bucket, 70 l water reservoir), and behaviour change communication (compound meetings, interpersonal household sessions, signs depicting rules for toilet use). We estimated the adjusted difference in difference (DID) to assess outcomes and accounted for clustering effects using generalised estimating equations. RESULTS: Compared to controls, intervention toilets were more likely to have water available inside toilet cubicles (DID: +4.7%, 95% CI: 0.2, 9.2), access to brush/broom for cleaning (DID: +8.4%, 95% CI: 2, 15) and waste bins (DID: +63%, 95% CI: 59, 66), while less likely to have visible faeces inside the pan (DID: -13%, 95% CI: -19, -5), the smell of faeces (DID: -7.6%, 95% CI: -14, -1.3) and household waste inside the cubicle (DID: -4%, 95% CI: -7, -1). CONCLUSIONS: In one of few efforts to promote shared toilet cleanliness, intervention compounds were significantly more likely to have cleaner toilets after six months. Future research might explore how residents can self-finance toilet maintenance, or employ mass media to reduce per-capita costs of behaviour change.
Authors: Fosiul A Nizame; Mahbub U Alam; Abdullah A Masud; Abul K Shoab; Aftab Opel; Md Khairul Islam; Stephen P Luby; Leanne Unicomb Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Mahbub-Ul Alam; Farhana Sultana; Erin C Hunter; Peter J Winch; Leanne Unicomb; Supta Sarker; Mehjabin Tishan Mahfuz; Abdullah Al-Masud; Mahbubur Rahman; Stephen P Luby Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Prince Antwi-Agyei; Isaac Monney; Kwaku Amaning Adjei; Raphael Kweyu; Sheillah Simiyu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-02 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Farzana Yeasmin; Stephen P Luby; Ronald E Saxton; Fosiul A Nizame; Mahbub-Ul Alam; Notan Chandra Dutta; Abdullah-Al Masud; Dalia Yeasmin; Anita Layden; Habibur Rahman; Rachel Abbott; Leanne Unicomb; Peter J Winch Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Mahbub-Ul Alam; Fazle Sharior; Sharika Ferdous; Atik Ahsan; Tanvir Ahmed; Ayesha Afrin; Supta Sarker; Farhana Akand; Rownak Jahan Archie; Kamrul Hasan; Rosie Renouf; Sam Drabble; Guy Norman; Mahbubur Rahman; James B Tidwell Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sarah Bick; Helen Buxton; Rachel P Chase; Ian Ross; Zaida Adriano; Drew Capone; Jackie Knee; Joe Brown; Rassul Nalá; Oliver Cumming; Robert Dreibelbis Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 3.295