Literature DB >> 28556413

Concomitant screening for liver fibrosis and steatosis in French type 2 diabetic patients using Fibroscan.

Dominique Roulot1, Françoise Roudot-Thoraval2, Gisele NKontchou3, Narcisse Kouacou4, Jean-Luc Costes4, Ghassan Elourimi1, Hervé Le Clesiau4, Marianne Ziol5, Michel Beaugrand3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes is a risk factor for steatohepatitis and fibrosis. Non-invasive liver stiffness (LS) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) measurements by Fibroscan allow assessing liver fat and fibrosis. AIM: To determine the prevalence of steatosis and significant fibrosis in a community-based diabetic population.
METHODS: LS and CAP were measured in 705 patients using the standard "M probe." A second "XL probe" was used, without CAP measurement, in case of failure with the "M probe."
RESULTS: LS and CAP measurements were obtained in 437 patients (the M group), LS measurements (LSM) with the XL probe being available in additional 232 patients. After the combined use of both probes, LSM failure and unreliable result were 1.6% and 5.6% respectively. Overall, 12.7% (n=85), 7.3% and 2.1% exhibited significant or advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis (LSM≥8 kPa, ≥9.6 kPa, ≥13 kPa respectively), half of the patients with LSM≥8 kPa displayed normal liver tests. Significant and severe steatosis were measured in 75% and 24% of the M group patients. By multivariate analysis, factors associated with severe fibrosis were age, overweight, high GGT. Forty-seven patients with LSM≥8 kPa underwent liver biopsy; 93% had steatosis and 51% severe fibrosis. A significant correlation was found between LSM values and fibrosis score with an accuracy rate of 83%, 68% and 83% for LSM≥8 kPa, ≥9.6 kPa and ≥13 kPa respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of significant steatosis is very high and significant fibrosis affect 12.7% of the patients. Fibroscan is an effective procedure to screen for fibrosis and steatosis in diabetic patients.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fibroscan; controlled attenuation parameter; liver stiffness; screening; type 2 diabetes

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28556413     DOI: 10.1111/liv.13481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Int        ISSN: 1478-3223            Impact factor:   5.828


  27 in total

1.  Screening for hepatic fibrosis and steatosis in Turkish patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A transient elastography study.

Authors:  Meryem Demir; Oğuzhan Deyneli; Yusuf Yılmaz
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  Association between abdominal obesity and liver steatosis and fibrosis among patients with chronic hepatitis B measured by Fibroscan.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Yanfang Li; Xuying Sun; Youde Liu; Danxia Zheng; Lijuan Fan
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Plasma Levels of Homocysteine is Associated with Liver Fibrosis in Health Check-Up Population.

Authors:  Dan Lv; Zepu Wang; Shuai Ji; Xiaoxi Wang; Huiqing Hou
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-09-03

4.  Reduced and more appropriate referrals of patients with type 2 diabetes using liver stiffness measurement compared to FIB-4.

Authors:  William Shanahan; Isha Bagwe; Mary Jane Brassill; Paud O'Regan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Risk factors associated with nonalcohol fatty liver disease and fibrosis among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Hongli Zhao; Xiangxin Song; Zhang Li; Xinling Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  A Pragmatic Approach Identifies a High Rate of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease With Advanced Fibrosis in Diabetes Clinics and At-Risk Populations in Primary Care.

Authors:  PreyaJanubhai Patel; Fabrina Hossain; Leigh Ula Horsfall; Xuan Banh; Kelly Lee Hayward; Suzanne Williams; Tracey Johnson; Anne Bernard; Nigel Neil Brown; Guy Lampe; Lyndall Buck; Nivene Saad; Anthony William Russell; Patricia Casarolli Valery; Katharine Margaret Irvine; Andrew Donald Clouston; Katherine Anne Stuart; William Rosenberg; Elizabeth Ellen Powell
Journal:  Hepatol Commun       Date:  2018-08-06

Review 7.  Current and future pharmacological therapies for NAFLD/NASH.

Authors:  Yoshio Sumida; Masashi Yoneda
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 8.  The Role of Insulin Resistance and Diabetes in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Authors:  Hideki Fujii; Norifumi Kawada
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Screening for Liver Fibrosis and Steatosis in a Large Cohort of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Using Vibration Controlled Transient Elastography and Controlled Attenuation Parameter in a Single-Center Real-Life Experience.

Authors:  Ioan Sporea; Ruxandra Mare; Alina Popescu; Silviu Nistorescu; Victor Baldea; Roxana Sirli; Adina Braha; Alexandra Sima; Romulus Timar; Raluca Lupusoru
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Comparison of liver biopsies before and after direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C and correlation with clinical outcome.

Authors:  Omar A Saldarriaga; Bradley Dye; Judy Pham; Timothy G Wanninger; Daniel Millian; Michael Kueht; Benjamin Freiberg; Netanya Utay; Heather L Stevenson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.