Literature DB >> 28555312

Long fusions to S1 with or without pelvic fixation can induce relevant acute variations in pelvic incidence: a retrospective cohort study of adult spine deformity surgery.

Riccardo Cecchinato1, Andrea Redaelli2, Carlotta Martini2, Carlotta Morselli3, Jorge Hugo Villafañe4, Claudio Lamartina2, Pedro Berjano2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to verify if any changes occur in pelvic incidence (PI) in adult patients undergoing long fusion to sacrum for spine deformity and to describe the effect of fixation to pelvis on these variations.
METHODS: We conducted a cross sectional study. Sixty-six adults patients, 87% females (mean ± SD age: 65.1 ± 7.6 years), undergoing fusion from the thoracic spine to the sacrum for adult spine deformity were included. Patients were divided in two different groups: Group A: sacral fixation alone and Group B: sacral fixation plus pelvis fixation. Pre and postoperative standardized full-standing X-rays were analyzed with measurement of: PI, pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA).
RESULTS: A significant effect of time interaction (preoperative to early postoperative; F = 59.93, F = 44.78 and F = 39.87, all p < 0.001) existed for PT, SS and TK in both groups (all, p < 0.001). After adjustment for patients' age (>65 vs. <65 years), a statistically significant increase of PI was observed in patients >65 years (p = 0.006) in Group A between preoperative and postoperative measurements. All patients in Group B exhibited a decrease in PI from preoperative to postoperative.
CONCLUSIONS: Older patients undergoing long fusion to the sacrum without pelvic fixation had an increase in PI after surgery. Conversely, pelvic fixation with hips intraoperatively extended has decreased the value of PI from pre- to early postoperative. These changes could be related to degeneration of the sacroiliac joints causing increased rotational mobility and the magnitude of the differences is in the range of clinical relevance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult spine deformity; Pelvic incidence; Sagittal balance; Spine; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28555312     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5154-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  24 in total

Review 1.  Pelvic parameters: origin and significance.

Authors:  J C Le Huec; S Aunoble; Leijssen Philippe; Pellet Nicolas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Pelvic incidence: an anatomic investigation of 880 cadaveric specimens.

Authors:  Douglas S Weinberg; William Z Morris; Jeremy J Gebhart; Raymond W Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Normative values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment, balance, age, and health-related quality of life in a cohort of healthy adult subjects.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Masashi Okamoto; Shun Hatsushikano; Haruka Shimoda; Masatoshi Ono; Kei Watanabe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Preoperative calculation of the necessary correction in sagittal imbalance surgery: validation of three predictive methods.

Authors:  P Berjano; R Cecchinato; M Damilano; C Morselli; V Sansone; C Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Pelvic parameters and global spine balance for spine degenerative disease: the importance of containing for the well being of content.

Authors:  Diego Garbossa; Matteo Pejrona; Marco Damilano; Valerio Sansone; Alessandro Ducati; Pedro Berjano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Influence of age and sagittal balance of the spine on the value of the pelvic incidence.

Authors:  Legaye Jean
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Sacroiliac joint luxation after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: report of two cases and analysis of failure mechanism.

Authors:  Yann Philippe Charles; Bo Yu; Jean-Paul Steib
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Criteria to restore the sagittal balance in deformity and degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Claudio Lamartina; Pedro Berjano; Mary Petruzzi; Aldo Sinigaglia; Giovanni Casero; Riccardo Cecchinato; Marco Damilano; Roberto Bassani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Ashish Patel; Benjamin Ungar; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Computerized preoperative planning for correction of sagittal deformity of the spine.

Authors:  Nicolas Aurouer; Ibrahim Obeid; Olivier Gille; Vincent Pointillart; Jean-Marc Vital
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 1.246

View more
  17 in total

1.  Sequential correction technique to avoid postoperative global coronal decompensation in rigid adult spinal deformity: a technical note and preliminary results.

Authors:  Hongda Bao; Zhen Liu; Yuancheng Zhang; Xu Sun; Jun Jiang; Bangping Qian; Saihu Mao; Yong Qiu; Zezhang Zhu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Changes in pelvic anatomy after long corrective fusion using iliac screws for adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Hiroki Oba; Shigeto Ebata; Jun Takahashi; Shota Ikegami; Kensuke Koyama; Hiroyuki Kato; Hirotaka Haro; Tetsuro Ohba
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Sagittal balance of the spine.

Authors:  J C Le Huec; W Thompson; Y Mohsinaly; C Barrey; A Faundez
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The association between sacroiliac joint-related pain following lumbar spine surgery and spinopelvic parameters: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Juichi Tonosu; Daisuke Kurosawa; Takako Nishi; Keisuke Ito; Daijiro Morimoto; Yoshiro Musha; Hiroshi Ozawa; Eiichi Murakami
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Comparative tomographic study of the S2-alar-iliac screw versus the iliac screw.

Authors:  Mauro Costa Morais Tavares Junior; João Paço Vaz de Souza; Thiego Pedro Freitas Araujo; Raphael Martus Marcon; Alexandre Fogaça Cristante; Tarcísio Eloy Pessoa de Barros Filho; Olavo Biraghi Letaif
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Restoring the ideal Roussouly sagittal profile in adult scoliosis surgery decreases the risk of mechanical complications.

Authors:  Javier Pizones; Lucía Moreno-Manzanaro; Francisco Javier Sánchez Pérez-Grueso; Alba Vila-Casademunt; Caglar Yilgor; Ibrahim Obeid; Ahmet Alanay; Frank Kleinstück; Emre R Acaroglu; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Curve progression in de novo degenerative lumbar scoliosis combined with degenerative segment disease after short-segment fusion.

Authors:  Yongqiang Wang; Ang Gao; Enhamujiang Hudabardiy; Miao Yu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Long fusion to the pelvis with S2-alar-iliac screws can induce changes in pelvic incidence in adult spinal deformity patients: analysis of predictive factors in a retrospective cohort.

Authors:  ChangChun Tseng; Zhen Liu; HongDa Bao; Jie Li; ZhiHui Zhao; ZongShang Hu; Yong Qiu; ZeZhang Zhu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Reduction and fixation of displaced U-shaped sacral fractures using lumbopelvic fixation: technical recommendations.

Authors:  Stefan Piltz; Bianka Rubenbauer; Wolfgang Böcker; Heiko Trentzsch
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Focal disorders of the spine with compensatory deformities: how to define them.

Authors:  Andrea Redaelli; Pedro Berjano; Max Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.