| Literature DB >> 28555039 |
Meng-Chuan Huang1,2, Wen-Tsan Chang3,4, Hsin-Yu Chang5, Hsin-Fang Chung6, Fang-Pei Chen7, Ya-Fang Huang8, Chih-Cheng Hsu9,10, Shang-Jyh Hwang11.
Abstract
Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) correlate with risk of dyslipidemia and cardiovascular diseases. Fatty acid desaturase (FADS) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) modulate circulating PUFA concentrations. This study examined influence of FADS1 and FADS2 genetic variants on desaturase activities and blood lipid concentrations in type 2 diabetes patients, and further assessed their interrelationships. Selected SNPs (FADS1: rs174547, rs174548, rs174550; FADS2: rs174575, rs174576, rs174583, rs498793 and rs2727270) were genotyped in 820 type 2 diabetes patients and compared with those reported in the HapMap. Patient subgroups (n = 176) without taking lipid-lowering medicine were studied to assess influence of tag SNPs including rs174547, rs174575, rs498793 and rs2727270 on delta-5 desaturase (D5D: 20:4 (n-6)/20:3 (n-6)) and delta-6 desaturase (D6D:18:3 (n-6)/18:2 (n-6)) activities, and blood lipids. FADS1 rs174547 TT/TC/CC and FADS2 rs2727270 CC/CT/TT were significantly (p for trend < 0.05) associated with reduced HDL-C, D5D and D6D activities. Upon adjustment for confounders, D5D (p = 0.006) correlated significantly and D6D marginally (p = 0.07) correlated with increased HDL-C levels, whereas rs174547 and rs2727270 polymorphisms were not associated. D6D andD5D activities may play a role in modulating HDL-C levels in type 2 diabetes. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to investigate how FADS genetic variations interact with desaturase activities or PUFAs in the metabolism of lipoproteins in diabetic patients.Entities:
Keywords: FADS1; FADS2; HDL; diabetes; genetic polymorphisms; polyunsaturated fatty acids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28555039 PMCID: PMC5486258 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14060572
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Baseline characteristics of 820 type 2 diabetes patients and those who without using lipid-lowering drugs (n = 176) a.
| Variables | All Type 2 Diabetes Patients ( | Type 2 Diabetes Patients without Using Lipid-Lowering Drugs ( |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Measures | ||
| Age (year) | 59.5 ± 8.5 | 58.3 ± 8.9 |
| Female (%) | 431 (52.6) | 99 (56.3) |
| Diabetes duration (year) | 11.0 ± 5.7 | 10.7 ± 5.3 |
| Education ≤6 years (%) | 446 (54.4) | 90 (51.1) |
| Smoking (%) | 243 (29.6) | 47 (26.7) |
| Drinking (%) | 99 (12.1) | 21 (11.9) |
| Exercise (%) | 529 (64.5) | 108 (61.4) |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 26.1 ± 3.8 | 25.4 ± 3.9 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 136.4 ± 19.6 | 135.5 ± 22.6 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 79.4 ± 11.0 | 79.1 ± 11.3 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 1.8 ± 1.1 | 1.6 ± 1.1 |
| Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.9 ± 0.9 | 4.8 ± 0.9 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 3.1 ± 0.8 | 3.0 ± 0.8 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.3 |
| non-HDL-C (mmol/L) | 3.9 ± 0.8 | 3.8 ± 0.9 |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/L) | 8.3 ±2.7 | 8.7 ± 3.0 |
| Hemoglobin A1c (%) | 8.0 ± 1.5 | 8.2 ± 1.6 |
| Serum creatinine (μmol/L) | 86.6 ± 67.7 | 80.7 ± 63.2 |
| Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L) | 5.8 ± 2.8 | 5.3 ± 2.3 |
| Plasma PUFA (%) c | ||
| Total PUFA | 40.5 ± 3.5 | |
| n-3 PUFA | 6.9 ± 2.2 | |
| C18:3 n3 (alpha-linolenic acid) | 0.9 ± 0.3 | |
| C20:5 n3 (eicosapentaenoic acid) | 0.9 ± 0.7 | |
| n-6 PUFA | 33.6 ± 3.6 | |
| C18:2 n6 (linoleic acid) | 24.1 ± 4.1 | |
| C18:3 n6 | 0.2 ± 0.2 | |
| C20:3 n6 | 1.7 ± 0.5 | |
| C20:4 n6 (arachidonic acid) | 6.6±1.6 |
Abbreviations: LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol. PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; a Data presented was mean ± SD or n (%). b 176 type 2 diabetes patients without using lowering lipid drugs (statin and fibrate) and with complete plasma fatty acid measures were selected. c Only selected n-6 and n-3 PUFA were presented.
Genotype and allele distribution of FADS polymorphisms among 820 type 2 diabetes patients a.
| Gene | SNPs | Alleles | Genotype (MM/Mm/mm) | Allele Frequency (M/m) | Hapmap Genotype Frequency b (Allele Frequency) | HWE ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs174547 | T/C | 280/395/145 | 955/685 | 33.3/41.7/25.0 c | 0.774 | |
| (34.1/48.2/17.7) | (58.2/41.8) | (54.2/45.8) c | ||||
| rs174548 | G/C | 268/404/147 | 940/698 | 31.8/41.2/27.1 | 0.806 | |
| (32.7/49.3/17.9) | (57.4/42.6) | (52.4/47.6) c | ||||
| rs174550 | C/T | 278/397/145 | 953/687 | 45.5/40.9/13.6 d | 0.874 | |
| (33.9/48.4/17.7) | (41.9/58.1) | (65.9/34.1) d | ||||
| rs174575 | C/G | 613/188/19 | 1414/226 | 80.0/17.8/2.2 d | 0.314 | |
| (74.8/22.9/2.3) | (86.2/13.8) | (88.9/11.1) d | ||||
| rs174576 | A/C | 280/397/143 | 957/683 | 31.8/43.5/24.7 | 0.911 | |
| (34.1/48.1/17.4) | (58.3/41.7) | (53.5/46.5) c | ||||
| rs174583 | T/C | 280/396/142 | 956/680 | 32.1/44/0/23.8 c | 0.922 | |
| (34.1/48.3/17.3) | (58.4/42.6) | (54.2/45.8) c | ||||
| rs498793 | G/A | 683/124/13 | 1490/150 | 79.8/20.2/0 | 0.010 | |
| (83.3/15.1/1.6) | (90.9/9.1) | (89.9/10.1) c | ||||
| rs2727270 | C/T | 243/421/156 | 907/733 | 65.1/25.6/9.3 d | 0.270 | |
| (29.6/51.3/19.0) | (55.3/44.7) | (77.9/22.1) d |
Abbreviations: SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; M, major allele; m, minor allele. a Data is presented as n (%). b The Hapmap website (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.) provides human genome information based on a general healthy population. c The HapMap reference was provided by Chinese in Metropolitan Denver (CHD), CO, USA. d SNPs of rs174550, rs174575 and rs2727270 were not available from the Chinese Han population in Denver but from Han Chinese in Beijing (HCB), China. e HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. HWE for genotype frequency was analyzed by Chi-squared test.
Figure 1Linkage disequilibrium (LD) block generated by the 8 FADS1 and FADS2 polymorphisms genotyped, with pairwise r2 values and color scheme.
The differences of fatty acid desaturase activities among FADS1 and FADS2 genotypes in type 2 diabetes patients (n = 176) a.
| Genotypes | D5D Activity | D6D Activity | n-3 Pathway Activity | n-6 Pathway Activity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (20:4 n6/20:3 n6) | (18:3 n6/18:2 n6) | (20:5 n3/18:3 n3) | (20:4 n6/18:2 n6) | |||
| Mean ± SD | ||||||
| TT | 23 | 4.785 ± 1.162 | 0.020 ± 0.010 | 1.001 ±0 .297 | 0.389 ± 0.087 | |
| rs174547 d | TC | 90 | 4.188 ± 1.306 | 0.011 ± 0.006 | 0.947 ± 0.358 | 0.300 ± 0.091 |
| CC | 63 | 4.126 ± 1.845 | 0.006 ± 0.005 | 0.842 ± 0.987 | 0.233 ± 0.075 | |
| 0.05 | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | |||
| 0.022 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
| CC | 132 | 4.285 ±1.503 | 0.011 ± 0.008 | 0.936 ± 0.716 | 0.292 ± 0.983 | |
| rs174575 d | CG+GG | 44 | 4.120 ± 1.552 | 0.009 ± 0.007 | 0.858 ± 0.407 | 0.266 ± 0.095 |
| 0.426 | 0.008 | 0.309 | 0.098 | |||
| - | - | - | - | |||
| GG | 149 | 4.199 ± 1.393 | 0.011 ± 0.008 | 0.935 ± 0.678 | 0.291 ± 0.094 | |
| rs498793 d | GA+AA | 27 | 4.490 ± 2.069 | 0.008 ± 0.006 | 0.815 ± 0.479 | 0.255 ± 0.113 |
| 0.866 | 0.031 | 0.112 | 0.065 | |||
| - | - | - | - | |||
| CC | 41 | 4.528 ± 1.300 | 0.015 ± 0.009 | 1.039 ± 0.392 | 0.355 ± 0.101 | |
| rs2727270 d | CT | 99 | 4.210 ± 1.477 | 0.011 ± 0.007 | 0.923 ± 0.803 | 0 .275 ± 0.090 |
| TT | 36 | 4.013 ± 1.802 | 0.005 ± 0.002 | 0.759 ± 0.321 | 0.232 ± 0.069 | |
| 0.120 | <0.001 | 0.006 | <0.001 | |||
| 0.039 | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | |||
Abbreviations: FADS, fatty acid desaturase; a Data presented is mean ± SD. ANOVA analysis was performed to test the differences among the FADS SNP genotypes (p value). Simple linear regression analysis was performed to test the trend among FADS SNP genotypes (p for trend). b Independent t-test analysis was performed to test the differences for SNPs rs174575 and rs498793 genotypes (p value). c Simple linear regression analysis (p for trend) didn’t perform as the genotype combined into two groups. d rs174547, rs174575, rs498793 and rs2727270 are tag SNPs.
Differences of plasma lipid concentrations among FADS1 and FADS2 genotypes in type 2 diabetes patients (n = 176). a
| Plasma Lipids | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotypes | Triglyceride | Cholesterol | LDL-C | HDL-C | Non-HDL-C | ||
| (mmol/L) | (mmol/L) | (mmol/L) | (mmol/L) | (mmol/L) | |||
| Mean ± SD | |||||||
| TT | 23 | 1.4 ± 0.6 | 5.1 ± 0.9 | 3.3 ± 0.9 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 4.0 ± 0.9 | |
| rs174547 d | TC | 90 | 1.6 ± 1.2 | 4.8 ± 0.8 | 3.0 ± 0.7 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 3.8 ± 0.8 |
| CC | 63 | 1.7 ±1.1 | 4.7 ± 1.0 | 2.9 ± 0.9 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 3.7 ± 0.9 | |
| 0.699 | 0.201 | 0.098 | 0.098 | 0.485 | |||
| 0.426 | 0.082 | 0.059 | 0.031 | 0.248 | |||
| CC | 132 | 1.5 ± 1.0 | 4.8 ± 0.9 | 3.0 ± 0.8 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 3.8 ± 0.9 | |
| rs174575 d | CG+GG | 44 | 1.7 ± 1.3 | 4.9 ± 0.9 | 3.0 ± 0.9 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 3.8 ± 0.9 |
| 0.625 | 0.645 | 0.983 | 0.964 | 0.627 | |||
| - | - | - | - | - | |||
| GG | 149 | 1.6 ± 1.2 | 4.9 ± 0.9 | 3.0 ± 0.8 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 3.8 ± 0.9 | |
| rs498793 d | GA+AA | 27 | 1.4 ± 0.7 | 4.5 ± 0.9 | 2.8 ± 0.8 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 3.5 ± 0.8 |
| 0.482 | 0.034 | 0.261 | 0.298 | 0.096 | |||
| - | - | - | - | - | |||
| CC | 41 | 1.5 ± 1.3 | 5.0 ± 0.9 | 3.1 ± 0.9 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 3.9 ± 0.9 | |
| rs2727270 d | CT | 99 | 1.6 ± 0.9 | 4.8 ± 0.8 | 3.0 ± 0.7 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 3.8 ± 0.8 |
| TT | 36 | 1.6 ± 1.3 | 4.6 ± 1.0 | 3.0 ± 1.0 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 3.7 ± 1.0 | |
| 0.472 | 0.147 | 0.249 | 0.083 | 0.354 | |||
| 0.699 | 0.059 | 0.112 | 0.025 | 0.299 | |||
Abbreviations: LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol. a Data presented is mean ± SD. ANOVA analysis was performed to test the differences among the FADS SNP genotypes (p value). Simple linear regression analysis was performed to test the trend among FADS SNP genotypes (p for trend). b Independent t-test analysis was performed to test the differences for SNPs rs174575 and rs498793 genotypes (p value). c Simple linear regression analysis (p for trend) didn’t perform as the genotype combined into two groups. d rs174547, rs174575,, rs498793 and rs2727270 are tag SNPs.
Associations among FADS1 rs174547, FADS2 rs2727270, desaturases activities and HDL-C levels type 2 diabetes using multiple linear regression analysis (n = 176). a
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (SE) | Beta (SE) | Beta (SE) | Beta (SE) | Beta (SE) | ||||||
| rs174547 | −0.059 (0.031) | 0.056 | - | - | - | 0.006 (0.050) | 0.898 | |||
| rs2727270 | - | −0.057 (0.031) | 0.064 | - | - | −0.018 (0.045) | 0.687 | |||
| D5D activity | - | - | 0.034 (0.014) | 0.019 | - | 0.041 (0.015) | 0.006 | |||
| D6D activity | - | - | - | 5.303 (2.759) | 0.056 | 6.239 (3.414) | 0.070 | |||
Abbreviations: D5D, delta-5-desaturase; D6D, delta-6-desaturase; a All models are adjusted for confounding factors including age, gender, body mass index, education (≤6 y, >6 y), diabetes duration (years), hemoglobinA1c, alcohol use (yes, no) and exercise (yes, no).