Yejia Song1, Luiz Belardinelli2. 1. University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. 2. Former employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, California.
Abstract
In cardiac myocytes, an enhancement of late sodium current (INaL) under pathological conditions is known to cause prolongation of action potential duration (APD). This study investigated the contribution of INaL under basal, physiological conditions to the APD Whole-cell INaL and the APD of ventricular myocytes isolated from healthy adult guinea pigs were measured at 36°C. The INaL inhibitor GS967 or TTX was applied to block INaL The amplitude of basal INaL and the APD at 50% repolarization in myocytes stimulated at a frequency of 0.17 Hz were -0.24 ± 0.02 pA/pF and 229 ± 6 msec, respectively. GS967 (0.01-1 μmol/L) concentration dependently reduced the basal INaL by 18 ± 3-82 ± 4%. At the same concentrations, GS967 shortened the APD by 9 ± 2 to 25 ± 1%. Similarly, TTX at 0.1-10 μmol/L decreased the basal INaL by 13 ± 1-94 ± 1% and APD by 8 ± 1-31 ± 2%. There was a close correlation (R2 = 0.958) between the percentage inhibition of INaL and the percentage shortening of APD caused by either GS967 or TTX MTSEA (methanethiosulfonate ethylammonium, 2 mmol/L), a NaV1.5 channel blocker, reduced the INaL by 90 ± 5%, suggesting that the NaV1.5 channel isoform is the major contributor to the basal INaL KN-93 (10 μmol/L) and AIP (2 μmol/L), blockers of CaMKII, moderately reduced the basal INaL Thus, this study provides strong evidence that basal endogenous INaL is a significant contributor to the APD of cardiac myocytes. In addition, the basal INaL of guinea pig ventricular myocytes is mainly generated from NaV1.5 channel isoform and is regulated by CaMKII.
In cardiac myocytes, an enhancement of late sodium current (INaL) under pathological conditions is known to cause prolongation of action potential duration (APD). This study investigated the contribution of INaL under basal, physiological conditions to the APD Whole-cell INaL and the APD of ventricular myocytes isolated from healthy adult guinea pigs were measured at 36°C. The INaL inhibitor GS967 or TTX was applied to block INaL The amplitude of basal INaL and the APD at 50% repolarization in myocytes stimulated at a frequency of 0.17 Hz were -0.24 ± 0.02 pA/pF and 229 ± 6 msec, respectively. GS967 (0.01-1 μmol/L) concentration dependently reduced the basal INaL by 18 ± 3-82 ± 4%. At the same concentrations, GS967 shortened the APD by 9 ± 2 to 25 ± 1%. Similarly, TTX at 0.1-10 μmol/L decreased the basal INaL by 13 ± 1-94 ± 1% and APD by 8 ± 1-31 ± 2%. There was a close correlation (R2 = 0.958) between the percentage inhibition of INaL and the percentage shortening of APD caused by either GS967 or TTXMTSEA (methanethiosulfonate ethylammonium, 2 mmol/L), a NaV1.5 channel blocker, reduced the INaL by 90 ± 5%, suggesting that the NaV1.5 channel isoform is the major contributor to the basal INaL KN-93 (10 μmol/L) and AIP (2 μmol/L), blockers of CaMKII, moderately reduced the basal INaL Thus, this study provides strong evidence that basal endogenous INaL is a significant contributor to the APD of cardiac myocytes. In addition, the basal INaL of guinea pig ventricular myocytes is mainly generated from NaV1.5 channel isoform and is regulated by CaMKII.
The late Na+ current (I
NaL) is a component of the fast inward I
Na, which remains activated during the plateau and the repolarization of a cardiac action potential (Noble and Noble 2006; Antzelevitch et al. 2014). I
NaL is increased in congenital and acquired pathological conditions, such as long QT syndrome type 3, cardiac hypertrophy, heart failure, and myocardial ischemia (Belardinelli et al. 2015; Makielski 2016). An enhancement of I
NaL under these pathological conditions may cause a prolongation of the action potential duration (APD) and is considered potentially arrhythmogenic (Belardinelli et al. 2015; Makielski 2016). Inhibition of I
NaL by I
NaL blockers, such as ranolazine, has shown promising antiarrhythmic value (Belardinelli et al. 2015; Makielski 2016). However, because the amplitude of I
NaL under physiological conditions is relatively small, its role (i.e., the I
NaL in the absence of drug or pathological modification) in cardiac repolarization has not been fully recognized.Several lines of evidence suggest that the inward I
NaL may play a significant role in maintaining cardiac depolarization under physiological conditions. (1) I
NaL can remain activated throughout the action potential plateau, where the membrane resistance is high (Weidmann 1951). Therefore, even a small net inward current may cause a significant lengthening of the plateau and thus the APD. (2) The APD is shortened in the presence of TTX, an inhibitor of I
NaL (Coraboeuf et al. 1979; Kiyosue and Arita 1989). (3) In canine ventricular myocytes, the density of I
NaL is greater in the mid‐myocardium, compared with that in the epi‐ and endomyocardium (Zygmunt et al. 2001). In keeping with that, TTX‐induced APD shortening is greater in the mid‐myocardium than in the epi‐ and endomyocardium (Zygmunt et al. 2001). (4) In failing hearts of both human and canine models, inactivation of I
NaL of ventricular myocytes is further slowed, compared with that in myocytes of normal hearts (Maltsev et al. 2007). The enhanced I
NaL contributes to the prolongation of APD (Maltsev et al. 2007), and conversely, inhibition of I
NaL by ranolazine shortens the APD of ventricular myocytes isolated from a canineheart failure model (Undrovinas et al. 2006).The goal of this study was to determine the contribution of basal I
NaL to the APD of ventricular myocytes of healthy guinea pigs. In the past, a precise evaluation of the contribution of basal I
NaL to the APD has been hindered by the small amplitude of the current and the lack of a selective inhibitor. Most studies of I
NaL have been conducted in the presence of I
NaL enhancers, such as anemone toxin II (ATX‐II) (Isenberg and Ravens 1984; Song et al. 2004). In this study, the selective I
NaL inhibitor GS967 (Belardinelli et al. 2013) and low concentrations of TTX were applied to selectively block I
NaL. The amplitude of I
NaL in this study was not preenhanced by drugs or special experimental conditions, except for one series of experiments in which the I
NaL enhancer ATX‐II was applied to verify the specificity of the action of GS967. Thus, the subject of this study was cardiac I
NaL under basal conditions. The role of basal I
NaL in maintaining the depolarization of the ventricular action potential was assessed by comparing the percentage inhibition of I
NaL with the percentage shortening of APD. In addition, we examined whether the basal I
NaL is generated from NaV1.5 channels, and whether the basal I
NaL is regulated by Ca2+/calmodulin‐dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), respectively, by applying the selective NaV1.5 channel blocker MTSEA (methanethiosulfonate ethylammonium) (Haufe et al. 2005; O'Reilly and Shockett 2012) and the CaMKII inhibitors KN‐93 and AIP (autocamtide‐2‐related inhibitory peptide).
Materials and Methods
Animal use was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, and conformed to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Research Council, 2011). Hearts of guinea pigs of either sex were isolated and perfused via the aorta with warm (35°C) and oxygenated solutions in the following order: (1) Tyrode solution containing (in mmol/L) 135 NaCl, 4.6 KCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 glucose, and 10 HEPES, pH 7.4, for 5 min; (2) Ca2+‐free solution containing (in mmol/L) 100 NaCl, 30 KCl, 2 MgCl2, 10 glucose, 10 HEPES, 15 taurine, and 5 pyruvate, pH 7.4, for 5 min; and (3) Ca2+‐free solution containing collagenase (120 units/mL) and albumin (2 mg/mL), for 20 min. At the end of the perfusion, the ventricles were minced and gently shaken for 10 min in the collagenase solution to release single cells. Only the quiescent myocytes with clear striations were used for this study.Transmembrane voltages and currents were recorded using the whole‐cell patch‐clamp technique. Data were acquired and analyzed with an Axopatch‐200 amplifier, a Digidata‐1440A digitizer, and pCLAMP‐10 software. All experiments were performed at 36°C.For measurements of action potentials, cells were incubated in the Tyrode solution (bath solution). The recording pipettes were filled with a solution containing (in mmol/L) 120 K‐aspartate, 20 KCl, 1 MgSO4, 4 Na2ATP, 0.1 Na3GTP, and 10 HEPES, pH 7.3. A depolarizing pulse was applied every 6 sec to elicit action potentials. The APD was determined from the beginning of depolarization to the time when 30% (APD30), 50% (APD50), and 90% (APD90) of repolarization were completed.For measurements of I
NaL, myocytes were superfused with a bath solution containing (in mmol/L) 135 NaCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 glucose, 10 HEPES, 4.6 CsCl, 0.05 NiCl2, and 0.01 nitrendipine, pH 7.4. The recording pipettes were filled with a solution containing (in mmol/L) 120 Cs‐aspartate, 20 CsCl, 1 MgSO4, 4 Na2ATP, 0.1 Na3GTP, and 10 HEPES, pH 7.2. Sodium current was activated by 200–250 msec long voltage‐clamp pulses applied every 10 sec, from a holding potential of −90 mV to a test potential of −30 or −50 mV. The amplitude of I
NaL was calculated as the average amplitude of current during the last 100 msec of a depolarizing pulse.GS967 was synthesized by Gilead Sciences. MTSEA was purchased from Toronto Research Chemicals, KN‐93 and KN‐92 from Calbiochem, AIP from Tocris, and ATX‐II from Sigma. KN‐93, KN‐92, and AIP were applied through the recording pipette solution; other drugs were added to the bath solutions. The duration of each drug treatment was 3 min before recording.Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Sample size (n) is shown as number of cells/from number of hearts. Statistical analyses were conducted using SigmaPlot software. Concentration–response relationship and EC50 for GS967 inhibition of I
NaL were calculated from a standard four‐parameter logistic curve fitted with the following equation:Coefficient of determination (R
2) was calculated from a standard linear regression curve fitted with the following model:The t‐test or one‐way ANOVA followed by Holm–Sidak method was applied for statistical analysis. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Contribution of basal I
NaL to APD
To verify the action of GS967 as an I
NaL blocker, the effect GS967 on I
NaL induced by the I
NaL enhancer ATX‐II was examined. In this series of experiments, I
NaL was activated by voltage‐clamp pulses from −90 to −50 mV. ATX‐II (5 nmol/L) increased the amplitude of I
NaL at −50 mV from −0.12 ± 0.01 to −0.47 ± 0.03 pA/pF (n = 24/9, P < 0.001). GS967 reversibly and concentration dependently inhibited the I
NaL in the presence of ATX‐II. GS967 at concentrations of 0.1, and 0.3 μmol/L significantly (P < 0.001, n = 12/5) reduced the amplitude of ATX‐II‐stimulated I
NaL by 41 ± 2% and 93 ± 5%, respectively (Fig. 1). In another group of myocytes (n = 12/4), the ATX‐II‐stimulated I
NaL was inhibited by 0.03 and 1 μmol/L GS967 by 24 ± 3% and 100%, respectively (P < 0.001, not shown).
Figure 1
Concentration‐dependent inhibition by GS967 of ATX‐II (5 nmol/L)‐induced
aL. Inward currents were activated by depolarizing pulses from −90 to −50 mV. Panel A, superimposed currents recorded in the order of a–e from a single myocyte before (control) and after drug treatments. Panel B, summary of the average amplitude of
aL recorded before (A) and after (B–E) drug treatments, as shown in panel A (n = 12/5). *P < 0.001 versus control; †
P < 0.001 versus ATX‐II alone.
Concentration‐dependent inhibition by GS967 of ATX‐II (5 nmol/L)‐induced
aL. Inward currents were activated by depolarizing pulses from −90 to −50 mV. Panel A, superimposed currents recorded in the order of a–e from a single myocyte before (control) and after drug treatments. Panel B, summary of the average amplitude of
aL recorded before (A) and after (B–E) drug treatments, as shown in panel A (n = 12/5). *P < 0.001 versus control; †
P < 0.001 versus ATX‐II alone.To estimate the amplitude of basal I
NaL, voltage‐clamp pulses from −90 to −30 mV were applied to activate inward I
Na. The average amplitude of I
NaL at −30 mV was −0.24 ± 0.02 pA/pF (n = 40/17). GS967 at concentrations of 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, and 10 μmol/L, respectively, concentration dependently reduced the amplitude of basal I
NaL by 18 ± 3, 28 ± 3, 38 ± 2, 46 ± 2, 82 ± 4, 91 ± 4, and 100% (P < 0.05, n = 10/3–5 for each concentration; Each myocyte was treated with 2–3 concentrations of GS967), with an IC50 of 0.46 μmol/L (Fig. 2, A and B). TTX at concentrations of 0.1, 1, and 10 μmol/L, respectively, significantly (P < 0.001) decreased the amplitude of I
NaL by 16 ± 2% (n = 13/4), 52 ± 4% (n = 13/4), and 94 ± 1% (n = 18/6; Fig. 2C and D), further confirming that the I
NaL was indeed an inward sodium current.
Figure 2
Concentration‐dependent inhibition by GS967 or TTX of basal
aL.
aL was elicited by voltage‐clamp pulses from −90 to −30 mV. Panel A, example of current traces recorded from a single myocyte in the absence of drugs (control) and in the presence of 0.3 and 1 μmol/L GS967 (GS). Panel B, concentration–response relationship of the inhibitory effect of GS967 on
aL. Each data point represents an average inhibition observed from 10 myocytes isolated from 3 to 5 hearts. Data points are fitted with a four‐parameter logistic curve. Panel C, current traces recorded before (A) and after (B) application of TTX, and after washing out TTX (C). Panel D, bars show an average inhibition of
aL by 0.1 (n = 13/4), 1 (n = 13/4), and 10 (n = 18/6) μmol/L TTX, respectively.
Concentration‐dependent inhibition by GS967 or TTX of basal
aL.
aL was elicited by voltage‐clamp pulses from −90 to −30 mV. Panel A, example of current traces recorded from a single myocyte in the absence of drugs (control) and in the presence of 0.3 and 1 μmol/L GS967 (GS). Panel B, concentration–response relationship of the inhibitory effect of GS967 on
aL. Each data point represents an average inhibition observed from 10 myocytes isolated from 3 to 5 hearts. Data points are fitted with a four‐parameter logistic curve. Panel C, current traces recorded before (A) and after (B) application of TTX, and after washing out TTX (C). Panel D, bars show an average inhibition of
aL by 0.1 (n = 13/4), 1 (n = 13/4), and 10 (n = 18/6) μmol/L TTX, respectively.The baseline APD30, APD50, and APD90 measured from the myocytes were 198 ± 5 msec, 229 ± 6 msec, and 248 ± 6 msec, respectively (n = 43/14). GS967 at concentrations of 0.01 (n = 10/4), 0.1 (n = 25/10), and 1 (n = 19/7) μmol/L, respectively, significantly (P < 0.003) shortened the APD30 by 11 ± 2, 17 ± 1, and 27 ± 2%, APD50 by 9 ± 2, 16 ± 1, and 25 ± 1%, and APD90 by 8 ± 2, 14 ± 1, and 22 ± 1% (Fig. 3, A and B). TTX at concentrations of 0.1(n = 9/2), 1 (n = 15/4), and 10 (n = 15/3) μmol/L significantly (P < 0.05) decreased the APD30 by 8 ± 1, 24 ± 2, and 33 ± 2%, APD50 by 8 ± 1, 23 ± 2, and 31 ± 2%, and APD90 by 7 ± 1, 21 ± 2, and 29 ± 2%, respectively (Fig. 3, C and D).
Figure 3
Concentration‐dependent shortening by GS967 or TTX of the action potential duration (APD). Panel A, example of action potential traces recorded from a single myocyte before (control) and after applications of 0.01, 0.1, and 1 μmol/L GS967 (GS). Panel B, summary of APD shortening caused by GS967 at concentrations of 0.01 (n = 10/4), 0.1 (n = 25/10), and 1 (n = 19/7) μmol/L, respectively. Panel C, action potentials recorded from a myocyte in the absence of drug (control) and in the presence of 0.1, 1, and 10 μmol/L TTX. Panel D, average shortening of APD caused by TTX at concentrations of 0.1 (n = 9/2), 1 (n = 15/4), and 10 (n = 15/3) μmol/L.
Concentration‐dependent shortening by GS967 or TTX of the action potential duration (APD). Panel A, example of action potential traces recorded from a single myocyte before (control) and after applications of 0.01, 0.1, and 1 μmol/L GS967 (GS). Panel B, summary of APD shortening caused by GS967 at concentrations of 0.01 (n = 10/4), 0.1 (n = 25/10), and 1 (n = 19/7) μmol/L, respectively. Panel C, action potentials recorded from a myocyte in the absence of drug (control) and in the presence of 0.1, 1, and 10 μmol/L TTX. Panel D, average shortening of APD caused by TTX at concentrations of 0.1 (n = 9/2), 1 (n = 15/4), and 10 (n = 15/3) μmol/L.There was a close correlation (R
2 = 0.958) between the percentage inhibition of basal I
NaL and the percentage shortening of APD caused by either GS967 or TTX (Fig. 4), indicating that basal I
NaL significantly contributes to the APD.
Figure 4
Correlation of APD shortening and
aL inhibition in the presence of GS967 (●) and TTX (○). The percentage shortenings of APD are plotted against the percentage inhibition of
aL caused by GS967 and TTX at the same concentrations. Coefficient of determination (R
2) is calculated using SigmaPlot linear regression curve analysis.
Correlation of APD shortening and
aL inhibition in the presence of GS967 (●) and TTX (○). The percentage shortenings of APD are plotted against the percentage inhibition of
aL caused by GS967 and TTX at the same concentrations. Coefficient of determination (R
2) is calculated using SigmaPlot linear regression curve analysis.
Inhibition of basal I
NaL by NaV1.5 channel blocker
MTSEA is a selective blocker of NaV1.5 channels (Haufe et al. 2005; O'Reilly and Shockett 2012). In this study, MTSEA (2 mmol/L) was added to the bath solution to determine whether the basal I
NaL of myocytes was generated from the NaV1.5 channels. I
NaL was activated by depolarizing pulses from −90 to −30 mV. In this series of experiments, MTSEA decreased the amplitude of I
NaL by 90 ± 5%, from −0.20 ± 0.03 to 0.03 ± 0.01 pA/pF (n = 12/6, P < 0.001; Fig. 5). The result suggests that under the experimental conditions, the NaV1.5 channel is the major contributor to the I
NaL of guinea pig ventricular myocytes.
Figure 5
Inhibition of
aL by the selective NaV1.5 channel blocker MTSEA (2 mmol/L). Panel A, currents recorded from a myocyte before (control) and after application of MTSEA. Panel B, summary of the results obtained from experiments shown in panel A. Bars represent the average amplitude of
aL determined from 12 myocytes isolated from six hearts. *P < 0.001 versus control.
Inhibition of
aL by the selective NaV1.5 channel blocker MTSEA (2 mmol/L). Panel A, currents recorded from a myocyte before (control) and after application of MTSEA. Panel B, summary of the results obtained from experiments shown in panel A. Bars represent the average amplitude of
aL determined from 12 myocytes isolated from six hearts. *P < 0.001 versus control.
Decrease in basal I
NaL by CaMKII inhibitors
Activation of CaMKII was reported to slow sodium channel inactivation. We used the CaMKII inhibitors KN‐93 and AIP, and an inactive analog of KN‐93 and KN‐92, as a negative control, to determine whether CaMKII plays a significant role in maintaining basal I
NaL. The three drugs were applied through the recording pipette solution to three separate groups of myocytes, respectively.I
NaL was activated by voltage‐clamp pulses from −90 to −30 mV. The amplitude of I
NaL measured in the absence of drugs was −0.24 ± 0.02 pA/pF. KN‐93 (10 μmol/L) and AIP (2 μmol/L) reduced the I
NaL to −0.17 ± 0.02 pA/pF (n = 11/3, P < 0.05) and −0.17 ± 0.02 pA/pF (n = 11/5, P < 0.05), respectively (Fig. 6), whereas KN‐92 (10 μmol/L) had no effect on I
NaL (−0.24 ± 0.02 pA/pF, n = 12/4; Fig. 6).
Figure 6
Decrease in
aL in the presence of CaMKII inhibitors. Panel A, representative current traces recorded from four myocytes treated with no drug (control), KN‐93 (10 μmol/L), KN‐92 (10 μmol/L), and AIP (2 μmol/L), respectively. Panel B, summary of the results obtained from experiments shown in panel A. Bars represent the average amplitude of
aL in control (n = 40/17) and in the presence of KN‐93 (n = 11/3), KN‐92 (n = 12/4), and AIP (n = 11/5). *P < 0.05 versus control.
Decrease in
aL in the presence of CaMKII inhibitors. Panel A, representative current traces recorded from four myocytes treated with no drug (control), KN‐93 (10 μmol/L), KN‐92 (10 μmol/L), and AIP (2 μmol/L), respectively. Panel B, summary of the results obtained from experiments shown in panel A. Bars represent the average amplitude of
aL in control (n = 40/17) and in the presence of KN‐93 (n = 11/3), KN‐92 (n = 12/4), and AIP (n = 11/5). *P < 0.05 versus control.
Discussion
This study revealed that the basal I
NaL is of sufficient magnitude to affect the duration of the action potential of ventricular myocytes isolated from healthy guinea pigs. In the presence of the I
NaL blocker GS967 or low concentrations of TTX, the reduction in I
NaL was closely correlated with the shortening of APD (Figs. 2, 3, 4). Furthermore, the study showed that the basal I
NaL of guinea pig ventricular myocytes was mainly generated from the NaV1.5 channels (Fig. 5) and was regulated by CaMKII (Fig. 6). Thus, the results of the present study suggest that the basal, CaMKII‐mediated NaV1.5 INaL is a significant and physiological contributor to the action potential duration of guinea pig ventricular myocytes.The action potentials of cardiac ventricular myocytes are characterized by a prominent plateau phase (phase 2) (Draper and Weidmann 1951). Repolarization is delayed during the plateau phase, and thus the duration of a myocardial action potential is largely determined by the length of the plateau phase. The action potential plateau is caused by a balance between depolarizing currents, including the inward L‐type (I
CaL) and T‐type (I
CaT) Ca2+ current, Na+–Ca2+ exchange current (I
NCX) and I
NaL, and repolarizing currents, such as the outward delayed rectifier K+ current (I
K) (Ten Eick et al. 1992). The amplitude of I
NaL under physiological conditions is relatively small. In this study, the average amplitude of I
NaL was −0.24 ± 0.02 pA/pF. However, because I
NaL remains activated throughout the plateau phase and the membrane resistance is known to be high at the plateau (Weidmann 1951), even a small inward current such as I
NaL could play a significant role in maintaining cardiac depolarization, and thereby the duration of action potential. Myocytes used in this study were isolated from the whole ventricles; therefore, the present results represented the average effect of basal I
NaL on the duration of ventricular action potentials. As it has been reported that the density of I
NaL is greater in the mid‐myocardium than that in the epi‐ and endomyocardium (Zygmunt et al. 2001), it will be interesting to know if there is a regional difference in the contribution of I
NaL to the APD among different parts of ventricular myocardium.Assessment of the contribution of basal I
NaL to APD requires the use of an inhibitor that, at least at certain concentrations, selectively and concentration dependently reduces I
NaL, and has no effect on other ion currents that can modulate the APD. We used the I
NaL inhibitor GS967 at concentrations and conditions in which its inhibition was selective for the I
NaL (Belardinelli et al. 2013). For comparison, the Na+ channel blocker TTX applied at low concentrations was used to confirm that the inward current recorded was a Na+‐channel current. The selectivity of GS967 to inhibit I
NaL has been studied using rabbit ventricular myocytes (Belardinelli et al. 2013). The results of that study showed that, at a holding potential of −120 mV and a stimulation frequency of 0.1–3 Hz, GS967 (0.1–5 μmol/L) concentration dependently blocked ATX‐II‐stimulated I
NaL without reducing the peak I
Na. In addition, GS967 (1–3 μmol/L) had no significant effect on I
CaL, I
CaT, and ATP‐sensitive K+ current, although GS967 at a high concentration of 10 μmol/L caused a small (17%) inhibition of the rapid component of I
K. In this study of guinea pig ventricular myocytes, GS967 concentration dependently inhibited ATX‐II‐induced I
NaL (Fig. 1), further confirming that this compound is a suitable pharmacological tool to investigate the role of I
NaL in cardiac repolarization. GS967 at 1 μmol/L blocked the ATX‐II stimulated and the basal I
NaL by 100% and 82 ± 4%, respectively. Thus, it appears that the potency of GS967 to inhibit I
NaL is greater in the presence, than in the absence, of ATX‐II. This could be due to a sensitization by ATX‐II of sodium channels to the inhibitory action of GS967, as it has been found that sodium channel site‐3 toxins (such as ATX‐II) can enhance the binding and action of site‐1 toxin (such as TTX) and local anesthetics on this channel (Nishio et al. 1991).A contribution of basal I
NaL to the APD was suggested by a previous study (Kiyosue and Arita 1989). In that study, TTX at a concentration of 60 μmol/L caused a decrease in APD of ventricular myocytes isolated from healthy guinea pigs. However, TTX at such a high concentration could block not only the peak I
Na, but also the L‐ and T‐type Ca2+ channels (Sun et al. 2008; Hegyi et al. 2012), which would also lead to a shortening of the APD. To verify the role of I
NaL in modulation of APD, we used the selective I
NaL blocker GS967 and low concentrations of TTX to determine the effect of an inhibition of basal I
NaL on the APD. Our results showed that GS967 and TTX at a concentration as low as 0.01 μmol/L and 0.1 μmol/L, respectively, could cause a significant shortening of the APD (Fig. 3). Furthermore, a quantitative analysis indicated that the inhibition of basal I
NaL and the shortening of APD caused by GS967 and TTX were closely correlated (Fig. 4).NaV1.5 channel has been recognized as the dominant sodium channel of ventricular myocytes (Gellens et al. 1992; Maltsev et al. 2008; Veerman et al. 2015). In addition to the NaV1.5 channel, other sodium channel isoforms may also contribute to the cardiac sodium current. One study reported that A‐803467, a NaV1.8 channel blocker, blocked I
NaL of mouse and rabbit ventricular myocytes, suggesting that NaV1.8 channel contributes to cardiac I
NaL ((Yang et al. 2012). In contrast, another study found that A‐803467 had no effect on sodium current of mouse ventricular myocytes (Verkerk et al. 2012). In this study, the selective NaV1.5 channel blocker MTSEA (Haufe et al. 2005; O'Reilly and Shockett 2012) decreased the amplitude of basal I
NaL by 90 ± 5%, indicating that under the conditions of our experiments, the NaV1.5 channel isoform is a major contributor to basal I
NaL of guinea pig ventricular myocytes.Cardiac myocytes overexpressing CaMKII showed an enhanced I
NaL (Wagner et al. 2006). In this study, we investigated the role of CaMKII in regulating basal I
NaL by comparing the amplitude of I
NaL in the absence and presence of the CaMKII inhibitor KN‐93 or AIP. Because KN‐93 and its inactive analog KN‐92 may have CaMKII‐independent effects on ion channels if applied extracellularly (Rezazadeh et al. 2006), these drugs and AIP were applied intracellularly through the pipette solution. Our results showed that the amplitude of basal I
NaL was decreased by either KN‐93 or AIP, but not by KN‐92, suggesting a significant role of CaMKII in regulating cardiac I
NaL under basal conditions (Fig. 6). However, CaMKII phosphorylation may not be the only mechanism to maintain basal I
NaL. Other mechanisms, such as protein kinase C (Ma et al. 2012), may also be involved in the regulation of basal I
NaL.In summary, in this study we investigated the role of basal I
NaL in modulating the cardiac APD, by quantitatively determining the relationship between the amplitude of I
NaL and the duration of action potential. The results showed a close correlation between a decrease in I
NaL and a shortening of the APD, and thus provide strong evidence that basal endogenous I
NaL is a significant contributor to the APD of cardiac myocytes. The present results also demonstrated that the basal I
NaL of guinea pig ventricular myocytes is mainly generated from NaV1.5 channel isoform and is regulated by CaMKII.
Conflict of Interest
Y. Song received a research grant from Gilead Sciences; L. Belardinelli was an employee of Gilead Sciences at the time of this study.
Authors: Arie O Verkerk; Carol Ann Remme; Cees A Schumacher; Brendon P Scicluna; Rianne Wolswinkel; Berend de Jonge; Connie R Bezzina; Marieke W Veldkamp Journal: Circ Res Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Victor A Maltsev; John W Kyle; Sudhish Mishra; Abertas Undrovinas Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2008-06-13 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Bence Hegyi; Tamás Bányász; Leighton T Izu; Luiz Belardinelli; Donald M Bers; Ye Chen-Izu Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2018-09-18 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Balázs Horváth; Norbert Szentandrássy; János Almássy; Csaba Dienes; Zsigmond Máté Kovács; Péter P Nánási; Tamas Banyasz Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Date: 2022-02-15