Literature DB >> 28554716

Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation Pumps in Advanced Heart Failure.

Shiva K Annamalai1, Lyanne Buiten2, Michele L Esposito1, Vikram Paruchuri2, Andrew Mullin2, Catalina Breton2, Robert Pedicini2, Ryan O'Kelly1, Kevin Morine1, Benjamin Wessler2, Ayan R Patel2, Michael S Kiernan1, Richard H Karas1, Navin K Kapur3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The utility of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation pumps (IABPs) in low cardiac output states is unknown and no studies have explored the impact of IABP therapy on ventricular workload in patients with advanced heart failure (HF). For these reasons, we explored the acute hemodynamic effects of IABP therapy in patients with advanced HF.
METHODS: We prospectively studied 10 consecutive patients with stage D HF referred for IABP placement before left ventricular assist device (LVAD) surgery and compared with 5 control patients with preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) who did not receive IABP therapy. Hemodynamics were recorded using LV conductance and pulmonary artery catheters. Cardiac index (CI)-responder and CI-nonresponder status was assigned a priori as being "equal to or above" or below the median of the IABP effect on CI, respectively, within 24 hours after IABP activation.
RESULTS: Compared with controls, patients with advanced HF had lower LVEF, lower LV end-systolic pressure, lower LV stroke work, and higher LV end-diastolic pressures and volumes before IABP activation. IABP activation reduced LV stroke work primarily by reducing end-systolic pressure. IABP therapy increased CI by a median of 20% as well as increased diastolic pressure time index and the myocardial oxygen supply:demand ratio. Compared with CI-nonresponders, CI-responders had higher systemic vascular resistance, lower right heart filling pressures, and a trend toward lower left heart filling pressures with improved indices of right heart function. Compared with CI-nonresponders, the diastolic pressure time index was increased among CI-responders.
CONCLUSIONS: IABP therapy may be effective at reducing LV stroke work, increasing CI, and favorably altering the myocardial oxygen supply:demand ratio in patients with advanced HF, especially among patients with low right heart filling pressures and high systemic vascular resistance.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hemodynamics; heart failure; interventional cardiology; mechanical circulatory support

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28554716     DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Fail        ISSN: 1071-9164            Impact factor:   5.712


  10 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical Left Ventricular Unloading to Reduce Infarct Size During Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insight from Preclinical and Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Navin K Kapur; Lara Reyelt; Lija Swain; Michele Esposito; Xiaoying Qiao; Shiva Annamalai; Bart Meyns; Richard Smalling
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Revascularization in Cardiogenic Shock and Advanced Heart Failure.

Authors:  Youssef Rahban; Carlos D Davila; Peter S Natov; Navin K Kapur
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-02-07

3.  Abdominal Positioning of the Next-Generation Intra-Aortic Fluid Entrainment Pump (Aortix) Improves Cardiac Output in a Swine Model of Heart Failure.

Authors:  Shiva K Annamalai; Michele L Esposito; Lara A Reyelt; Peter Natov; Lena E Jorde; Richard H Karas; Navin K Kapur
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 8.790

4.  Acute right heart failure: future perspective with the PERKAT RV pulsatile right ventricular support device.

Authors:  Markus W Ferrari; P Christian Schulze; Daniel Kretzschmar
Journal:  Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

5.  Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Defining Coronary Responders.

Authors:  Natalia Briceno; Kalpa De Silva; Matthew Ryan; Tiffany Patterson; Kevin O'Gallagher; Howard Ellis; Simone Rivolo; Jack Lee; Simon Redwood; Ajay M Shah; Michael Marber; Divaka Perera
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation timing: A new numerical model for programming and training in the clinical environment.

Authors:  Claudio De Lazzari; Beatrice De Lazzari; Attilio Iacovoni; Silvia Marconi; Silvia Papa; Massimo Capoccia; Roberto Badagliacca; Carmine Dario Vizza
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Framework for patient-specific simulation of hemodynamics in heart failure with counterpulsation support.

Authors:  Mattia Arduini; Jonathan Pham; Alison L Marsden; Ian Y Chen; Daniel B Ennis; Seraina A Dual
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-01

8.  Predicting survival in patients with acute decompensated heart failure complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Nuccia Morici; Giovanna Viola; Laura Antolini; Gianfranco Alicandro; Michela Dal Martello; Alice Sacco; Maurizio Bottiroli; Federico Pappalardo; Luca Villanova; Laura De Ponti; Carlo La Vecchia; Maria Frigerio; Fabrizio Oliva; Justin Fried; Paolo Colombo; Arthur Reshad Garan
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-06-04

9.  Windkessel model of hemodynamic state supported by a pulsatile ventricular assist device in premature ventricle contraction.

Authors:  Keun Her; Joon Yeong Kim; Ki Moo Lim; Seong Wook Choi
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 10.  Mechanical Support in Early Cardiogenic Shock: What Is the Role of Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation?

Authors:  Jesse R Kimman; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Henrik Endeman; Jasper J Brugts; Alina A Constantinescu; Olivier C Manintveld; Eric A Dubois; Corstiaan A den Uil
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2020-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.