Kayoll V Galbraith-Gyan1, Julia Lechuga2, Coretta M Jenerette3, Mary H Palmer4, Angelo D Moore5, Jill B Hamilton6. 1. a Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences , Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University , Boston , USA. 2. b College of Education , Lehigh University , Bethlehem , USA. 3. c Department of Adult and Geriatric Health, School of Nursing , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , USA. 4. d Health Care Environment Division , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , USA. 5. e Moore & Moore Healthcare Consulting , LLC , Cumberland , USA. 6. f Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing , Emory University , Atlanta , USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Much of the research on African-Americans' HPV vaccine acceptance has largely focused on racial/ethnic differences related to cognitive, socio-economical, and structural factors that contribute to differences in HPV vaccine acceptance and completion. A growing body of literature suggest that cultural factors, such as mistrust of healthcare providers (HCPs) and the healthcare system, religion, and social norms related to appropriate sexual behaviors, also plays a prominent role in their HPV vaccine acceptance. However, these studies were limited in their use of theoretical approaches necessary to conceptualize and operationalize culture. OBJECTIVE: To explore the influence of culture on African-American mothers' and daughters' HPV vaccine acceptance using the PEN-3, a culturally-centered conceptual framework. METHODS: Grounded theory techniques were used to explore cultural factors that influenced the acceptance of the HPV vaccine among African-American mothers (n = 28) and their daughters (n = 34). RESULTS: Positive attitudes towards vaccination stemmed from beliefs that the HPV vaccine has cancer prevention benefits and that vaccinations in general protected against infectious diseases. Negative attitudes stemmed from beliefs that the HPV vaccine was too new, not effective, daughters were too young, and that vaccines were not a one-size-fits-all intervention. Majority of mothers and daughters indicated that their religious doctrine did not impede their HPV vaccination decisions. For a few mothers, religious beliefs could not be separated from their HPV vaccination decisions and ultimately deterred HPV vaccine acceptance. HCP recommendations were valued however mothers were often dissatisfied with the detail of information communicated. Support networks provided both positive and negative types of social support to mothers and daughters. The media highlighted the cancer prevention benefits of the HPV vaccine and unintentionally communicated negative information of the HPV vaccine, which deterred HPV vaccine acceptance. CONCLUSION: Study findings can inform the development of culturally appropriate interventions that advances the evidence on cervical cancer prevention.
BACKGROUND: Much of the research on African-Americans' HPV vaccine acceptance has largely focused on racial/ethnic differences related to cognitive, socio-economical, and structural factors that contribute to differences in HPV vaccine acceptance and completion. A growing body of literature suggest that cultural factors, such as mistrust of healthcare providers (HCPs) and the healthcare system, religion, and social norms related to appropriate sexual behaviors, also plays a prominent role in their HPV vaccine acceptance. However, these studies were limited in their use of theoretical approaches necessary to conceptualize and operationalize culture. OBJECTIVE: To explore the influence of culture on African-American mothers' and daughters' HPV vaccine acceptance using the PEN-3, a culturally-centered conceptual framework. METHODS: Grounded theory techniques were used to explore cultural factors that influenced the acceptance of the HPV vaccine among African-American mothers (n = 28) and their daughters (n = 34). RESULTS: Positive attitudes towards vaccination stemmed from beliefs that the HPV vaccine has cancer prevention benefits and that vaccinations in general protected against infectious diseases. Negative attitudes stemmed from beliefs that the HPV vaccine was too new, not effective, daughters were too young, and that vaccines were not a one-size-fits-all intervention. Majority of mothers and daughters indicated that their religious doctrine did not impede their HPV vaccination decisions. For a few mothers, religious beliefs could not be separated from their HPV vaccination decisions and ultimately deterred HPV vaccine acceptance. HCP recommendations were valued however mothers were often dissatisfied with the detail of information communicated. Support networks provided both positive and negative types of social support to mothers and daughters. The media highlighted the cancer prevention benefits of the HPV vaccine and unintentionally communicated negative information of the HPV vaccine, which deterred HPV vaccine acceptance. CONCLUSION: Study findings can inform the development of culturally appropriate interventions that advances the evidence on cervical cancer prevention.
Entities:
Keywords:
African American; Culture; HPV vaccine acceptance; females; human papillomavirus
Authors: Kayoll V Galbraith; Julia Lechuga; Coretta M Jenerette; Ltc Angelo D Moore; Mary H Palmer; Jill B Hamilton Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2016-04-30 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Bridgette M Brawner; Jillian L Baker; Chelsea D Voytek; Amy Leader; Rebecca R Cashman; Randee Silverman; Nadja Peter; Bradley J Buchner; Christopher A Barnes; Loretta S Jemmott; Ian Frank Journal: Health Promot Pract Date: 2012-10-24
Authors: Sarah Reagan-Steiner; David Yankey; Jenny Jeyarajah; Laurie D Elam-Evans; C Robinette Curtis; Jessica MacNeil; Lauri E Markowitz; James A Singleton Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Marjan Javanbakht; Shauna Stahlman; Susan Walker; Sami Gottlieb; Lauri Markowitz; Nicole Liddon; Aaron Plant; Sarah Guerry Journal: Vaccine Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Lauri E Markowitz; Susan Hariri; Carol Lin; Eileen F Dunne; Martin Steinau; Geraldine McQuillan; Elizabeth R Unger Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Melissa B Gilkey; Mo Zhou; Annie-Laurie McRee; Melanie L Kornides; John F P Bridges Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Lane McLendon; Jesse Puckett; Chelsea Green; Jenna James; Katharine J Head; Hee Yun Lee; Jennifer Young Pierce; Mark Beasley; Casey L Daniel Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 3.452