Courtney Gidengil1, Christine Chen2, Andrew M Parker3, Sarah Nowak4, Luke Matthews5. 1. RAND Corporation, 20 Park Plaza, Suite 920, Boston, MA 02116, USA; Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: gidengil@rand.org. 2. Frederick S. Pardee RAND Graduate School, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401, USA; RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401, USA. Electronic address: cchen@rand.org. 3. RAND Corporation, 4570 Fifth Ave #600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. Electronic address: parker@rand.org. 4. RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401, USA. Electronic address: snowak@rand.org. 5. RAND Corporation, 20 Park Plaza, Suite 920, Boston, MA 02116, USA. Electronic address: lmatthew@rand.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While childhood vaccines are safe and effective, some parents remain hesitant to vaccinate their children, which has led to outbreaks of vaccine preventable diseases. The goal of this systematic review was to identify and summarize the range of beliefs around childhood vaccines elicited using open-ended questions, which are better suited for discovering beliefs compared to closed-ended questions. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched using keywords for childhood vaccines, decision makers, beliefs, and attitudes to identify studies that collected primary data using a variety of open-ended questions regarding routine childhood vaccine beliefs in the United States. Study designs, population characteristics, vaccine types, and vaccine beliefs were abstracted. We conducted a qualitative analysis to conceptualize beliefs into themes and generated descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of 1727 studies identified, 71 were included, focusing largely on parents (including in general, and those who were vaccine hesitant or at risk of hesitancy). Seven themes emerged: Adverse effects was most prominent, followed by mistrust, perceived lack of necessity, pro-vaccine opinions, skepticism about effectiveness, desire for autonomy, and morality concerns. The most commonly described beliefs included that vaccines can cause illnesses; a child's immune system can be overwhelmed if receiving too many vaccines at once; vaccines contain harmful ingredients; younger children are more susceptible to vaccine adverse events; the purpose of vaccines is profit-making; and naturally developed immunity is better than that acquired from vaccines. Nearly a third of the studies exclusively assessed minority populations, and more than half of the studies examined beliefs only regarding HPV vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Few studies used open-ended questions to elicit beliefs about vaccines. Many of the studies that did so, focused on HPV vaccine. Concerns about vaccine safety were the most commonly stated beliefs about childhood vaccines, likely because studies were designed to capture barriers and challenges to vaccination.
BACKGROUND: While childhood vaccines are safe and effective, some parents remain hesitant to vaccinate their children, which has led to outbreaks of vaccine preventable diseases. The goal of this systematic review was to identify and summarize the range of beliefs around childhood vaccines elicited using open-ended questions, which are better suited for discovering beliefs compared to closed-ended questions. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched using keywords for childhood vaccines, decision makers, beliefs, and attitudes to identify studies that collected primary data using a variety of open-ended questions regarding routine childhood vaccine beliefs in the United States. Study designs, population characteristics, vaccine types, and vaccine beliefs were abstracted. We conducted a qualitative analysis to conceptualize beliefs into themes and generated descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of 1727 studies identified, 71 were included, focusing largely on parents (including in general, and those who were vaccine hesitant or at risk of hesitancy). Seven themes emerged: Adverse effects was most prominent, followed by mistrust, perceived lack of necessity, pro-vaccine opinions, skepticism about effectiveness, desire for autonomy, and morality concerns. The most commonly described beliefs included that vaccines can cause illnesses; a child's immune system can be overwhelmed if receiving too many vaccines at once; vaccines contain harmful ingredients; younger children are more susceptible to vaccine adverse events; the purpose of vaccines is profit-making; and naturally developed immunity is better than that acquired from vaccines. Nearly a third of the studies exclusively assessed minority populations, and more than half of the studies examined beliefs only regarding HPV vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Few studies used open-ended questions to elicit beliefs about vaccines. Many of the studies that did so, focused on HPV vaccine. Concerns about vaccine safety were the most commonly stated beliefs about childhood vaccines, likely because studies were designed to capture barriers and challenges to vaccination.
Authors: Bridgette M Brawner; Jillian L Baker; Chelsea D Voytek; Amy Leader; Rebecca R Cashman; Randee Silverman; Nadja Peter; Bradley J Buchner; Christopher A Barnes; Loretta S Jemmott; Ian Frank Journal: Health Promot Pract Date: 2012-10-24
Authors: Natalie Pierre Joseph; Jack A Clark; Howard Bauchner; Jared P Walsh; Glory Mercilus; Jean Figaro; Caroline Bibbo; Rebecca B Perkins Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2012 Nov-Dec
Authors: Barbara Bardenheier; Hussain Yusuf; Benjamin Schwartz; Deborah Gust; Lawrence Barker; Lance Rodewald Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2004-06
Authors: Jennifer D Allen; Maria de Jesus; Dana Mars; Laura Tom; Lindsay Cloutier; Rachel C Shelton Journal: J Oncol Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 4.375
Authors: Manika Suryadevara; Cynthia A Bonville; Donald A Cibula; Joseph B Domachowske Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Nicholas B Schmuhl; Katherine E Mooney; Xiao Zhang; Laura G Cooney; James H Conway; Noelle K LoConte Journal: Vaccine Date: 2020-04-03 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Luke J Matthews; Andrew M Parker; Monique Martineau; Courtney A Gidengil; Christine Chen; Jeanne S Ringel Journal: Rand Health Q Date: 2022-06-30
Authors: Lavanya Vasudevan; Jan Ostermann; Yunfei Wang; Sayward E Harrison; Valerie Yelverton; Laura J Fish; Charnetta Williams; Emmanuel B Walter Journal: Vaccine X Date: 2022-06-15
Authors: William A Calo; Melissa B Gilkey; Parth D Shah; Anne-Marie Dyer; Marjorie A Margolis; Susan Alton Dailey; Noel T Brewer Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2021-02-02
Authors: Matthew F Daley; Liza M Reifler; Jo Ann Shoup; Komal J Narwaney; Elyse O Kharbanda; Holly C Groom; Michael L Jackson; Steven J Jacobsen; Huong Q McLean; Nicola P Klein; Joshua T B Williams; Eric S Weintraub; Michael M McNeil; Jason M Glanz Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2021-04-30 Impact factor: 5.043