Literature DB >> 28553674

Analytic quantification of bias and variance of coil sensitivity profile estimators for improved image reconstruction in MRI.

Aymeric Stamm1, Jolene Singh1, Onur Afacan1, Simon K Warfield1.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging provides a unique in-vivo capability of visualizing tissue in the human brain non-invasively, which has tremendously improved patient care over the past decades. However, there are still prominent artifacts, such as intensity inhomogeneities due to the use of an array of receiving coils (RC) to measure the MR signal or noise amplification due to accelerated imaging strategies. It is critical to mitigate these artifacts for both visual inspection and quantitative analysis. The cornerstone to address this issue pertains to the knowledge of coil sensitivity profiles (CSP) of the RCs, which describe how the measured complex signal decays with the distance to the RC. Existing methods for CSP estimation share a number of limitations: (i) they primarily focus on CSP magnitude, while it is known that the solution to the MR image reconstruction problem involves complex CSPs and (ii) they only provide point estimates of the CSPs, which makes the task of optimizing the parameters and acquisition protocol for their estimation difficult. In this paper, we propose a novel statistical framework for estimating complex-valued CSPs. We define a CSP estimator that uses spatial smoothing and additional body coil data for phase normalization. The main contribution is to provide detailed information on the statistical distribution of the CSP estimator, which yields automatic determination of the optimal degree of smoothing for ensuring minimal bias and provides guidelines to the optimal acquisition strategy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bias; coil sensitivity profile; image reconstruction; variance

Year:  2015        PMID: 28553674      PMCID: PMC5446094          DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24571-3_82

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv


  7 in total

Review 1.  SMASH, SENSE, PILS, GRAPPA: how to choose the optimal method.

Authors:  Martin Blaimer; Felix Breuer; Matthias Mueller; Robin M Heidemann; Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-08

2.  The NMR phased array.

Authors:  P B Roemer; W A Edelstein; C E Hayes; S P Souza; O M Mueller
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  A review of methods for correction of intensity inhomogeneity in MRI.

Authors:  Uros Vovk; Franjo Pernus; Bostjan Likar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Phase and sensitivity of receiver coils in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  E R McVeigh; M J Bronskill; R M Henkelman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Correction for intensity falloff in surface coil magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  W W Brey; P A Narayana
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Noise and filtration in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  E R McVeigh; R M Henkelman; M J Bronskill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1985 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  Massively parallel MRI detector arrays.

Authors:  Boris Keil; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.229

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Gradient-Guided Isotropic MRI Reconstruction from Anisotropic Acquisitions.

Authors:  Yao Sui; Onur Afacan; Camilo Jaimes; Ali Gholipour; Simon K Warfield
Journal:  IEEE Trans Comput Imaging       Date:  2021-11-17

2.  Bulk motion-compensated DCE-MRI for functional imaging of kidneys in newborns.

Authors:  Jaume Coll-Font; Onur Afacan; Jeanne S Chow; Richard S Lee; Alto Stemmer; Simon K Warfield; Sila Kurugol
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 4.813

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.