Literature DB >> 28551193

Drivers of choice for fluid milk versus plant-based alternatives: What are consumer perceptions of fluid milk?

K S McCarthy1, M Parker1, A Ameerally1, S L Drake1, M A Drake2.   

Abstract

Fluid milk consumption has declined for decades while consumption of nondairy alternatives has increased. A better understanding of why consumers purchase fluid milk or nondairy alternatives is needed to assist increased sales of milk or maintain sales without further decline. The objective of this study was to determine the extrinsic attributes that drive purchase within each product category. The second objective was to determine the personal values behind the purchase of each beverage type to give further understanding why particular attributes are important. An online conjoint survey was launched with 702 dairy consumers, 172 nondairy consumers, and 125 consumers of both beverages. Individual means-end chain interviews were conducted with fluid milk consumers (n = 75), plant-based alternative consumers (n = 68), and consumers of both beverages (n = 78). Fat content was the most important attribute for dairy milk followed by package size and label claims. Consumers of fluid milk preferred 1 or 2% fat content, gallon, or half-gallon packaging, conventionally pasteurized store-brand milk. Sugar level was the most important attribute for plant-based beverages, followed by plant source and package size. Almond milk was the most desirable plant source, and half-gallon packaging was the most preferred packaging. Means-end chain interviews results suggested that maintaining a balanced diet and healthy lifestyle was important to all consumer groups. Lactose free was an important attribute for plant-based alternative consumers and consumers of both dairy and nondairy. A distinguishing characteristic of those who only drank nondairy plant-based alternatives was that plant-based beverages contributed to a goal to consume less animal products, beliefs about animal mistreatment, and perceived lesser effect on the environment than fluid milk. Unique to fluid milk consumers was that fluid milk was perceived as a staple food item. These results suggest that the dairy industry should focus on the nutrition value of milk and educating consumers about misconceptions regarding dairy milk. Future beverage innovation should include the development of lactose-free milk that is also appealing to consumers in flavor.
Copyright © 2017 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conjoint analysis; consumer liking; fluid milk; means-end chain analysis; nondairy alternative

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28551193     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-12519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  25 in total

1.  Effects of Milk and Dairy Products on the Prevention of Osteoporosis and Osteoporotic Fractures in Europeans and Non-Hispanic Whites from North America: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pilar Matía-Martín; Macarena Torrego-Ellacuría; Angélica Larrad-Sainz; Cristina Fernández-Pérez; Federico Cuesta-Triana; Miguel Ángel Rubio-Herrera
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Perspectives from healthcare professionals on the nutritional adequacy of plant-based dairy alternatives: results of a mixed methods inquiry.

Authors:  Bridget E Clark; Lizzy Pope; Emily H Belarmino
Journal:  BMC Nutr       Date:  2022-05-12

3.  Consumers' Ability to Distinguish Between Milk Types: Results of Blind Taste Testing.

Authors:  Karen Glanz; Casey Fenoglio; Ryan Quinn; Allison Karpyn; Donna Paulhamus Giordano
Journal:  Fam Community Health       Date:  2021 Jul-Sep 01

4.  Association of Lactase Persistence Genotypes (rs4988235) and Ethnicity with Dairy Intake in a Healthy U.S. Population.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Chin; Liping Huang; Yasmine Y Bouzid; Catherine P Kirschke; Blythe Durbin-Johnson; Lacey M Baldiviez; Ellen L Bonnel; Nancy L Keim; Ian Korf; Charles B Stephensen; Danielle G Lemay
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Got Mylk? The Emerging Role of Australian Plant-Based Milk Alternatives as A Cow's Milk Substitute.

Authors:  Yianna Y Zhang; Jaimee Hughes; Sara Grafenauer
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  High confidence, yet poor knowledge of infant feeding recommendations among adults in Nova Scotia, Canada.

Authors:  Kathleen Chan; Kyly C Whitfield
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  Foods for Plant-Based Diets: Challenges and Innovations.

Authors:  Alexandra Alcorta; Adrià Porta; Amparo Tárrega; María Dolores Alvarez; M Pilar Vaquero
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-02-01

8.  Differences in Hedonic Responses, Facial Expressions and Self-Reported Emotions of Consumers Using Commercial Yogurts: A Cross-Cultural Study.

Authors:  Mitali Gupta; Damir D Torrico; Graham Hepworth; Sally L Gras; Lydia Ong; Jeremy J Cottrell; Frank R Dunshea
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-05-29

9.  Plant-Based Beverages in the Diets of Infants and Young Children.

Authors:  Lisa M Bodnar; Elizabeth Y Jimenez; Susan S Baker
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 26.796

10.  Nutritional Quality of Plant-Based Drinks Sold in Italy: The Food Labelling of Italian Products (FLIP) Study.

Authors:  Donato Angelino; Alice Rosi; Giorgia Vici; Marika Dello Russo; Nicoletta Pellegrini; Daniela Martini
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.